ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston??

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,650
And1: 67,068
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#161 » by Guano » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:41 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g


Looks the same.



His shot is definitely wonky right now and the form has changed, even his guide hand (left) looks off after he releases it. His set point right now is nearly behind his head, it's like he watched Jokic and said to himself "well he doesn't get blocked, let me try a lil of that".


Set point


Image




The Nova form is much better, the V angle formed between his shoulder and wrist is basically ideal, all he needed to do was load his wrist more to get his hand under the ball


Image



Whoever changed his shot to what we saw last night should be fired


:lol:
Fck his form his body angle is weird as hell. What the hell is he doing. Looks fcking goofy.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,650
And1: 67,068
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#162 » by Guano » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:43 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter


ericfromqueens isnt wrong
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
HighRyzer83
RealGM
Posts: 12,168
And1: 5,166
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Fan on Fire

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#163 » by HighRyzer83 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:43 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Burn it down

Time to rebuild

Trade Brunson for 8 FRPs while his value is highest


Image


I don’t see how you can’t be legit concerned about Bridges!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He’s 2-19 from three in preseason and everybody sees he’s changed his shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its legit concerning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


He is a tinkerer. KAT is also like not shooting well yet. I am not worried. If he needs to he will change it back. He may start slow out of the gates but quite doubtful he remains bad for too long.

If he could change it back so easily why didn't he already? It's been months since the trade. You'd figure he'd fix that as soon as it appears not months
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,650
And1: 67,068
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#164 » by Guano » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:44 pm

This sht looks like a soccer throw in.
Image
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#165 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:47 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
No! Moar bad takes!!!! Everyone has to draw their lines in the sand NOW! :D


Burn it down

Time to rebuild

Trade Brunson for 8 FRPs while his value is highest


Image


I don’t see how you can’t be legit concerned about Bridges!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He’s 2-19 from three in preseason and everybody sees he’s changed his shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its legit concerning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Whomever is charged with the task of changing your diapers must be completely burnt out by now
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,846
And1: 137,955
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#166 » by god shammgod » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:50 pm

Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
Looks the same.



His shot is definitely wonky right now and the form has changed, even his guide hand (left) looks off after he releases it. His set point right now is nearly behind his head, it's like he watched Jokic and said to himself "well he doesn't get blocked, let me try a lil of that".


Set point


Image




The Nova form is much better, the V angle formed between his shoulder and wrist is basically ideal, all he needed to do was load his wrist more to get his hand under the ball


Image




Whoever changed his shot to what we saw last night should be fired


:lol:
Fck his form his body angle is weird as hell. What the hell is he doing. Looks fcking goofy.


Image
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 43,444
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#167 » by TheGreenArrow » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:56 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

His shot is definitely wonky right now and the form has changed, even his guide hand (left) looks off after he releases it. His set point right now is nearly behind his head, it's like he watched Jokic and said to himself "well he doesn't get blocked, let me try a lil of that".


Set point


Image




The Nova form is much better, the V angle formed between his shoulder and wrist is basically ideal, all he needed to do was load his wrist more to get his hand under the ball


Image




Whoever changed his shot to what we saw last night should be fired


:lol:
Fck his form his body angle is weird as hell. What the hell is he doing. Looks fcking goofy.


Image


Yoooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:rofl: :rofl:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#168 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:57 pm

I believe that Josh Hart will set a new NBA record by playing in all 82 games and not take 1 shot.
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,650
And1: 67,068
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#169 » by Guano » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:58 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

His shot is definitely wonky right now and the form has changed, even his guide hand (left) looks off after he releases it. His set point right now is nearly behind his head, it's like he watched Jokic and said to himself "well he doesn't get blocked, let me try a lil of that".


Set point


Image




The Nova form is much better, the V angle formed between his shoulder and wrist is basically ideal, all he needed to do was load his wrist more to get his hand under the ball


Image




Whoever changed his shot to what we saw last night should be fired


:lol:
Fck his form his body angle is weird as hell. What the hell is he doing. Looks fcking goofy.


Image


:lol:
You found mikals new shooting coach.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,505
And1: 28,340
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#170 » by Iron Mantis » Sat Oct 19, 2024 8:05 pm

Fat wrote:Turning on mikal bridges after preseason let’s get it Image



Image

That beat still slaps
Image
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,505
And1: 28,340
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#171 » by Iron Mantis » Sat Oct 19, 2024 8:20 pm

F N 11 wrote:Without chemistry and max minutes :lol:


Every play on offense, there's no center to meet Brunson at the rim and when he tries to help, Brunson makes the pass to KAT for an easy bucket :lol: Brunson is out there doing whatever he wants....

Brunson will avg 32ppg this year on 63 TS% 8-)
Image
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,335
And1: 68,094
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#172 » by F N 11 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:06 pm

In real Knicks news. Lonnie walker?

Read on Twitter
?s=46
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,222
And1: 7,427
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#173 » by prophet_of_rage » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:08 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Why Change this????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Smh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The distance from 19 to 23 feet?

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,335
And1: 68,094
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#174 » by F N 11 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:14 pm

Max Strus got hurt. Race for Lonnie Walker if even possible.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,222
And1: 7,427
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#175 » by prophet_of_rage » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:14 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Man said he's been trying to fix a hitch for the past 7 years. That's not gonna get fixed in the season.


