Insane13 wrote:NoStatsGuy wrote:cheese318 wrote:
What did they **** up? This was a blessing in disguise. Donovan Mitchell would just made the NYK stuck in the middle and would have cost us most of our assets to get him. So what do we do from there? Bank on free agency which has been such a great prospect for NYK in the past 15 years. Id much rather trade all our assets and some for a super star and I just don’t view Donovan on that upper tier level. Can Donovan push this NYK team to title contender as constructed? I just don’t see it. How many conference championships did he make in UTA? He makes so much more sense for CLE. They have a roster that’s going to be ready to compete with him as a great scoring punch
dont even bother reasoning.
if the knicks land mitchell, people here say the knicks always overpay for mediocracy or "quick fix". if the knicks dont lad him, they cant get any stars. We cant do right.
i completely agree, that his was a blessing in disguise. Cle has a great core now. Idk about the garland, mitchell combo and how they gonna defend in the playoffs. but i dont think mitchell and brunson would've worked out well.
i dont care enough about the cavs to know, how good garland is. so i cant really judge it but im very suspicious about their defense
Garland better than brunson and younger. Plus the cavs have allen and mobley down low they’ll be fine.
Wow this aged poorly.
Got directed to this thread by a link from RealGM wiretap in the KAT trade news
Some crazy bad takes here w/ the benefit of hindsight.
Ironic that Allen/Mobley got bullied by the Knicks in the 2023 and is the primary reason for their loss in that series.
In 2024, no one was worse than Garland in ending the Cavs season (watched it closely as a Celtics fan)
And, of course, Brunson is a fringe MVP candidate now -- still on a discount
IDK that they can deliver a championship, but on paper this Knicks team seems a lot better than 2 seasons past.