aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade
do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?
Stan culture is very toxic. This can go on for a while.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade
do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?

JayTWill wrote:mpharris36 wrote:E-Balla wrote:His career average is like 42% from the top of the key too. He's always killed from there.
whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.
MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.
I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.
Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?
He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.
mpharris36 wrote:JayTWill wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.
MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.
I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.
Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?
He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.
Mitch had horrible rim protecting numbers last year...chalking that up to small sample size and how much he was injured last year (and wasn't really in shape).

Hes_On_Fire wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:The people who keep going on and on about great KAT seem like they’re trying to convince themselves more than they’re trying to convince anyone else.
Look, fellas, most people around the league are lukewarm on this. This is not even close to a slam dunk. And the downside - injuries with gigantic immovable contract is so massive that this trade was simply not worth the risk.
But here we are.
The Knicks will Knick.
I also don’t want to hear about Leon Rose again. 98% of this guys transactions are simply acquiring his former players, family friends, or anyone connected to Thibs/Gersos or whatever his name is. It would be more impressive if he could think outside the box and not only acquire CAA clients or people Thibs baptized.
We basically went all in on the worst defensive center in the league that happens to be more injury prone than Mitchell Robinson. Yet the homers here think we crazy for not loving the move
A representation of what this trade has done.
Brought two ‘rivals’ together.
Fat Kat wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
I root for the Knicks and this is a Knicks forum. No non-Knicks matter. Randle’s pouting azz included.
You be rooting for your man’s Devin Vassell and mikal before he became a Knick in other threads. Don’t do that switching up schit with me cause I got receipts for days![]()
And we’re all rooting for KAT. Just because we don’t love the move like you doesn’t mean we ain’t rooting for him. Seems like it’s hard for you to differentiate from that. Carry on though.
I wanted to draft them because I knew they would be good. Never rooted for them or their teams. You got the receipts, show them.


Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.


aggo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.
we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C

aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade
do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?

mpharris36 wrote:JayTWill wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.
MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.
I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.
Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?
He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.
Mitch had horrible rim protecting numbers last year...chalking that up to small sample size and how much he was injured last year (and wasn't really in shape).
3toheadmelo wrote:aggo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.
we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C
Marc stein said we want to use KAT like how Boston uses KP. He’s gonna be playing C unfortunately. If we somehow win a chip with KAT playing the 5 I’ll post an public apology to you once a month for a whole year
2010 wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Fat Kat wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:You be rooting for your man’s Devin Vassell and mikal before he became a Knick in other threads. Don’t do that switching up schit with me cause I got receipts for days![]()
And we’re all rooting for KAT. Just because we don’t love the move like you doesn’t mean we ain’t rooting for him. Seems like it’s hard for you to differentiate from that. Carry on though.
I wanted to draft them because I knew they would be good. Never rooted for them or their teams. You got the receipts, show them.
I got you later this week when my computer gets fixed. Too buggy on my phone. You kept posting for years we should trade for mikal aka stanning for him. Posting pics of dude in a Knick jersey and the whole 9 yards. You was even mad we chose Knox over your boy and was upset about it. That’s stan culcha for you.


aggo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.
we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C
Fat Kat wrote:aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade
do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?
Stan culture is very toxic. This can go on for a while.

?