3toheadmelo wrote:E-Balla doing gods work here. I’m glad he’s back
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
He’s Homeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Embrace him 3tothehead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EMBRACE HIMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
3toheadmelo wrote:E-Balla doing gods work here. I’m glad he’s back
god shammgod wrote:Capn'O wrote:god shammgod wrote:
maybe that's overkill but this last move is a bit questionable
this isn't some slam dunk no brainer at all. even if the og contract is too high, it is, or we gave up a bit too much for mikal, we did, we knew that they were quality players and they would fit in with what we do seamlessly. this is a total change to who the knicks are and at a price that may make it impossible to get out of. i just don't know about this.
It's a risk. It could work. But definitely a risk. I do like this final version better than any of the versions that included Mitch. I imagine the Wolves did too, having Gobert.
One thing I'm wondering is where we stand as an OREB team. Our top 10 offense was almost entirely predicated on crashing the offensive boards. We still have some of those pieces but how does that work with Towns, or does it?
i'm guessing they think they'll have a better offense now and not need to rely on that as much. we'll see. kat averaged 1.5 a season last year. the wolves were 6th worse at offensive rebounds and that's with gobert starting next to him. so that's not gonna be a big thing for them if he's starting at the 5.
3toheadmelo wrote:E-Balla doing gods work here. I’m glad he’s back
E-Balla wrote:KnixinSix wrote:E-Balla wrote:KAT doesn't make you a true 5 out team because he can't defend. Might as well play small ball with Randle. And you'll still have 5 out spacing with no interior defense and good rebounding.
Many metrics and the eyeball test of how he played vs Jokic and KD in the playoffs would seem to strongly refute that.
KAT looked good vs Jokic because he was smoking wide open jumpers that KAT as part of their defensive scheme gave to Jokic. He scored 59 points on 55 shots guarded by KAT despite shooting 4-21 from deep. Leaving Jokic to take wide open 3s and praying he misses isn't great defense.
And he guarded KD only in game one. KD had 31 on 11/17 shooting and they took KAT off as the primary defender.
On top of all of that he's not a PF for us he's a C. KAT at C was the worst defensive player in the league for almost a decade. It's easier to hide him with Gobert and Reid behind him but now he's the backbone of our defense.
There's a reason Minny felt safe moving him, and it's because quite frankly if he wasn't on the roster they go to the Finals.
Ray Williams wrote:E-Balla wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
There's very few 5 out teams, you gotta pay the cost to have one at this point.
KAT doesn't make you a true 5 out team because he can't defend. Might as well play small ball with Randle. And you'll still have 5 out spacing with no interior defense and good rebounding.
Thibs illegitimate son disagrees!
thebuzzardman wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:The general rule is that if you feel uneasy or just plain bad about a trade then it likely isn’t a good trade.
This trade has had mixed reactions across the board here, in the general public, in basketball media, etc.
We locked into an absolutely horrible contract for a minimum of the next 3 years - the 4th year will be expiring and possibly more tradeable. The guy is always hurt, plays soft and is paid almost as much as our captain and Bridges combined. He spaces the floor - that’s great - but his mentality on and off the court doesn’t fit with the culture we built. This is square peg in a round hole. This has massive failure potential on it - and if it fails, we destroyed any window of winning a title with Brunson.
Not many people seem to dislike the trade and except yourself and the usual suspects.
Didn't you hate the Brunson trade too?
Melo, you have receipts on this?
So, we should have stayed the course with Randle and Donte? That was a true contender with Brunson? Not sure of that either. And then Randle was due an extension or new contract.
E-Balla wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:E-Balla wrote:KAT doesn't make you a true 5 out team because he can't defend. Might as well play small ball with Randle. And you'll still have 5 out spacing with no interior defense and good rebounding.
If you're going to sacrifice defense, you go with overwhelming offense and KAT gives us true 5 out, low amount of touches per game relative to output (53 per game vs 72 per game for Randle), and the three point shooting is at 40% on 6 attempts per game the last 5 seasons.
Our halfcourt offense should be an absolute buzzsaw, all they need to do is manage a top 10 defense which they probably will. The Nuggets won the title with the 15th rated defense, and 5th best offense.
0/4
1/6
2/9
1/5
0/8
4/5
1/6
KAT from deep the last 9 games of his playoff run. So overwhelming offensively I mean what are they going to do when Big Purr is shooting 20% from deep. So fearful.
E-Balla wrote:KnixinSix wrote:E-Balla wrote:KAT doesn't make you a true 5 out team because he can't defend. Might as well play small ball with Randle. And you'll still have 5 out spacing with no interior defense and good rebounding.
Many metrics and the eyeball test of how he played vs Jokic and KD in the playoffs would seem to strongly refute that.
