Ingram/1st for Ayton

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,635
And1: 1,643
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#1 » by Bentley1225 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 3:32 pm

Ill offer this idea based on
-The Pelicans are over tax apron and have a need for a starting 5
-The Blazers are rebuilding and have Williams + Clingan to play the 5

Based on that ill offer a straight swap with picks

To New Orleans
-DeAndre Ayton (2 years, $69.5 million)

To Portland
-Brandon Ingram (1 year, $36 million)
-2028 1st round pick (some form of protection)


Why?
-The Pelicans add a starting calibre 5 to round out starting 5 while they get under tax apron.
-The Blazers create more cap flexibility in summer of 2025 while picking up a 1st and letting Williams become starter while Clinton develops.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,587
And1: 6,233
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#2 » by gswhoops » Wed Oct 2, 2024 3:34 pm

That first is going the wrong way.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,257
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#3 » by tester551 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 3:51 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:Ill offer this idea based on
-The Pelicans are over tax apron and have a need for a starting 5
-The Blazers are rebuilding and have Williams + Clingan to play the 5

Based on that ill offer a straight swap with picks

To New Orleans
-DeAndre Ayton (2 years, $69.5 million)

To Portland
-Brandon Ingram (1 year, $36 million)
-2028 1st round pick (some form of protection)


Why?
-The Pelicans add a starting calibre 5 to round out starting 5 while they get under tax apron.
-The Blazers create more cap flexibility in summer of 2025 while picking up a 1st and letting Williams become starter while Clinton develops.

Portland says yes based on value.... and immediately trade Grant elsewhere.

BI and Grant are too similar to tie up that much money for both.

Portland doesn't have a big enough interest where they would SEND a pick with DA for BI
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,612
And1: 6,605
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#4 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Wed Oct 2, 2024 3:59 pm

gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.


Yeah... Of course that isn't really the direction Portland is trying to go but even with no pick involved this is a cant say no deal for us.

I don't really understand what is going on with NOP and Ingram. If I were them I would be looking to move CJ instead and try to keep Ingram.

So maybe something more like CJ+pick for Ayton or maybe get RW3 involved instead? I dunno, tough time of year for trades everyone wants to see what they have first.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#5 » by JRoy » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:06 pm

gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.


Laughable that POR would send a FRP.

NOP can just let Ingram expire if they choose not to pay him and make a move for Ayton that does not include FRP.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#6 » by louc1970 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:21 pm

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.



I don't really understand what is going on with NOP and Ingram. If I were them I would be looking to move CJ instead and try to keep Ingram.

.

Agreed. Wonder how much Portland wants to move Ayton? With Portland having no free agents for next year (Jabari Walker only player on expiring contract), would Portland extend goodwill and swap McCollum/Mil 25 FRP for Ayton.
Reasoning: Portland money is already spent whether it be Ayton or McCollum. McCollum drops to $30m next year when Ayton goes up to $35.5, so a financial savings is met. Unlikely Ayton is resigned, and McCollum can finish where he started.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#7 » by JRoy » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:35 pm

louc1970 wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.



I don't really understand what is going on with NOP and Ingram. If I were them I would be looking to move CJ instead and try to keep Ingram.

.

Agreed. Wonder how much Portland wants to move Ayton? With Portland having no free agents for next year (Jabari Walker only player on expiring contract), would Portland extend goodwill and swap McCollum/Mil 25 FRP for Ayton.
Reasoning: Portland money is already spent whether it be Ayton or McCollum. McCollum drops to $30m next year when Ayton goes up to $35.5, so a financial savings is met. Unlikely Ayton is resigned, and McCollum can finish where he started.


I understand the reasoning, but cannot see POR wanting a CJ reunion tour. A decade straight of tiny offense only guards is enough.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,257
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#8 » by tester551 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:44 pm

louc1970 wrote:Agreed. Wonder how much Portland wants to move Ayton?

