ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Clinton or Bush?

Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36

President?

Harris
8
29%
Trump
6
21%
RFK
3
11%
The Rock
1
4%
Mark Cuban
0
No votes
David Guetta Ft. Mark Ronson
0
No votes
Michelle Obama
4
14%
Ron Desantis
1
4%
Rik Smits
5
18%
 
Total votes: 28

User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,532
And1: 27,252
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: What is your juiciest political opinion? Spill! 

Post#1321 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:24 pm

Pointgod wrote:Just a normal President

Read on Twitter


Meanwhile he has the support of radical right lunatics with guns and organizations like KKK and other militia like groups. People don't find this a problem though. It's the Haitians eating the pets and the illegal border crossers that need to rounded up and removed. The people who aren't loyal to Trump have already been added to the list. Muslims. Where does it end?

The dude is insane. The people who want to minimize his lunacy don't get it either. He'll never be able to do these things because XYZ.... He's been working to circumvent everything to regain power. Power he wouldn't relinquish last time he had it. It's enough to be concerned about.

All we can do is hold on to hope. Hope that enough people with vote for Kamala to win. Then hope that Trump didn't undermine the count enough to steal the election. Period. I live about 400ft away from where I'm casting my vote. That's the only thing any of us can do. Vote.
:beer: RIP mags
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,219
And1: 24,526
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: 2nd Trump assassination attempt 

Post#1322 » by Pointgod » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:24 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:I have zero problem winning over the more sane Republicans. But putting one in the cabinet is **** pathetic


I did not read that as cabinet, but as council positions which is different.


Read on Twitter
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: 2nd Trump assassination attempt 

Post#1323 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:25 pm

rajajackal wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
That’s not the point. The point is that following the Hillary Clinton triangulation to the right game plan - that has proven to be a failure in the past - is not the way to build enthusiasm and momentum in a presidential campaign.

Harris is playing “not to lose” and in doing so is alienating her base and dampening the enthusiasm we had for her in the beginning.


My enthusiasm isn't dampening at all when the alternative is the convicted felon who literally sh*ts himself in public while threatening to have non whites rounded up en masse. I don't know how loud Trump has to keep signaling what he's going to do for people to realize that this is a matter of life or death for millions of Americans.

When someone is telling you who they are, believe them.

Like i understand not wanting anything to do with -any- Republican after what they all collectively brought our country towards, including the Never Trumpers, but this is deadly serious and this is no longer about party lines. It's either Harris and sane, rational government under democratic rule or Trump, Project 2025 and fascism.

I don't have much choice in this matter. In fact, as a person of color, i honestly don't have a choice at all. I have to vote for Harris. That's it. I do not have the luxury or privilege to feel "alienated" by Harris rallying support from conservatives who reject Trump and MAGA.

When i see people expressing these feelings, which they have every right to, i feel like a lot of folks are quietly okay with Harris losing if things she does aren't perfect and to their 100% liking, and that scares me to death about next month.

i just gotta say, trump said a lot of crazy **** before 2016 and people acted like we needed to vote for hillary lest he implement a fascist regime and never leave office. turned out to be a relatively normal presidency except for the headlines, tweets, quotes, etc. that's not to say we shouldn't still vote against him, but i really don't buy into the fear mongering about the future of democracy when the democrats finessed a nominee that literally was not voted for. trump may be a lunatic with a loaded gun but his supporters genuinely voted for him despite his party preferring the likes of jeb, christie, cruz, etc. meanwhile bernie was actively thwarted by the democrats twice lol the real threat to democracy is letting the democrats get away with making voter will incrementally obsolete over the last 12 years imo


Not sure how you can call it a normal presidency. First days in the white house airports were shut down because of a clumsily invoked Muslim ban.

He shut down the government multiple times over things like funding his border wall which he had promised Mexico would pay for.

He gutted the State Dept worldwide until it was a skeletal organization that lost thousands of seasoned non-partisan professionals.

He gutted the EPA and removed many of the protections that keep us save from industrial waste in our water and our air.

He was impeached two times, once for blackmailing Ukraine with the threat to pull funding if they did not manufacture false evidence against his opponent Biden, the other time for incitement of insurrection.

He's a rapist.

He's a convicted felon for business fraud.

He stole state secrets and lied about it when asked to return government property.

He tried to steal an election.

He was hold Trump telethons during covid gasbagging about himself while he was sending needed medical supplies to China and Russian and failing to mount an effective plan for the pandemic.

He publicly applauded dictators while undermining our allies and NATO.

He repeatedly insulted military and veterans calling them suckers and losers.

He failed to pass any meaningful legislation even with both houses under his control other than tax cuts for the wealthy.

