ImageImageImageImageImage

KAT To The Knicks Part 2

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 35,000
And1: 35,850
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#641 » by Fat Kat » Tue Oct 1, 2024 1:57 am

aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade

do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?


Stan culture is very toxic. This can go on for a while.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,632
And1: 116,585
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#642 » by mpharris36 » Tue Oct 1, 2024 1:58 am

JayTWill wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
E-Balla wrote:His career average is like 42% from the top of the key too. He's always killed from there.


whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.

MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.


I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.

Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?

He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.



Mitch had horrible rim protecting numbers last year...chalking that up to small sample size and how much he was injured last year (and wasn't really in shape).
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#643 » by aggo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 1:59 am

mpharris36 wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.

MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.


I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.

Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?

He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.



Mitch had horrible rim protecting numbers last year...chalking that up to small sample size and how much he was injured last year (and wasn't really in shape).


if u really want to fight the demons


go back farther than last year, and you'll be surprised by what you find.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,327
And1: 110,236
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#644 » by Capn'O » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:01 am

Hes_On_Fire wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Hes_On_Fire wrote:The people who keep going on and on about great KAT seem like they’re trying to convince themselves more than they’re trying to convince anyone else.

Look, fellas, most people around the league are lukewarm on this. This is not even close to a slam dunk. And the downside - injuries with gigantic immovable contract is so massive that this trade was simply not worth the risk.

But here we are.

The Knicks will Knick.

I also don’t want to hear about Leon Rose again. 98% of this guys transactions are simply acquiring his former players, family friends, or anyone connected to Thibs/Gersos or whatever his name is. It would be more impressive if he could think outside the box and not only acquire CAA clients or people Thibs baptized.

We basically went all in on the worst defensive center in the league that happens to be more injury prone than Mitchell Robinson. Yet the homers here think we crazy for not loving the move :lol:


Image

A representation of what this trade has done.

Brought two ‘rivals’ together.


Also Chanel and NoDope against you. Strange times.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,316
And1: 136,590
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#645 » by 3toheadmelo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:03 am

Fat Kat wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
I root for the Knicks and this is a Knicks forum. No non-Knicks matter. Randle’s pouting azz included.

You be rooting for your man’s Devin Vassell and mikal before he became a Knick in other threads. Don’t do that switching up schit with me cause I got receipts for days :lol:

And we’re all rooting for KAT. Just because we don’t love the move like you doesn’t mean we ain’t rooting for him. Seems like it’s hard for you to differentiate from that. Carry on though.


I wanted to draft them because I knew they would be good. Never rooted for them or their teams. You got the receipts, show them.

I got you later this week when my computer gets fixed. Too buggy on my phone. You kept posting for years we should trade for mikal aka stanning for him. Posting pics of dude in a Knick jersey and the whole 9 yards. You was even mad we chose Knox over your boy and was upset about it. That’s stan culcha for you.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,274
And1: 55,196
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#646 » by Deeeez Knicks » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:03 am

There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#647 » by aggo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:04 am

Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.

we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,528
And1: 42,737
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#648 » by 2010 » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:04 am

Read on Twitter
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Smart
2: White | Wallace | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,528
And1: 42,737
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#649 » by 2010 » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:05 am

Read on Twitter
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Smart
2: White | Wallace | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,316
And1: 136,590
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#650 » by 3toheadmelo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:08 am

aggo wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.

we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C

Marc stein said we want to use KAT like how Boston uses KP. He’s gonna be playing C unfortunately. If we somehow win a chip with KAT playing the 5 I’ll post an public apology to you once a month for a whole year :lol:
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#651 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:08 am

aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade

do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?


Image
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,547
And1: 1,671
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#652 » by JayTWill » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:10 am

mpharris36 wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
whichin theory makes him a great fit here offensively with OG and Mikal are +40% 3 point shooters from the corner. We are going to be a tough **** matchup with Brunson putting pressure in the mid range and rim with his floater.

MIkal and KAT are also pretty good in the mid range as well. OG wasn't half bad with his middy last year as well. That plays up in the playoffs when teams try to take away your strength and give up mid ranges for free.


I don't know why this post gave me hope after not loving the trade. I still have no idea how we will protect the rim but maybe I am being too pessimistic.

Speaking of rim protection does anyone know why opponents shot 66% at the rim against Mitch in the regular season and 68% in the playoffs? Those are terrible numbers for a defensive big. I know his numbers outside of rebounding have decreased over the last few years from field goal percentage to free throw percentage but is he no longer the rim protector we think he is?

He has gained weight and is less explosive but is the idea he is a great rim protector just in our heads or is something being missed in those numbers? I don't follow defensive metrics but I thought all of them favored him.



Mitch had horrible rim protecting numbers last year...chalking that up to small sample size and how much he was injured last year (and wasn't really in shape).


