DaMplsKid wrote:frankenwolf wrote:When I saw this yesterday morning, I was not a happy camper. My first thought was "All the SOB's who wanted a Randle for KAT trade finally got their wish." I will miss KAT and his smile, his shot and his team first attitude. Reflection on this trade still doesn't make me happy, as I'm pretty sure the Wolves as constructed could have won a championship this year.
I do understand why it happened, because they are afraid of that LT and the second apron restrictions. This is a business, in the end, and no matter who is running it, they would like to not spend any extra money if they can help it. KAT wound up being extra money. I just hope all you that despise KAT are wiling to eat crow when he comes back to the cities and puts up 70 against "a better defense, now that KAT is gone."
Let's see what this team can do, but I don't think they made it better for the short term.Spoiler:
Two things: What make you think with Kat being a player we need and count on have us winning a championship? When has KAT shown to be part of a winning team? (please don't say last year) With the way the team was constructed last we should of won if KAT could dominate PJ F'in Washington.
Second point. I could see Kat coming back and lighting it up for 70pts but from my experience that means we win. Look at KAT's 62 point game last year. I could also see KAT picking up two quick fouls and sitting for most of the first half.
One: Why not say last year? It's progression and last year's team was different than any he was on previously. The Wolves might have won the Dallas series if Ant had dominated Luka F'in Doncic, so maybe it's Ant's fault.
Two: sure, but we are hanging our identity hat on being a more defensive team, so, theoretically, he shouldn't get us for 70.