KAT looked good vs Jokic because he was smoking wide open jumpers that KAT as part of their defensive scheme gave to Jokic. He scored 59 points on 55 shots guarded by KAT despite shooting 4-21 from deep. Leaving Jokic to take wide open 3s and praying he misses isn't great defense.
And he guarded KD only in game one. KD had 31 on 11/17 shooting and they took KAT off as the primary defender.
On top of all of that he's not a PF for us he's a C. KAT at C was the worst defensive player in the league for almost a decade. It's easier to hide him with Gobert and Reid behind him but now he's the backbone of our defense.
There's a reason Minny felt safe moving him, and it's because quite frankly if he wasn't on the roster they go to the Finals.
KnixinSix wrote:
Ok I guess you know best then and better than a front office that is likely going to go down as one of the best front offices in Knick history.
EBalla.....Randle was a flawed superstar too you know.
One who had 0 high level playoff performances vs KAT who may not have played great vs Dallas but had two very strong series vs KD and Jokic the two rounds before.
KAT has had good to great games in the playoffs, Randle has literally had 0.
Oh and KATs efficiency ratings on offense are through the roof and he is not ball dominant like Randle is.
So yes KAT is not without risk but he is very likely an upgrade and a better fit next to Brunson.
SelbyCobra wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:
Lmao, Cmon guys, answers to all these hypothetical are already out there. He grew up rooting for the Knicks his whole life, he loved going into the city the same way most suburban Jersey kids do, and he even played at the Rucker as a kid.
Not that google Ai is right ever but it said Kat didn’t play at dyckman. Can you cite him saying he did? I probably can’t find it.
Just from personal experience growing up in Jersey, we didn’t spend a whole lot of time going to New York and most of my class ended up in Hoboken or stayed in the burbs and not the city. I know this isn’t universal but where Kat grew up is like 30 mins south of me now and There’s a lot Philly people. I wouldn’t be too shocked if he was just a Knicks fan that didn’t go to the city a ton cuz Jersey is filled with them. The city isn’t for everyone and we see this with athletes all the time.
https://nypost.com/2015/05/18/karl-anthony-towns-on-possibly-going-from-knicks-fan-to-savior/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=pasteboard_appSerby: I’m asking all these Knicks questions because Knicks fans are praying that you wind up with the Knicks.
Towns: It would be an honor, not only as a player, but as a Knicks fan, to be able to play for that organization. It’s gonna be, I guess a childhood dream — rooting for the Knicks all this time, and the next thing you know, you hear an organization call your name to go out there and give it your best shot. I think it would be very cool, and really very honored and blessed to be able to play for them.
Serby: What are your favorite New York City things?
Towns: I like the scenery. Times Square is awesome. Being able to walk around, I love going to New York, have some pizza. When I was younger, I played in Rucker Park once, it was awesome. There’s so much history behind New York, and so much history that it takes people lifetimes to realize it all.
KnixinSix wrote:Moose wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
By the sniff test it seems Pels are absolutely desperate for an elite rim protector to complement their stars. Mitch has been in DPoY discussions when healthy. They probably feel they would have a huge jump in overall performance with that kind of player.
3 team deal perhaps? Maybe get back one of Isaiah Stwart or Nick Richards?
Who says no? (Works in modern CBA trade checker):
Knicks Receive:
Walker Kessler
Brice Sensabaugh
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl
Jazz Receive:
Brandon Ingram
Pacome Dadiet
Karlo Matkovic
2026 Pelicans 1st round pick, top 5 protected (Mil swap rights)
2027 Knicks second round pick (via OKC, HOU, MIA, or IND)
Pelicans Receive:
Mitch Robinson
John Collins
Knicks 2026 second round pick (via DET, IND, or MIA)
Please note that though the Pelicans are trading a 1st round pick, they are essentially moving back to the early part of Round 2.
Not bad ....Knicks would likely do that. But why do Jazz get so much value for giving up John Collins?
Hes_On_Fire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:The general rule is that if you feel uneasy or just plain bad about a trade then it likely isn’t a good trade.
This trade has had mixed reactions across the board here, in the general public, in basketball media, etc.
We locked into an absolutely horrible contract for a minimum of the next 3 years - the 4th year will be expiring and possibly more tradeable. The guy is always hurt, plays soft and is paid almost as much as our captain and Bridges combined. He spaces the floor - that’s great - but his mentality on and off the court doesn’t fit with the culture we built. This is square peg in a round hole. This has massive failure potential on it - and if it fails, we destroyed any window of winning a title with Brunson.
Not many people seem to dislike the trade and except yourself and the usual suspects.
Didn't you hate the Brunson trade too?
Melo, you have receipts on this?
So, we should have stayed the course with Randle and Donte? That was a true contender with Brunson? Not sure of that either. And then Randle was due an extension or new contract.