I'd say it's neutral. Portland is not looking to move Ayton, but would not say no to a good deal.

louc1970 wrote:would Portland extend goodwill and swap McCollum/Mil 25 FRP for Ayton.
Reasoning: Portland money is already spent whether it be Ayton or McCollum. McCollum drops to $30m next year when Ayton goes up to $35.5, so a financial savings is met. Unlikely Ayton is resigned, and McCollum can finish where he started.

Negative.
I don't see this as a good deal for Portland.
CJ does absolutely nothing for the Blazers at this point. The ~$5M in savings isn't worth this trade
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,901
And1: 1,238
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#9 » by wemby » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:52 pm

Ayton's contract is a negative asset, Portland would have to pay for someone to take it off their hands. So of course Pelicans won't give up a better player on an expiring deal PLUS a first for him, that's just ridiculous value. I understand Blazers not giving up picks to get rid of a bad contract at this point in their rebuild, but value wise definitely the first is going the wrong way and just one may not be enough.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,814
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#10 » by jbk1234 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 4:53 pm

If the Pelicans trade for Ayton, they better be sure he's the answer at the 5 as it's going to be next to impossible for them to upgrade Ayton down the road due to his salary.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,788
And1: 10,446
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#11 » by Myth » Wed Oct 2, 2024 5:27 pm

JRoy wrote:
louc1970 wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:

I don't really understand what is going on with NOP and Ingram. If I were them I would be looking to move CJ instead and try to keep Ingram.

.

Agreed. Wonder how much Portland wants to move Ayton? With Portland having no free agents for next year (Jabari Walker only player on expiring contract), would Portland extend goodwill and swap McCollum/Mil 25 FRP for Ayton.
Reasoning: Portland money is already spent whether it be Ayton or McCollum. McCollum drops to $30m next year when Ayton goes up to $35.5, so a financial savings is met. Unlikely Ayton is resigned, and McCollum can finish where he started.


I understand the reasoning, but cannot see POR wanting a CJ reunion tour. A decade straight of tiny offense only guards is enough.

Also, CJ is too good to bench, and our young guards need minutes to develop.

I think people see 4 centers on Portland and Ayton's money, and think that means they should get rid of him, but RWIII is unreliable with health, Clingan doesn't have experience to know how he handles big minutes, and Duop just isn't a good enough player. In a sense, I view the main rotation being Ayton and Clingan, with RWIII only getting minutes to re-coup value before a trade, and Duop being a 3rd string injury replacement guy.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,058
And1: 17,575
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#12 » by babyjax13 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 6:32 pm

JRoy wrote:
gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.


Laughable that POR would send a FRP.

NOP can just let Ingram expire if they choose not to pay him and make a move for Ayton that does not include FRP.

Well, Portland shouldn't trade picks - don't think anyone is arguing that - but on value I think Portland would owe whatever it takes to dump Ayton's last year (probably a first) plus whatever Ingram is worth (a first or two). But yah, Ayton is going to be a Blazer until he expires unless they can swap him for a different bad player.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#13 » by JRoy » Wed Oct 2, 2024 6:42 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.


Laughable that POR would send a FRP.

NOP can just let Ingram expire if they choose not to pay him and make a move for Ayton that does not include FRP.

Well, Portland shouldn't trade picks - don't think anyone is arguing that - but on value I think Portland would owe whatever it takes to dump Ayton's last year (probably a first) plus whatever Ingram is worth (a first or two). But yah, Ayton is going to be a Blazer until he expires unless they can swap him for a different bad player.


Not to POR it isn’t, especially for a phony star like Ingram.

Hard pass.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,058
And1: 17,575
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#14 » by babyjax13 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 6:53 pm

JRoy wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Laughable that POR would send a FRP.

NOP can just let Ingram expire if they choose not to pay him and make a move for Ayton that does not include FRP.

Well, Portland shouldn't trade picks - don't think anyone is arguing that - but on value I think Portland would owe whatever it takes to dump Ayton's last year (probably a first) plus whatever Ingram is worth (a first or two). But yah, Ayton is going to be a Blazer until he expires unless they can swap him for a different bad player.


Not to POR it isn’t, especially for a phony star like Ingram.

Hard pass.


