bulls and nets
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
bulls and nets
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,496
- And1: 99
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
bulls and nets
chi trades: lavine, 2025 #1 (por)
bky trades: simmons, wilson
Bulls get out from lavine's contract........Nets pick up a first for their rebuild and can hope to flip lavine later for maybe another rebuilding asset
bky trades: simmons, wilson
Bulls get out from lavine's contract........Nets pick up a first for their rebuild and can hope to flip lavine later for maybe another rebuilding asset
Re: bulls and nets
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: bulls and nets
What is the goal of getting out of Lavine's contract? To get cap space to sell to get a first like the one they are giving up here? Teams rarely just pay to dump salary for no clear reason. Dodge the tax or clear space to sign better players...sure....but to pay to dump LaVine so they can do what next year?
I think the Bulls ride it out and hope that LaVine performs enough to not have to pay to move him, and if he doesn't then he expires next year. They can be bad with him to avoid conveying their pick.
I think the Bulls ride it out and hope that LaVine performs enough to not have to pay to move him, and if he doesn't then he expires next year. They can be bad with him to avoid conveying their pick.
Re: bulls and nets
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,975
- And1: 2,369
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: bulls and nets
This could have been done for the past year and a half and didn't happen. So for the umteenth time
yes it's great to get the expiring contract for Lavine
When you put Simmons on the Bulls his only position is PF. Today Lavine starts at the SF with Giddey and White at guard, Patrick Williams at the 4. OK Simmons can't shoot so at best he's a defensive, passing PF with Williams moving to the SF. Even if Vucevic returns to his shooting form Giddey is maybe good not great from behind the arc so they have White who is very good and Williams who has not shot in volume for his career yet. Dosunmu could step up and Lonzo Ball off the bench may come back, how does he shoot, it's hard to remember he's been out for 2 2/3 seasons.
The Bulls aren't trying to tank to #10 because they owe a protected 1st, they are in the midst of changing the roster and they will change more next summer with or without an expiring Simmons.
no deal
yes it's great to get the expiring contract for Lavine
When you put Simmons on the Bulls his only position is PF. Today Lavine starts at the SF with Giddey and White at guard, Patrick Williams at the 4. OK Simmons can't shoot so at best he's a defensive, passing PF with Williams moving to the SF. Even if Vucevic returns to his shooting form Giddey is maybe good not great from behind the arc so they have White who is very good and Williams who has not shot in volume for his career yet. Dosunmu could step up and Lonzo Ball off the bench may come back, how does he shoot, it's hard to remember he's been out for 2 2/3 seasons.
The Bulls aren't trying to tank to #10 because they owe a protected 1st, they are in the midst of changing the roster and they will change more next summer with or without an expiring Simmons.
no deal
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,901
- And1: 1,238
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: bulls and nets
ChettheJet wrote:This could have been done for the past year and a half and didn't happen. So for the umteenth time
yes it's great to get the expiring contract for Lavine
When you put Simmons on the Bulls his only position is PF. Today Lavine starts at the SF with Giddey and White at guard, Patrick Williams at the 4. OK Simmons can't shoot so at best he's a defensive, passing PF with Williams moving to the SF. Even if Vucevic returns to his shooting form Giddey is maybe good not great from behind the arc so they have White who is very good and Williams who has not shot in volume for his career yet. Dosunmu could step up and Lonzo Ball off the bench may come back, how does he shoot, it's hard to remember he's been out for 2 2/3 seasons.
The Bulls aren't trying to tank to #10 because they owe a protected 1st, they are in the midst of changing the roster and they will change more next summer with or without an expiring Simmons.
no deal
You speak as if the Bulls had the chance to do this and didn't and you provide a long rationalization, which is crazy, because this would never happen but not because of the Bulls but the Nets, who definitely don't want to take on 2 years and 100M of another injury prone flawed player like Lavine. Bulls would take this deal so fast your head would be spinning. Pretending otherwise is dumbfounding.
Re: bulls and nets
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,056
- And1: 17,566
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: bulls and nets
Count me as another thinking that the Bulls don't have this easy of an out on LaVine.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,456
- And1: 548
- Joined: Feb 01, 2019
-
Re: bulls and nets
If we are taking Lavine's salary and a first for Simmons (expiring) why do we need to throw in a good prospect like Wilson?
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 1,574
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: bulls and nets
The 2025 free agency group is not as talented as it seemed it would be, due to extensions. Still, Brooklyn is not going to give up on their plan to have max capspace available, at least not for Zach with only 1 good 1st as sweetener.
And I don't think Lavine and Thomas make sense as a backcourt pairing.
And I don't think Lavine and Thomas make sense as a backcourt pairing.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,811
- And1: 10,485
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: bulls and nets
Awful for the Bulls, they aren't running a Call of Duty Esports team which is the only thing Simmons could really play for.
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,082
- And1: 14,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: bulls and nets
I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Senior
- Posts: 734
- And1: 251
- Joined: Jun 27, 2015
-
Re: bulls and nets
I like another Bulls trade for Simmons
Bulls trade - Ball/Vuc/Terry
Nets trade - Simmons
Nets can use a center as there starter Sharpe is both injured and not good even when healthy. Vuc is a solid center
who wont hurt the tank but can help the younger players like Claxton and Cam Thomas develop. Vuc has this year and
next at 20m, Ball is a 20m expiring contract who can help in limited minutes as he comes back, Terry is a prospect flier.
