lilfishi22 wrote:Frank Lee wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:From Reddit
………….rather than relying solely on the Big 3, I feel far less dependant on needing all 3 of our Big 3 having good to solid games to be in games unlike last season.
Do we really have a ‘big three’? Its purely a marketing term. IMO… and a bad one at that
Beal might be the fifth best player on this team…
He is ‘big’ in contract only and truly not going to be relied upon to win games. The dude is a solid role player and the proverbial stat stuffer on/from a bad team.
Here is an exercise… remove one starter for half the season or more…. Who you picking?
And thank the BBallgods they dropped the Shank
Don't really care what other people want to call it. For the sake of grouping the 3 most important guys to our success together (imo), I just call them the Big 3. You are right though, I do feel less dependent on all 3 guys having good games to be in games like last season, however in my view, the ceiling of this team is still determined by how well these three play and play together. Beal's ceiling is still the 3rd highest on this team so I disagree with you that he's the 5th best player. I mean, if it's all working, who is better and have more experience to perform than Beal? That's not to say Beal is several tiers better than say Grayson or Jones like Book/KD are, but I do put him solidly above everyone else.
I think because he makes so much people discount his talents, and particularly talk about it after a bad game. But the guy has led the league in scoring, been a key part of some good Washington playoff teams, etc. People say good guy on bad team, but I don't know that they were worse than the Suns before we got Paul in addition to Book.
He has always put up similar #s to Book, won a scoring title, and last year had elite splits on over 18ppg. The problem is that he plays the same position as Book, and all 3 of them are primarily scorers who handle some as well.
But yeah, he's obviously better than Nurkic, Allen, O'Neale, etc. I love Jones but Beal is obviously a much better all around player.
I do agree if you take 1 player out of the starting lineup it would be him, though not because he is worse than other starters, but because we need more balance and maybe a go to guy off the bench.
But again, I don't know why so many are concerned about who starts, when we stagger, etc. It's not like hockey where a whole new lineup subs in. Maybe it's almost all bench guys for like the last and first minute of the 1st/2nd and 3rd/4th quarters, but even then, usually one of the main guys is in there.



