And that's just a sample, because this list could go on for pages.

And you call that normal?
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: 2nd Trump assassination attempt 

Post#1324 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:28 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
rajajackal wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
My enthusiasm isn't dampening at all when the alternative is the convicted felon who literally sh*ts himself in public while threatening to have non whites rounded up en masse. I don't know how loud Trump has to keep signaling what he's going to do for people to realize that this is a matter of life or death for millions of Americans.

When someone is telling you who they are, believe them.

Like i understand not wanting anything to do with -any- Republican after what they all collectively brought our country towards, including the Never Trumpers, but this is deadly serious and this is no longer about party lines. It's either Harris and sane, rational government under democratic rule or Trump, Project 2025 and fascism.

I don't have much choice in this matter. In fact, as a person of color, i honestly don't have a choice at all. I have to vote for Harris. That's it. I do not have the luxury or privilege to feel "alienated" by Harris rallying support from conservatives who reject Trump and MAGA.

When i see people expressing these feelings, which they have every right to, i feel like a lot of folks are quietly okay with Harris losing if things she does aren't perfect and to their 100% liking, and that scares me to death about next month.

i just gotta say, trump said a lot of crazy **** before 2016 and people acted like we needed to vote for hillary lest he implement a fascist regime and never leave office. turned out to be a relatively normal presidency except for the headlines, tweets, quotes, etc. that's not to say we shouldn't still vote against him, but i really don't buy into the fear mongering about the future of democracy when the democrats finessed a nominee that literally was not voted for. trump may be a lunatic with a loaded gun but his supporters genuinely voted for him despite his party preferring the likes of jeb, christie, cruz, etc. meanwhile bernie was actively thwarted by the democrats twice lol the real threat to democracy is letting the democrats get away with making voter will incrementally obsolete over the last 12 years imo


Your definition of normal is way different from mine.

Trump instituted a racist Muslim ban on Day 1.

He separated families at the border, throwing kids in cages. There were multiple deaths and reports of women being sterilized.

Trump literally fired the FBI director because he wouldn't pledge loyalty to HIM. Not the country
Him.

Trump appointed 3 SCOTUS justices, one of whom is an alleged rapist, and they overturned Roe v Wade. Women have died because of this.

Trump used his office to enrich himself by having taxpayers pay for the Secret Service to stay at his properties.

Trump tried to stage a violent coup on January 6th and conspired with several people, some of whom have been indicted on federal and state charges, for election fraud. He tried to get Mike Pence, his own VP, killed because he refused to betray the country.

I can go on for much, much longer but the point is there was absolutely nothing about Trump’s presidency that was normal and to say so is highly revisionist.

He threatened a Muslim ban in 2016 and did it as soon as he was inaugurated. You think this stuff about rounding up people is a joke?

Nah. You must have nothing to lose fam. I do.


Word.

I didn't even see your response before I posted mine.

We had the same first line. Great minds ...
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: 2nd Trump assassination attempt 

Post#1325 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:37 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:I have zero problem winning over the more sane Republicans. But putting one in the cabinet is **** pathetic


I did not read that as cabinet, but as council positions which is different.


Read on Twitter


Right, not cabinet positions.

An important distinction.

Trump's cabinet was full of grifters like Betsy DeVos and Wilbur Ross
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,532
And1: 27,252
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: 2nd Trump assassination attempt 

Post#1326 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 13, 2024 4:38 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I did not read that as cabinet, but as council positions which is different.


Read on Twitter


Right, not cabinet positions.

An important distinction.

Trump's cabinet was full of grifters like Betsy DeVos and Wilbur Ross


He overflowed the swamp with fecal matter!
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,532
And1: 27,252
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1327 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 13, 2024 6:10 pm

For some reason the thread title changed to any PFs who could complete our bench? WTF?
:beer: RIP mags
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,792
And1: 1,852
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1328 » by JayTWill » Sun Oct 13, 2024 6:17 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:For some reason the thread title changed to any PFs who could complete our bench? WTF?


I have been avoiding this thread the entire time and I was completely thrown off by the first response lol
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1329 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:02 pm

A mod messed up and merged this thread with that other thread.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,219
And1: 24,526
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1330 » by Pointgod » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:28 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:For some reason the thread title changed to any PFs who could complete our bench? WTF?


You guys should sign Robert Covington to add some bench depth.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,219
And1: 24,526
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1331 » by Pointgod » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:35 pm

Seriously what the hell is wrong with your country?

Read on Twitter
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1332 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:35 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:For some reason the thread title changed to any PFs who could complete our bench? WTF?


You guys should sign Robert Covington to add some bench depth.


Can he shoot?