For the Bulls Simmons is a great value even if he doesnt play as a 40m expiring contract and gets the Bulls off Vuc.
IF he does play you can run something along the lines of Giddy/White/Lavine/Williams/Smith with
Ayo/Phillps/Buziles/Simmons off the bench.
Bulls trade - Ball/Vuc/Terry
Nets trade - Simmons
Nets can use a center as there starter Sharpe is both injured and not good even when healthy. Vuc is a solid center
who wont hurt the tank but can help the younger players like Claxton and Cam Thomas develop. Vuc has this year and
next at 20m, Ball is a 20m expiring contract who can help in limited minutes as he comes back, Terry is a prospect flier.
For the Bulls Simmons is a great value even if he doesnt play as a 40m expiring contract and gets the Bulls off Vuc.
IF he does play you can run something along the lines of Giddy/White/Lavine/Williams/Smith with
Ayo/Phillps/Buziles/Simmons off the bench.
Re: bulls and nets
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,775
- And1: 14,046
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: bulls and nets
cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
I think it’s a pretty easy sell. 50% of Simmons’ contract has been paid this year already (due to Simmons contract quirk hat has 50% of his salary paid by October 1), so he can tell ownership he cleared Lavine’s $138m potentially owed and they now only owe about $20.2m total. And for only one well protected first? They save $23m in cash payments alone this year. They’ll love to hear that.
I also personally think that Chicago may end up keeping their first his year regardless of this trade.
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,082
- And1: 14,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: bulls and nets
Scoot McGroot wrote:cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
I think it’s a pretty easy sell. 50% of Simmons’ contract has been paid this year already (due to Simmons contract quirk hat has 50% of his salary paid by October 1), so he can tell ownership he cleared Lavine’s $138m potentially owed and they now only owe about $20.2m total. And for only one well protected first? They save $23m in cash payments alone this year. They’ll love to hear that.
I also personally think that Chicago may end up keeping their first his year regardless of this trade.
Gotta pay somebody to get people to show up, and the Bulls haven’t exactly been a huge FA draw; so I’m not sure that ownership would throw in the towel on their play-in dreams that easily.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: bulls and nets
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,775
- And1: 14,046
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
-
Re: bulls and nets
cgf wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
I think it’s a pretty easy sell. 50% of Simmons’ contract has been paid this year already (due to Simmons contract quirk hat has 50% of his salary paid by October 1), so he can tell ownership he cleared Lavine’s $138m potentially owed and they now only owe about $20.2m total. And for only one well protected first? They save $23m in cash payments alone this year. They’ll love to hear that.
I also personally think that Chicago may end up keeping their first his year regardless of this trade.
Gotta pay somebody to get people to show up, and the Bulls haven’t exactly been a huge FA draw; so I’m not sure that ownership would throw in the towel on their play-in dreams that easily.
I disagree. As an Indy fan, I’ve seen that belief held up for guys like Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy, Malcolm Brogdon, etc, but what’s actually sold more tickets was the eventual shift to a true rebuild. Plus, how much is Lavine actually selling tickets there, nowadays? And, we’re talking about a TON of cash savings, and on a guy that’s made it clear he doesn’t want to be there. That’s going to be a LOT MORE than a game or two in the play in could make them.
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,082
- And1: 14,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: bulls and nets
Scoot McGroot wrote:cgf wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
I think it’s a pretty easy sell. 50% of Simmons’ contract has been paid this year already (due to Simmons contract quirk hat has 50% of his salary paid by October 1), so he can tell ownership he cleared Lavine’s $138m potentially owed and they now only owe about $20.2m total. And for only one well protected first? They save $23m in cash payments alone this year. They’ll love to hear that.
I also personally think that Chicago may end up keeping their first his year regardless of this trade.
Gotta pay somebody to get people to show up, and the Bulls haven’t exactly been a huge FA draw; so I’m not sure that ownership would throw in the towel on their play-in dreams that easily.
I disagree. As an Indy fan, I’ve seen that belief held up for guys like Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy, Malcolm Brogdon, etc, but what’s actually sold more tickets was the eventual shift to a true rebuild. Plus, how much is Lavine actually selling tickets there, nowadays? And, we’re talking about a TON of cash savings, and on a guy that’s made it clear he doesn’t want to be there. That’s going to be a LOT MORE than a game or two in the play in could make them.
I understand what you’re saying but the UC is just too consistently packed despite having a mediocre team for me to believe this ownership group will risk losing even a cent from those fans coming through the gates, despite the ticket prices, by admitting to tanking.