Okay, well that's not really responding to what I said, which was that in a vacuum New Orleans is owed value but Portland isn't in a position where this kind of trade makes sense.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,074
And1: 12,890
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#15 » by brackdan70 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 7:04 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:Ill offer this idea based on
-The Pelicans are over tax apron and have a need for a starting 5
-The Blazers are rebuilding and have Williams + Clingan to play the 5

Based on that ill offer a straight swap with picks

To New Orleans
-DeAndre Ayton (2 years, $69.5 million)

To Portland
-Brandon Ingram (1 year, $36 million)
-2028 1st round pick (some form of protection)


Why?
-The Pelicans add a starting calibre 5 to round out starting 5 while they get under tax apron.
-The Blazers create more cap flexibility in summer of 2025 while picking up a 1st and letting Williams become starter while Clinton develops.

The value is off with the first.
I think given all the circumstances a protected first probably should be going the other way. Ingram is a higher impact, better player, higher upside than Ayton. If it’s only about cap flexibility for Portland then I get them not wanting to give up a first though.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Toine85
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,395
And1: 104
Joined: Jun 05, 2001
Location: In the Knicks' Front Office
       

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#16 » by Toine85 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 7:24 pm

gswhoops wrote:That first is going the wrong way.


Yup...
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,327
And1: 8,581
Joined: Jul 16, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#17 » by jazzfan1971 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 7:43 pm

I have trouble seeing Ayton worth more than ingram.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
lordjeff05
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 841
Joined: Mar 01, 2010

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#18 » by lordjeff05 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 9:35 pm

A couple of things...

First off, the trade makes no sense from the Pels perspective. Ingram is a better player on a shorter contract, why would they include a first? I'd do Ingram for Ayton straight up but that's as far as I go. If the Pels are willing to give up a pick to ge a 5, they have other options that are less risky. I'm actually a big believer in Ayton's fit wiht the Pels but I realize there is a considerable amount of risk.

For those confused as to why the Pels haven't agreed to a deal for Ingram, you need to realize a)he's looking for 50 million a year and b) signing him makes it virtually impossible to resign Trey Murphy. Most people believe Trey is a better long term fit next to Z as he is a much more willing shooter. The problem is Ingram has more upside.

If Ingram can return to his 2019/2020 3 point usage then I'm good with resigning him. We are talking another 3 three pointers a game here. Heck if he had shot them last year he'd already have his money.

In this scenario Id def pull the trigger on a CJ plus a first for Ayton and try and trade Trey at the deadline for assets. That sounds crazy for most Pels fans but if BI is averaging 23-25 game and getting up 5 or 6 threes then hes a better fit for the team's upside than Trey.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,314
And1: 9,877
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#19 » by penbeast0 » Wed Oct 2, 2024 10:06 pm

If New Orleans really thinks they can resign Ingram; maybe they can send Trey Murphy to Portland for Donovan Clingan. Clingan is as NBA ready as any college player from last year, led his team to a title, and gives the defense (if not the outside game) that New Orleans is looking for. Portland does it despite Clingan being younger because they commit to Ayton and Murphy is the more valuable player in the league the way it exists today.

Get a commitment from Ingram first or ignore this whole idea of course.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ingram/1st for Ayton 

Post#20 » by JRoy » Wed Oct 2, 2024 11:01 pm

penbeast0 wrote:If New Orleans really thinks they can resign Ingram; maybe they can send Trey Murphy to Portland for Donovan Clingan. Clingan is as NBA ready as any college player from last year, led his team to a title, and gives the defense (if not the outside game) that New Orleans is looking for. Portland does it despite Clingan being younger because they commit to Ayton and Murphy is the more valuable player in the league the way it exists today.

Get a commitment from Ingram first or ignore this whole idea of course.


POR has no business dealing Clingan for Murphy. Ayton likely has no long term future in the Rose City and Clingan hopefully will earn that.

Murphy is a fine player but he will be earning his first non-rookie contract soon and POR should not be in a hurry to add big salaries until Grant/Simons/DA can be offloaded.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.

Return to Trades and Transactions