Karl Anthony Towns is not the player you think of when trying to elevate into a title contender.
I wasn’t a Randle fan, but this is a more expensive Randle in some ways, just with a different mentality.
The usual suspects lol. The respected basketball media - not Kendrick Perkins - is lukewarm on the trade. Mixed reactions on this forum and in the media as I said. Didn’t say everyone disliked it. I said mixed reactions. You’re better off sticking to making troll posts if you’re write bull.
And yeah, please Melo bring up the receipts of me wanting Brunson way before anyone even considered wanting him. Let’s see those receipts. They’re there. Now let’s see yours. Probably a lot more bull than mine. A lot more. But yours is under the guise of being ‘positive’, right? Gtfo.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:E-Balla wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
There's very few 5 out teams, you gotta pay the cost to have one at this point.
KAT doesn't make you a true 5 out team because he can't defend. Might as well play small ball with Randle. And you'll still have 5 out spacing with no interior defense and good rebounding.
If you're going to sacrifice defense, you go with overwhelming offense and KAT gives us true 5 out, low amount of touches per game relative to output (53 per game vs 72 per game for Randle), and the three point shooting is at 40% on 6 attempts per game the last 5 seasons.
Our halfcourt offense should be an absolute buzzsaw, all they need to do is manage a top 10 defense which they probably will. The Nuggets won the title with the 15th rated defense, and 5th best offense.
3toheadmelo wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Not many people seem to dislike the trade and except yourself and the usual suspects.
Didn't you hate the Brunson trade too?
Melo, you have receipts on this?
So, we should have stayed the course with Randle and Donte? That was a true contender with Brunson? Not sure of that either. And then Randle was due an extension or new contract.
Karl Anthony Towns is not the player you think of when trying to elevate into a title contender.
I wasn’t a Randle fan, but this is a more expensive Randle in some ways, just with a different mentality.
The usual suspects lol. The respected basketball media - not Kendrick Perkins - is lukewarm on the trade. Mixed reactions on this forum and in the media as I said. Didn’t say everyone disliked it. I said mixed reactions. You’re better off sticking to making troll posts if you’re write bull.
And yeah, please Melo bring up the receipts of me wanting Brunson way before anyone even considered wanting him. Let’s see those receipts. They’re there. Now let’s see yours. Probably a lot more bull than mine. A lot more. But yours is under the guise of being ‘positive’, right? Gtfo.
Hey I’m not getting involved in this for the record
KnixinSix wrote:BrOnXKing1 wrote:Wildcat wrote:Anyone disappointed KAT still hasn't said anything other than his emo "...".
Dont think hes trilled about the trade. Minnesota was his home last 9yrs, its a low key city. Now there is a microscope on Kat and the pressure just went up many notches
Think he is excited as heck actually
E-Balla wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
Ok I guess you know best then and better than a front office that is likely going to go down as one of the best front offices in Knick history.
Yes. Yes I do. The **** you thought I was gonna be humble? I been here over a decade and I've predicted bad moves before we made them and good moves before we made them.
I wanted Brunson long before y'all. I said we needed to take Haliburton if we got the first overall pick. I said go for Donovan Mitchell over Frank if we wanted a defensive G. Let's not act like I don't know hoops and watch way more basketball than anyone in our front office.EBalla.....Randle was a flawed superstar too you know.
Randle is getting flawed star money. $28.9 mil.
KAT is getting MVP money. Here's the players with more guaranteed money than KAT in 2027: Finals and ECF MVP Jaylen Brown, perennial first team all NBA and MVP finalist Jayson Tatum, 2x MVP Nikola Jokic, 2x MVP Giannis Antetokoumpo, Anthony Davis.One who had 0 high level playoff performances vs KAT who may not have played great vs Dallas but had two very strong series vs KD and Jokic the two rounds before.
KAT has had good to great games in the playoffs, Randle has literally had 0.
Oh and KATs efficiency ratings on offense are through the roof and he is not ball dominant like Randle is.
So yes KAT is not without risk but he is very likely an upgrade and a better fit next to Brunson.
Why are we comparing KAT to a guy making half his money? Do y'all not see how insane it is we're paying a guy MVP money and holding him to the standards of a guy making $29 mil like that's a win?
Wildcat wrote:KnixinSix wrote:BrOnXKing1 wrote:
Dont think hes trilled about the trade. Minnesota was his home last 9yrs, its a low key city. Now there is a microscope on Kat and the pressure just went up many notches
Think he is excited as heck actually
That seems opposite of what's being reported. And no one has ever meant excitement when typing in "...". I mean, Randle's wife was on it and I'm going to miss that support. This sulking is just intensifying the issues I've already had with KAT coming in.