Twinkie defense wrote:People sleeping on Podz again...
Again? In his second year? lol
I think a lot of us don’t like a Steph/podz backcourt definitely.
Moderators: Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose
Twinkie defense wrote:People sleeping on Podz again...
whatisacenter wrote:Again? In his second year? lol
I think a lot of us don’t like a Steph/podz backcourt definitely.
all left wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:all left wrote:
I like these rotations, except maybe for that which begins at 3 minutes left in the first quarter. That's the only lineup that lacks Steph but also doesn't have three proven top level defensive players. Perhaps the assumption is that that lineup mostly will face similar mixes of starters and rotation players at that time in most games. Or maybe you have more confidence in Moody than I have, but he hasn't quite shown me enough yet (not his fault, perhaps, but nonetheless).
If they are hoping for a playoff spot in a tough West, I would find a way to get Melton a few more minutes than you have allotted in the first part of the season, if he is healthy. He is a proven defender and his 3 point shooting hovers close to 40%. Then see which among the young guys really is taking a step up, particularly on the defensive end, and then perhaps remix.
There's probably a way around it, but I like having a chunk of time where younger/less appreciated players can step up. That would be Podz, Moody and JK's time to step up while having a spacer in Hield and a good floor guy like SloMo there. Moody is one of the more underappreciated guys in the league - per minute, he's brought more +/- impact than JK, yet he's always fighting for minutes. Good to great off-ball defender, excellent rebounder for a wing (above average for a forward). His usage is one of the more baffling things about Kerr, and that says a lot because there are plenty of choices
I like Melton too, but he's a 3&D guy with some handles. Ironically if the team makes it in the playoffs, he'll be way more important, but regular season.. he's more of a luxury. System is designed to tolerate bad on-ball defenders (see #1 defense with Jordan Poole at POA) and his off-ball defense is slightly above average per metrics. I think somewhere in the 24-28mpg is about right for him, unless he develops an offensive game inside the arc somehow. Not much of a playmaker or finisher.. funny enough, he profiles a lot like Moody - an above average role player that can shoot well enough to stay on the court for 20+ minutes and hustles like hell
That all makes sense to me-- particularly because Moody and JK are at the point where they need to step up. One thing that makes that a least somewhat more likely is if the coach is showing confidence in your ability to step up, enough so that you can rely on your place in the rotation and just go out and play, even if there are some bumps in the road. I'm less down on Kerr than many on this board seem to be, but his weaknesses have to do with being somewhat conservative/risk averse, and that's the kind of thing he seems to find hardest to do.
CDM_Stats wrote:all left wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:
There's probably a way around it, but I like having a chunk of time where younger/less appreciated players can step up. That would be Podz, Moody and JK's time to step up while having a spacer in Hield and a good floor guy like SloMo there. Moody is one of the more underappreciated guys in the league - per minute, he's brought more +/- impact than JK, yet he's always fighting for minutes. Good to great off-ball defender, excellent rebounder for a wing (above average for a forward). His usage is one of the more baffling things about Kerr, and that says a lot because there are plenty of choices
I like Melton too, but he's a 3&D guy with some handles. Ironically if the team makes it in the playoffs, he'll be way more important, but regular season.. he's more of a luxury. System is designed to tolerate bad on-ball defenders (see #1 defense with Jordan Poole at POA) and his off-ball defense is slightly above average per metrics. I think somewhere in the 24-28mpg is about right for him, unless he develops an offensive game inside the arc somehow. Not much of a playmaker or finisher.. funny enough, he profiles a lot like Moody - an above average role player that can shoot well enough to stay on the court for 20+ minutes and hustles like hell
That all makes sense to me-- particularly because Moody and JK are at the point where they need to step up. One thing that makes that a least somewhat more likely is if the coach is showing confidence in your ability to step up, enough so that you can rely on your place in the rotation and just go out and play, even if there are some bumps in the road. I'm less down on Kerr than many on this board seem to be, but his weaknesses have to do with being somewhat conservative/risk averse, and that's the kind of thing he seems to find hardest to do.
IMO Kerr got comfortable letting the stars fix their mistakes and carry the team, but we just havent had an actual new star since KD joined and left. He then lets psuedo stars play w/o correction (ie Kuminga/Poole's defense and off-ball play) or plays veterans out of their ideal situations (Klay/Wiggins). Worst thing is, he acknowledges it with his words after the game, but doesnt ever seem to pull the trigger in game. We'll see.. but I dont think Kerr's good for this kind of team. Requires a coach who adapt as the game goes on, and he's been very unwilling to historically due to past success
whatisacenter wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:People sleeping on Podz again...
Again? In his second year? lol
I think a lot of us don’t like a Steph/podz backcourt definitely.
SpreeS wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:People sleeping on Podz again...
Again? In his second year? lol
I think a lot of us don’t like a Steph/podz backcourt definitely.
i like a lot this backcourt
Curry/Podz no Klay 694min +14.96 nrtg
Curry/Podz/Klay 285min -15.56 nrtg
cladden wrote:Steph
Wiggins
Kuminga
Dray
TJD
Bigball!
Yeah, too much defense and too little offense isn’t a big concern for me.CDM_Stats wrote:
It’s the right words, but will he follow through? Kerr always seems to be more terrified of being offensively challenged than defensively.. until that changes, it’s going to be problematic. I think Buddy Hield's usage will tell us a lot about how much Kerr is really willing to bend on that
CDM_Stats wrote:
Its the right words, but will he follow through? Kerr always seems to be more terrified of being offensively challenged than defensively.. until that changes, its going to be problematic. I think Buddy Hield's usage will tell us a lot about how much Kerr is really willing to bend on that
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Return to Golden State Warriors