Capn'O wrote:god shammgod wrote:stuporman wrote:Three playoff appearances in four years and the last two years winning a playoff series with a contention window still open another 4-5 years after two decades of ineptitude aside from one old man ring chaser season that had no sustainability but 'this FO ruined the Knicks'?
maybe that's overkill but this last move is a bit questionable
this isn't some slam dunk no brainer at all. even if the og contract is too high, it is, or we gave up a bit too much for mikal, we did, we knew that they were quality players and they would fit in with what we do seamlessly. this is a total change to who the knicks are and at a price that may make it impossible to get out of. i just don't know about this.
It's a risk. It could work. But definitely a risk. I do like this final version better than any of the versions that included Mitch. I imagine the Wolves did too, having Gobert.
One thing I'm wondering is where we stand as an OREB team. Our top 10 offense was almost entirely predicated on crashing the offensive boards. We still have some of those pieces but how does that work with Towns, or does it?
i'm guessing they think they'll have a better offense now and not need to rely on that as much. we'll see. kat averaged 1.5 a game last year. the wolves were 6th worse at offensive rebounds and that's with gobert starting next to him. so that's not gonna be a big thing for them if he's starting at the 5.