Port-Chi-LAC

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,339
And1: 4,265
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#1 » by pipfan » Tue Oct 1, 2024 5:58 pm

Bulls send Vuc and LBall to Port, along with the Blazer future 1st back to them
Bulls get Ayton, PJ Tucker (buyout) and 2 seconds from Port

Clips send PJ Tucker to Bulls
Clips get RWill

Blazers send Ayton to Chi along with 2 seconds and RWill to Clips
Blazers get Vuc, Ball and the 1st back

Bulls roll the dice that Ayton is a solid center and improve their D

Clips hope RWill can be a bench big-gamble but worth it

Blazers add mentors for Henderson and Clingan, and save $ plus get their pick back
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,258
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#2 » by tester551 » Tue Oct 1, 2024 6:13 pm

pipfan wrote:Bulls send Vuc and LBall to Port, along with the Blazer future 1st back to them
Bulls get Ayton, PJ Tucker (buyout) and 2 seconds from Port

Clips send PJ Tucker to Bulls
Clips get RWill

Blazers send Ayton to Chi along with 2 seconds and RWill to Clips
Blazers get Vuc, Ball and the 1st back

Bulls roll the dice that Ayton is a solid center and improve their D

Clips hope RWill can be a bench big-gamble but worth it

Blazers add mentors for Henderson and Clingan, and save $ plus get their pick back


Clips say yes as fast as they can. They get a remarkable deal here.

Decent trade for the Bulls. I think they do it.

I don't see the point for Portland to do this. You downgrade talent and give up 2 seconds to save ~$20M in '25-'26 and get the pick returned (which may end up being worth 2 seconds).... There MAY be an argument here if Ball could play - but I still don't like the fit for Portland.
I'd stay with the status quo and assume that there are better deals that will occur later in the season.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,354
And1: 9,901
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#3 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Oct 1, 2024 6:13 pm

I think this is light for PDX and would prefer to keep RWIII and dump him after building his value.

Ayton + Thybulle for Vuc + Ball + PDX FRP would be my counter.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,339
And1: 4,265
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#4 » by pipfan » Tue Oct 1, 2024 6:42 pm

Would LAC want Thybulle?
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#5 » by JRoy » Tue Oct 1, 2024 7:11 pm

pipfan wrote:Bulls send Vuc and LBall to Port, along with the Blazer future 1st back to them
Bulls get Ayton, PJ Tucker (buyout) and 2 seconds from Port

Clips send PJ Tucker to Bulls
Clips get RWill

Blazers send Ayton to Chi along with 2 seconds and RWill to Clips
Blazers get Vuc, Ball and the 1st back

Bulls roll the dice that Ayton is a solid center and improve their D

Clips hope RWill can be a bench big-gamble but worth it

Blazers add mentors for Henderson and Clingan, and save $ plus get their pick back


Hard no from POR.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 1,199
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#6 » by Walton1one » Tue Oct 1, 2024 7:38 pm

Ayton to CHI for Vucevic\Ball and their 1st back could work (value-wise), however, I don't see POR doing that mind you, but IMO it is on the low side of acceptable.

It would have to include more players though, I can't see POR going over the luxury tax to take back Ball\Vucevic.
POR is $3.7 under
CHI $4.7 under

Ball\Vucevic for Ayton adds $7.3, taking POR over the luxury tax, a no no for a 21-win team.

Ayton\Thubulle for Vucevic\Ball\Phillips & POR 1st back could work. POR would have to release\offload a player.

Sending out (2) 2nd round picks is a non-starter, not sending additional value to trade away Ayton, absolutely zero reason to do so, he has only 2 years left, POR is under the luxury tax and he can take up the starter minutes while Clingan (who only played 22min/game LY) gets his conditioning up\feet wet this year

RW3 gets dealt for nothing? Nice deal for the Clips. No reason for him to be included in this deal, WHEN he is traded it will be for value back, not as a throw in\salary dump. If he stays healthy he could fetch a decent return at the trade deadline and if not, his value won't be any lower, No reason for POR to trade him now unless another team wants to make it worthwhile.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,354
And1: 9,901
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#7 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Oct 1, 2024 8:53 pm

PDX OUT - DeAndre Ayton + Matisse Thybulle
PDX IN - Nikola Vucevic + Lonzo Ball + 2 SRP via HOU + PDX FRP via CHI

CHI OUT - Nikola Vucevic + Lonzo Ball + PDX FRP
CHI IN - DeAndre Ayton + Jeff Green

HOU OUT - Jeff Green + 2 SRP
HOU IN - Matisse Thybulle

Could something like that work?
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,976
And1: 2,369
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#8 » by ChettheJet » Tue Oct 1, 2024 10:43 pm

JRoy wrote:
Hard no from POR.



Like a hanging curveball I saw that one coming before I rolled down.

The only selling point of the original trade is cutting money off the 2nd year of Ayton. If Clingon makes quick progress Vucevic isn't going to be happy going to a reserve role a month after stating he wants to play a couple of years after his contract runs out. If Lonzo Ball is healthy PORT has absolutely no room to play him, he brings plenty to the Bulls.

the second idea is not that great for the Bulls either. Jeff Green is no more useful to a retooling team than PJ Tucker. They've already got Torrey Craig to bring energy off the bench while they see how much Julian Phillips has or if they try Matas Buzelsi.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 1,199
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#9 » by Walton1one » Tue Oct 1, 2024 11:15 pm

I would think that the selling point is CHI wanting Ayton, he is 7? years younger than Vucevic and the better player (IMO), has 2 years left on his deal (like Vucevic) and under this new CBA is likely not going to get as big of a contract as he has now, so, maybe, depending on your outlook of him, could be a value on his next contract.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,788
And1: 10,446
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Port-Chi-LAC 

Post#10 » by Myth » Wed Oct 2, 2024 1:45 am

BlazersBroncos wrote:I think this is light for PDX and would prefer to keep RWIII and dump him after building his value.

Ayton + Thybulle for Vuc + Ball + PDX FRP would be my counter.

I don’t see that counter as much better.

Return to Trades and Transactions