Asking for the Secret Service
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1333 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:36 pm

Pointgod wrote:Seriously what the hell is wrong with your country?

Read on Twitter


The ages show the progression of historical illiteracy as it worsens
Hatrick Ewing
Pro Prospect
Posts: 782
And1: 694
Joined: Nov 24, 2021

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1334 » by Hatrick Ewing » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:46 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:For some reason the thread title changed to any PFs who could complete our bench? WTF?


You guys should sign Robert Covington to add some bench depth.



Hasn't he been washed for a few years though? Or maybe has something left? He was very well thought of for a period there.
Hatrick Ewing
Pro Prospect
Posts: 782
And1: 694
Joined: Nov 24, 2021

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1335 » by Hatrick Ewing » Sun Oct 13, 2024 8:47 pm

I still find it hard to believe that the Knicks couldn't have picked off a center from terrible teams like the hornets or pistons who have multiple centers. Maybe they just thought those guys wouldn't cut it. What a find hartenstein was
User avatar
Kampuchea
RealGM
Posts: 11,353
And1: 9,301
Joined: Oct 20, 2010
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
       

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1336 » by Kampuchea » Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:18 pm

Typical, bringing politics into the basketball threads
Image
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,798
And1: 54,734
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1337 » by MrDollarBills » Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:36 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:Seriously what the hell is wrong with your country?

Read on Twitter


The ages show the progression of historical illiteracy as it worsens


Lots of children left behind. I wonder why?

Reading about Hitler's atrocities was required summer reading when I entered high school. Can't say I'm surprised at this.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas /T. Bryant
PF: K. Kuzma /J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan /J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr. /V. Williams Jr.
PG: C. Payne /G.Vincent
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1338 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:40 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:Seriously what the hell is wrong with your country?

Read on Twitter


The ages show the progression of historical illiteracy as it worsens


Lots of children left behind. I wonder why?

Reading about Hitler's atrocities was required summer reading when I entered high school. Can't say I'm surprised at this.


I read about WWII as a child. Met William Shirer. Watched documentaries. Had neighbors with camp numbers tattooed on their wrists. Saw the photos of mass graves full of rotting bodies.

Kids are raised by video games now
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,640
And1: 61,664
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1339 » by DOT » Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:44 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:Seriously what the hell is wrong with your country?

Read on Twitter


The ages show the progression of historical illiteracy as it worsens


Lots of children left behind. I wonder why?

Reading about Hitler's atrocities was required summer reading when I entered high school. Can't say I'm surprised at this.

I think my favorite one of these was one of the chuds on the CA board was posting about one of these polls seeing who agreed with Nazis which showed both Dems and Republicans were about equal and absolutely screeching about how it proved Horseshoe Theory, but then I actually opened the study and it turns out that while that was true, the group of people who were by far the most likely to say the Nazis had some good points were people who identified as "Moderate"

Essentially what this is is the effect of the right wing rabbit hole on terminally online young men combined with the increase in contrarianism. Meaning people love to play Devil's advocate. "Hitler was wrong on a lot of things, but he had some good ideas on the economy" was a joke I used to hear in high school 15 or so years ago. I would assume a non-insignificant number of people saying so have been conditioned to give everyone the benefit of the doubt more so than they should. They would not know what exactly said "good ideas" would be, they would just assume there had to be some because they're contrarian for the sake of being contrarian or some such nonsense.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Any PFs who could complete our bench? 

Post#1340 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:47 pm

DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
The ages show the progression of historical illiteracy as it worsens


Lots of children left behind. I wonder why?

Reading about Hitler's atrocities was required summer reading when I entered high school. Can't say I'm surprised at this.

I think my favorite one of these was one of the chuds on the CA board was posting about one of these polls seeing who agreed with Nazis which showed both Dems and Republicans were about equal and absolutely screeching about how it proved Horseshoe Theory, but then I actually opened the study and it turns out that while that was true, the group of people who were by far the most likely to say the Nazis had some good points were people who identified as "Moderate"

Essentially what this is is the effect of the right wing rabbit hole on terminally online young men combined with the increase in contrarianism. Meaning people love to play Devil's advocate. "Hitler was wrong on a lot of things, but he had some good ideas on the economy" was a joke I used to hear in high school 15 or so years ago. I would assume a non-insignificant number of people saying so have been conditioned to give everyone the benefit of the doubt more so than they should. They would not know what exactly said "good ideas" would be, they would just assume there had to be some because they're contrarian for the sake of being contrarian or some such nonsense.


Yes, that would have been understood to be a joke by a person with basic literacy 15 years ago, but now it would be taken without irony as a legit talking point. The collapse of our culture has been swift.

Return to New York Knicks