Granted I do think Lavine could have a strong bounce back year and basically replace what they lost with DDR, next to Coby & the other kids. So I don’t think they are completely delusional to think they could make the play in.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 373
- Joined: Jun 20, 2007
-
Re: bulls and nets
I'm not at all convinced that lineup is going to make a decent push for the play-in. Offensively it seems like it should make sense even if there is more than a few guys who need and/or want the ball to be effective. But wet newspaper would provide more resistance than their defense. That's gonna be rough against anyone except the other bottom teams.cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,082
- And1: 14,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: bulls and nets
schaffy wrote:I'm not at all convinced that lineup is going to make a decent push for the play-in. Offensively it seems like it should make sense even if there is more than a few guys who need and/or want the ball to be effective. But wet newspaper would provide more resistance than their defense. That's gonna be rough against anyone except the other bottom teams.cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Their rim protection is going to be poor again and losing Caruso will definitely hurt them against top teams, but they have a lot of scrappy-to-very-good defenders on the perimeter...Williams, White, Dosunmu, Terry, Lonzo?, and Duarte; with Giddey & Lavine not being liabilities...and Donavon is an excellent defensive coach.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,892
- And1: 373
- Joined: Jun 20, 2007
-
Re: bulls and nets
They had the 21st rated defense last yr and they are effectively swapping Caruso and ddr for lavine and giddey in the lineup and getting williams back more in place of roleplayers. Maybe I'm wrong but I just don't see that starting group being any better defensively than last yr.cgf wrote:schaffy wrote:I'm not at all convinced that lineup is going to make a decent push for the play-in. Offensively it seems like it should make sense even if there is more than a few guys who need and/or want the ball to be effective. But wet newspaper would provide more resistance than their defense. That's gonna be rough against anyone except the other bottom teams.cgf wrote:I don't see how AK could sell this to ownership. Who knows what'll happen with Lavine this season, but when he came back from injury last season Chicago had their most successful stretch of the season and with DDR leaving town, their offense could really use Zach next to Coby.
They won't make any noise in the postseason and will really need to scrape for that 10th seed given how strong the East's top 8 is and how solid Atlanta should be, but a White - Lavine - Giggity - Williams - Vucevic starting 5 makes sense on paper; and with Ayo, Terry, Duarte, Buzelis, Smith, etc. there's some talent on the bench even if Lonzo breaks again.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Their rim protection is going to be poor again and losing Caruso will definitely hurt them against top teams, but they have a lot of scrappy-to-very-good defenders on the perimeter...Williams, White, Dosunmu, Terry, Lonzo?, and Duarte; with Giddey & Lavine not being liabilities...and Donavon is an excellent defensive coach.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,082
- And1: 14,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: bulls and nets
schaffy wrote:They had the 21st rated defense last yr and they are effectively swapping Caruso and ddr for lavine and giddey in the lineup and getting williams back more in place of roleplayers. Maybe I'm wrong but I just don't see that starting group being any better defensively than last yr.cgf wrote:schaffy wrote:I'm not at all convinced that lineup is going to make a decent push for the play-in. Offensively it seems like it should make sense even if there is more than a few guys who need and/or want the ball to be effective. But wet newspaper would provide more resistance than their defense. That's gonna be rough against anyone except the other bottom teams.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Their rim protection is going to be poor again and losing Caruso will definitely hurt them against top teams, but they have a lot of scrappy-to-very-good defenders on the perimeter...Williams, White, Dosunmu, Terry, Lonzo?, and Duarte; with Giddey & Lavine not being liabilities...and Donavon is an excellent defensive coach.
Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
Caruso to PWill is a downgrade for sure, but a) Lavine & Giddey will be better than DeRozan, and b) they had a lot of young players who should continue improving defensively.
Duarte, Lonzo, and their rookie also weren’t part of the equation last year…though I dunno how many of them will make a positive impact this year.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: bulls and nets
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 825
- And1: 571
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: bulls and nets
wemby wrote:ChettheJet wrote:This could have been done for the past year and a half and didn't happen. So for the umteenth time
yes it's great to get the expiring contract for Lavine
When you put Simmons on the Bulls his only position is PF. Today Lavine starts at the SF with Giddey and White at guard, Patrick Williams at the 4. OK Simmons can't shoot so at best he's a defensive, passing PF with Williams moving to the SF. Even if Vucevic returns to his shooting form Giddey is maybe good not great from behind the arc so they have White who is very good and Williams who has not shot in volume for his career yet. Dosunmu could step up and Lonzo Ball off the bench may come back, how does he shoot, it's hard to remember he's been out for 2 2/3 seasons.
The Bulls aren't trying to tank to #10 because they owe a protected 1st, they are in the midst of changing the roster and they will change more next summer with or without an expiring Simmons.
no deal
You speak as if the Bulls had the chance to do this and didn't and you provide a long rationalization, which is crazy, because this would never happen but not because of the Bulls but the Nets, who definitely don't want to take on 2 years and 100M of another injury prone flawed player like Lavine. Bulls would take this deal so fast your head would be spinning. Pretending otherwise is dumbfounding.
100% correct. The Bulls would realistically take this offer in a split second.
Re: bulls and nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,220
- And1: 5,763
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
-
Re: bulls and nets
The Nets aren't doing this, it's tank season for them and they want to retain their cap flexibility going forward. They'll happily let Ben expire than take on Lavine
Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my Pixel 9 Pro XL using RealGM mobile app
Return to Trades and Transactions