ReasonablySober wrote:Kerb Hohl wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:
You're crazy if you think this isn't driving current coaches at Alabama and Oklahoma insane. Just look at what Venables had to say this week. Saban up and quit over NIL. Bama lost a likely top five pick and their replacement was a Hunter Wohler level guy.
Nobody in power wants this current reality. The system works for no one.
We had this argument last year and for the life of me I don't get it.
The Yankees occasionally lose a free agent. But the system
absolutely **** rules for them because they get the good/better guys 90% of the time.
You're saying the Yankees should ask for a hard salary cap because in theory Juan Soto left and they hoped he'd stay?
What don't you understand about parity and leveling the playing field? Alabama thrived pre-NIL. Occasionally you'd have a challenger like Clemson pop up or an Auburn when Cam Newton arrived.
NIL allowed deep pocket boosters at other programs to get in the game. You think it's a coincidence that all of the sudden Miami is back? They bought the best QB on the transfer market and two new lines. Or that Michigan has finally won after years of being a joke? They've got some of the deepest pockets in college football. Tennessee is now a massive spending juggernaut. That doesn't happen in 2019.
NIL has woken sleeping giants.
I mean it seems like nothing has changed to me. There's 5-10 absolute rocket powerhouse teams and they're brand names and have always been paying players, now they can do it easier. The people that like making money are happy about it.
Georgia dominated just before NIL and still look dominant.
Yeah, maybe it woke up some sleeping giants but those sleeping giants make money and therefore the system will remain the same because the teams with money are winning, kind of like before, just with slightly different teams at times.
Whether the other teams in the mix are Miami because they're paying a bunch of money or Wisconsin because they develop players well probably doesn't matter much.