I checked and his rim protection numbers were bad before and after he returned from injury. I don't remember if Mitch was returning from injury/out of shape to start the season since it just seems like a continuous cycle at this point.
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#653 » by aggo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:10 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
aggo wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.

we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C

Marc stein said we want to use KAT like how Boston uses KP. He’s gonna be playing C unfortunately. If we somehow win a chip with KAT playing the 5 I’ll post an public apology to you once a month for a whole year :lol:

bro


you dont need to apologize for **** lmao


just enjoy the ride
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,571
And1: 43,061
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#654 » by TheGreenArrow » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:11 am

2010 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Brunson
Herb
Mikal
Og
Kat

Or

Brunson
Murphy
Mikal
Og
Kat

Either of those lineups and you can pretty much wrap the season up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Best team in the league and it isn’t even close!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 35,000
And1: 35,850
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#655 » by Fat Kat » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:12 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:You be rooting for your man’s Devin Vassell and mikal before he became a Knick in other threads. Don’t do that switching up schit with me cause I got receipts for days :lol:

And we’re all rooting for KAT. Just because we don’t love the move like you doesn’t mean we ain’t rooting for him. Seems like it’s hard for you to differentiate from that. Carry on though.


I wanted to draft them because I knew they would be good. Never rooted for them or their teams. You got the receipts, show them.

I got you later this week when my computer gets fixed. Too buggy on my phone. You kept posting for years we should trade for mikal aka stanning for him. Posting pics of dude in a Knick jersey and the whole 9 yards. You was even mad we chose Knox over your boy and was upset about it. That’s stan culcha for you.


:lol: Don’t change it up now. “ “You be rooting for your man’s Devin Vassell and mikal before he became a Knick in other threads”. Show me the receipts.

Computer broken :lol:
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
User avatar
SelbyCobra
RealGM
Posts: 10,462
And1: 20,551
Joined: May 25, 2011

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#656 » by SelbyCobra » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:13 am

Thinking about it, I'm not sure there's been a single transaction in the Leon era that received a universal initial reaction of anything above "lukewarm".

Everything from drafting Quickley, to signing Brunson, to trading for Hart, to signing Donte & iHart, to acquiring OG & Bridges. All of it was met with something on the spectrum from LOLKNICKS to "meh" to "I see it but it's still highly questionable", but never anything above that. While some of us may have had strong positive opinions on these moves, I don't think Leon has had a single general consensus slam dunk home run type of transaction in his time here.

EDIT: Actually, I think the McBride contract might be one.
Image
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#657 » by aggo » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:13 am

trading mitch doesn't make a lot of sense.


even if hes unhappy about becoming a 15mpg player, it literally might save his entire career being stuck playing 15minutes for a year.
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,274
And1: 55,196
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#658 » by Deeeez Knicks » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:14 am

aggo wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:There's good points why this trade may work, and good points why it may not work. Its really tough to say until we see it on the floor. Theoretically if it does work out with KAT at C it gives the Knicks more upside.

we dont even know if KAT is going to be playing C


He's going to have to play minutes at C, especially with Mitch out, and to get our best players on the floor.

Ideally we play him minutes at both of PF and C and mix it up. Against a team like the Celtics we are going to need to match up against them with KAT at C
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
Im Coming Home
RealGM
Posts: 27,557
And1: 20,261
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Location: The Island
       

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#659 » by Im Coming Home » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:15 am

Fat Kat wrote:
aggo wrote:its day 2 of the trade

do you think the randle Stans can keep this energy up?


Stan culture is very toxic. This can go on for a while.

If only the mods didn't watch and do nothing about the obvious trolling and nonsense. But if the last 3-4 years is anything to go by, nothing will be done, and trolls will be allowed to be trolls.
RGM Knicks BAF- Houston Rockets
Image

PG: Cunningham | Small | Ja. Butler
SG: Au. Thompson | Ja. Butler |
SF: B.Ingram | Bullock | LaRavia
PF: Porter Jr. | GG Jackson | Love
C: Jackson Jr. | Eubanks
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,022
And1: 21,020
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#660 » by stuporman » Tue Oct 1, 2024 2:16 am

Oh how cute...some Wolves media heads think Randle will play defense. They translate 'toughness' into playing defense...haha, they will learn.

Randle is the toughest player in the league with the ball in his hands but we have to stress 'with the ball in his hands' part of it. I've never seen a player have such a wide spectrum of energy and 'toughness' from ball in his hands to the other end of the court. His defensive zombie mode is absolutely mind boggling for someone with his athletic gifts.

Talk all you want about KAT's defensive ability, sure, but from what I have seen he tries on defense, Randle doesn't except for rare instances. Who knows why he chooses those rare moments to actually try but it's so rare I actually notice it when he does as the anomaly that it is.

If Randle goes to Minnesota and finally tries all the time on defense, it's even more disrespectful to the Knicks organization, his former teammates and the fans who bleed blue and orange. He could have tried all along but chose not to until he gets traded away? Wow...ok. bye guy.

This isn't me 'hating' Randle, this is me stating facts whether his stans like it or not and if you are on this board saying you will root for the Knicks until they play Randle then you ARE stans of the player, not fans of the Knicks.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job

Return to New York Knicks