chonestown wrote:JayMKE wrote:you trade everybody else before Giannis, simple as that
Jimmy Butler for Dame Lillard, who says no
The Bucks.
Big drop-off between Rollins and Lillard.imo
Giannis is our PG. We got this.
(there, I did a ‘Chones’)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

                   
                   
                                                                      chonestown wrote:JayMKE wrote:you trade everybody else before Giannis, simple as that
Jimmy Butler for Dame Lillard, who says no
The Bucks.
Big drop-off between Rollins and Lillard.imo
                   
                                                                         
               CannondaleF400 wrote:Giannis turns 30 in December. The Thunder traded Russell Westbrook at age 30 and he had two really good years after that then fell off. I really hope Giannis can improve his outside game in the next couple years because I fear a Westbrook trajectory with too much reliance on athleticism. It would be really sad to see Giannis move to a different team and I hope he can age gracefully and stay with the Bucks.
                   
                   
                                                       
               DingleJerry wrote:CannondaleF400 wrote:Giannis turns 30 in December. The Thunder traded Russell Westbrook at age 30 and he had two really good years after that then fell off. I really hope Giannis can improve his outside game in the next couple years because I fear a Westbrook trajectory with too much reliance on athleticism. It would be really sad to see Giannis move to a different team and I hope he can age gracefully and stay with the Bucks.
He needs to embrace being a big, not a wing. The loss of athleticism is minimized that way. In addition, probably easier to build an offense around him that way. While also increasing the athleticism on the floor since another big can go off.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
                   
                   
                                                       
               James1980 wrote:GoldenAntlers wrote:I don't see it with Prince. Trent...not a lot going on there. Wright who? What rookies? Young guys? Never heard of 'em.
Are we really blaming our 3 minimum deal signings?
                   
                   
                                                                      Matches Malone wrote:DingleJerry wrote:CannondaleF400 wrote:Giannis turns 30 in December. The Thunder traded Russell Westbrook at age 30 and he had two really good years after that then fell off. I really hope Giannis can improve his outside game in the next couple years because I fear a Westbrook trajectory with too much reliance on athleticism. It would be really sad to see Giannis move to a different team and I hope he can age gracefully and stay with the Bucks.
He needs to embrace being a big, not a wing. The loss of athleticism is minimized that way. In addition, probably easier to build an offense around him that way. While also increasing the athleticism on the floor since another big can go off.
He wants to refuse playing center, but it's his future. Especially with smaller lineups throughout the league, he's a natural fit to eventually move there.
                   
                   
                                                                      
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               JayMKE wrote:chonestown wrote:JayMKE wrote:you trade everybody else before Giannis, simple as that
Jimmy Butler for Dame Lillard, who says no
The Bucks.
Big drop-off between Rollins and Lillard.imo
Defensively? Doubt. We'd just need a guy to be able to move the ball, defend, and hit 3s doesn't matter who. Would have another guy to put on the Jays.
paulpressey25 wrote:chonestown wrote:JayMKE wrote:you trade everybody else before Giannis, simple as that
Jimmy Butler for Dame Lillard, who says no
The Bucks.
Big drop-off between Rollins and Lillard.imo
Giannis is our PG. We got this.
(there, I did a ‘Chones’)


                   
                   
                                                                      chonestown wrote:JayMKE wrote:chonestown wrote:
The Bucks.
Big drop-off between Rollins and Lillard.imo
Defensively? Doubt. We'd just need a guy to be able to move the ball, defend, and hit 3s doesn't matter who. Would have another guy to put on the Jays.
That who is nowhere evident on the roster and I'm spectacle Horts can find that person mid-season.
Dollar for Buckets might be an interesting convo if the Bucks had, I dunno, a Tyus Jones or whatever ready to sop up minutes.
You make a good point on the gap defensively between Dame and Rolly. I hath been bested.
                   
                   
                                     
                   
               emunney wrote:Is it ok to say that if the Bucks had beaten the Celtics at home with the Celtics on the second half of a b2b, the Cs schedule would be central to all discussion of the game?

Ron Swanson wrote:We're currently a -12.6 net-rating team with Giannis on the court and a +14.8 when he's off the court. It almost defies logic lol.
                   
                   
                                                       
               Ron Swanson wrote:We're currently a -12.6 net-rating team with Giannis on the court and a +14.8 when he's off the court. It almost defies logic lol.