The main reason to trade randle was because mikal was supposed to be that 3rd/2nd option!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The way he’s looking he may be 5th option behind deuce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We traded the wrong nova boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Should’ve traded jhart tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If they really wanted a scoring wing that can replicate Randle’s gravity, Ingram was literally right there available all summer. Knicks folded.

Read on Twitter
I wanted BI. But everybody loves the 3 that Bridges can't shoot right now. That isn't the problem, though. The problem.is the lack of variety in attack. OG and Mikal are just chucking. Towns is chucking.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
Parraknick
Starter
Posts: 2,229
And1: 1,107
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Location: Sydney

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#176 » by Parraknick » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:23 pm

F N 11 wrote:Max Strus got hurt. Race for Lonnie Walker if even possible.


Lonnie could be a good pick up
Image
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,125
And1: 6,264
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#177 » by whocares1 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:27 pm

prophet_of_rage wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
The main reason to trade randle was because mikal was supposed to be that 3rd/2nd option!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The way he’s looking he may be 5th option behind deuce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We traded the wrong nova boy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Should’ve traded jhart tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If they really wanted a scoring wing that can replicate Randle’s gravity, Ingram was literally right there available all summer. Knicks folded.

Read on Twitter
I wanted BI. But everybody loves the 3 that Bridges can't shoot right now. That isn't the problem, though. The problem.is the lack of variety in attack. OG and Mikal are just chucking. Towns is chucking.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app



It wasn’t about just shooting the three. Obviously a factor was the fact that Mikal and Brunson are close, but the idea was finding a player that can fit in a team offense that can space the floor and move without the ball. Also a player that can play defensively and do the dirty work. Things that Ingram does not excel at.
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,222
And1: 7,427
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#178 » by prophet_of_rage » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:37 pm

whocares1 wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:If they really wanted a scoring wing that can replicate Randle’s gravity, Ingram was literally right there available all summer. Knicks folded.

Read on Twitter
I wanted BI. But everybody loves the 3 that Bridges can't shoot right now. That isn't the problem, though. The problem.is the lack of variety in attack. OG and Mikal are just chucking. Towns is chucking.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app



It wasn’t about just shooting the three. Obviously a factor was the fact that Mikal and Brunson are close, but the idea was finding a player that can fit in a team offense that can space the floor and move without the ball. Also a player that can play defensively and do the dirty work. Things that Ingram does not excel at.
BI would give you the scoring forward that nobody would.leave. OG stretches the floor with the 3 and he and Josh defend wings as necessary.

Also with Randle and BI your playmakinh is sick and JB can pick his spots. You can never have enough tough shot makers and playmakers in yout offence. The biggest misconception of 5 out is that you need 3 point shooters. You.need players that people.can't turn their head on.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,125
And1: 6,264
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#179 » by whocares1 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:58 pm

prophet_of_rage wrote:
whocares1 wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:I wanted BI. But everybody loves the 3 that Bridges can't shoot right now. That isn't the problem, though. The problem.is the lack of variety in attack. OG and Mikal are just chucking. Towns is chucking.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app



It wasn’t about just shooting the three. Obviously a factor was the fact that Mikal and Brunson are close, but the idea was finding a player that can fit in a team offense that can space the floor and move without the ball. Also a player that can play defensively and do the dirty work. Things that Ingram does not excel at.
BI would give you the scoring forward that nobody would.leave. OG stretches the floor with the 3 and he and Josh defend wings as necessary.

Also with Randle and BI your playmakinh is sick and JB can pick his spots. You can never have enough tough shot makers and playmakers in yout offence. The biggest misconception of 5 out is that you need 3 point shooters. You.need players that people.can't turn their head on.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


So BI, Randle and Brunson? Yea no lol. If you think that’d work then there’s nothing left to say.
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,222
And1: 7,427
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG: KNICKS vs Wizards - Are We Ready For Boston?? 

Post#180 » by prophet_of_rage » Sat Oct 19, 2024 10:05 pm

whocares1 wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
whocares1 wrote:

It wasn’t about just shooting the three. Obviously a factor was the fact that Mikal and Brunson are close, but the idea was finding a player that can fit in a team offense that can space the floor and move without the ball. Also a player that can play defensively and do the dirty work. Things that Ingram does not excel at.
BI would give you the scoring forward that nobody would.leave. OG stretches the floor with the 3 and he and Josh defend wings as necessary.

Also with Randle and BI your playmakinh is sick and JB can pick his spots. You can never have enough tough shot makers and playmakers in yout offence. The biggest misconception of 5 out is that you need 3 point shooters. You.need players that people.can't turn their head on.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


So BI, Randle and Brunson? Yea no lol. If you think that’d work then there’s nothing left to say.
Lack of ability to reply? Are you leaving BI to double Randle or Brunson? For it not to work you have to leave one of them open and clog the paint. All three shoot the midrange too well.to make that a thing and Randle and BI can cut off Brunson. You also have real post up threats.

This is stand outside and shoot 3s. Why would.Inguard any of it until.you provw.you.can make several.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Return to New York Knicks