Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Guano wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I'm actually thinking that it might be a mistake to move Mitch.
We have a solid sample size that shows that KAT really isn't a Center. Precious is okay, I am not sold on Sims. It might be prudent to keep Mitch.
never gonna beat the sham burner allegations
E-Balla wrote:aggo wrote:E-Balla wrote:We're making Brunson better? A stretch big that can't defend doesn't cost 60 million man. Be fr. There's a reason they took Naz over him, what he brings can be gotten at a way cheaper price point.
The reason people are mad isn't because we traded Randle. It's because we traded FOR KAT. 6th highest paid player in the league.
kat doesnt make 60m, yet.
but I will entertain your premise.
kat at 60m is a better deal than randle at 50m.
Another actual idiot I'm not responding to. Wanna make it 3 half brained snot nosed drooling halfwits talking to me?
KnixinSix wrote:DaGawd wrote:god shammgod wrote:
you're not like some of these fools who go along with everything, i know there's part of you that knows this sh*t is questionable at best
oh trust me i’m def not kat’s biggest fan… but the talent is undeniable.. and a change of scenery/circumstances might help him reach his potential. i don’t see the point of constantly **** on the trade before seeing it on the court
Perspective.
ibraheim718 wrote:The important question is do you think Timberwolves fans are upset about this trade? Maybe 10% of them.
DaGawd wrote:Guano wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I'm actually thinking that it might be a mistake to move Mitch.
We have a solid sample size that shows that KAT really isn't a Center. Precious is okay, I am not sold on Sims. It might be prudent to keep Mitch.
never gonna beat the sham burner allegations
def his alt account at this point
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:DaGawd wrote:oh trust me i’m def not kat’s biggest fan… but the talent is undeniable.. and a change of scenery/circumstances might help him reach his potential. i don’t see the point of constantly **** on the trade before seeing it on the court
i'll give it a chance but he's the one guy i really really didn't want. it just seems like one of those trades that the knicks do that'll just screw it all up somehow.
But it's not like we gave up the future with this move. What value did a one year Randle have around the league just have to ask yourself that? And its not like a situation where you just want Randle to expire either with the new cap structure either since we can replace the contract.
It has its risk but the Randle situation was also risky. They are pretty similar player IMO but KAT is more efficient and can play some more 5 so the fit is better imo.
Guano wrote:god shammgod wrote:TKKnicks1 wrote:Anyone a bit concerned on how Towns took the trade news? His IG post and then showing up to an event 12 hours later decked out in Wolves gear?! I know its a shock when you get traded but with this dudes history of being soft I'm hoping his emotional state is ready to embrace NY. Last thing we need is a disgruntled star creating drama and locker room tension. This unit has been really gelling last couple of seasons and they don't need that noise right now.
if you made a list of guys not built for new york he'd be close to or at the top. just pray i guess.
He isn't equipped to handle this
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:DaGawd wrote:oh trust me i’m def not kat’s biggest fan… but the talent is undeniable.. and a change of scenery/circumstances might help him reach his potential. i don’t see the point of constantly **** on the trade before seeing it on the court
i'll give it a chance but he's the one guy i really really didn't want. it just seems like one of those trades that the knicks do that'll just screw it all up somehow.
But it's not like we gave up the future with this move. What value did a one year Randle have around the league just have to ask yourself that? And its not like a situation where you just want Randle to expire either with the new cap structure either since we can replace the contract.
It has its risk but the Randle situation was also risky. They are pretty similar player IMO but KAT is more efficient and can play some more 5 so the fit is better imo.
TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
It was always meant to be Folksssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aggo wrote:The point of trading Mitch is quite simple
We are moving a guy that plays 50% of games for a guy that’ll play 85% of games
Guano wrote:DaGawd wrote:Guano wrote:
never gonna beat the sham burner allegations
def his alt account at this point
Real suss that he shows up talkin about needing to keep Mitch when rumors are heating up.
Capn'O wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I'm actually thinking that it might be a mistake to move Mitch.
We have a solid sample size that shows that KAT really isn't a Center. Precious is okay, I am not sold on Sims. It might be prudent to keep Mitch.
Like I said earlier... look at my roster.
He did pair well with Vanderbilt irl which bodes well for a Precious pairing but I want other defensive bigs next to him at all times.
I also might move him...
stuporman wrote:Already miss Divo...now he gets the Squidward meme for the Novaboys.
...and I'm not believing the he's 'not happy' crap...nope.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
KnixinSix wrote:aggo wrote:The point of trading Mitch is quite simple
We are moving a guy that plays 50% of games for a guy that’ll play 85% of games
Whos that 85% guy? Knick Richards?
Guano wrote:Would be very knicks if this trade imploded and randle ends up staying. Disgruntled and toxic as hell.
