Looks like the board is picking up again on how to move Ingram.
NOP reduces payroll and gets a center capable of holding defensively until Missi improves. And gets a quasi center/PF for when Williamson gets hurt again.
Utah gets a scorer/play-maker to ride along with Markkanen. Long term deal worked out ahead of the trade.
NOP sends Ingram
Utah sends Kessler/Collins
Utah: George/Sexton/Ingram/Markkanen/Hendricks
NOP: Murray/Jones/Williamson/Collins/Kessler
Utah/NOP
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Utah/NOP
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Utah/NOP
No chance Collins would start in NO over a guy like Trey, and you have Zion as a SF? Kessler is bad fit with Zion, if NO is going to go with a tradition non shooting center he at least least to be able to plus passer that work a little be as a hub otherwise that offense cannot really function. If NO cannot get a center that fits via trade I think just seeing what they have in house is the better option than wasting assets on guys that just cannot work.
Re: Utah/NOP
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,819
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Utah/NOP
I think the Pels may have to settle for something like this, but I don't know that they're desperate enough to eat Collins deal before the season even begins.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions