I noticed that ChatGPT started allowing web searches this week, so I thought I'd post a few here. Feel free to jump in. No offense is intended by any answers provided. If you don't have access to this feature, post questions and I run them through. Also, perplexity.ai works as well.
Q1: which user is the most insightful regarding the chicago bulls?
A1: Identifying the single most insightful user on the RealGM Chicago Bulls forum is subjective, as many members contribute valuable perspectives. However, several users are frequently recognized for their in-depth analyses and consistent engagement:
DuckIII: Known for comprehensive breakdowns of team strategies and player performances.
fleet: Offers detailed insights into coaching decisions and game tactics.
coldfish: Provides statistical analyses and thoughtful evaluations of team dynamics.
transplant: Shares historical context and nuanced views on the team's development.
These contributors are highly regarded within the community for their expertise and thoughtful commentary.
OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Moderators: HomoSapien, RedBulls23, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson
OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,596
- And1: 9,283
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,596
- And1: 9,283
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Q2: how would you assess the forum's views on Sco's posts?
A2: Based on the RealGM Chicago Bulls forum, user "sco" is a highly active and respected contributor. With over 24,000 posts and more than 8,000 "And1" acknowledgments, sco's insights are well-regarded by fellow members. For instance, in a discussion about the Bulls' training camp, sco provided detailed observations on player performances, which were met with appreciation from the community.
REALGM. This level of engagement and positive feedback indicates that sco's contributions are valued and considered insightful by forum participants.
A2: Based on the RealGM Chicago Bulls forum, user "sco" is a highly active and respected contributor. With over 24,000 posts and more than 8,000 "And1" acknowledgments, sco's insights are well-regarded by fellow members. For instance, in a discussion about the Bulls' training camp, sco provided detailed observations on player performances, which were met with appreciation from the community.
REALGM. This level of engagement and positive feedback indicates that sco's contributions are valued and considered insightful by forum participants.

Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,596
- And1: 9,283
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Q3: rank the top 10 users in terms of who you think has the funniest posts?
A3: Determining the top 10 funniest users on the RealGM Chicago Bulls forum is subjective and varies based on individual preferences. However, several members are frequently recognized for their humor and wit:
DuckIII: Known for blending insightful analysis with sharp humor, DuckIII often lightens discussions with clever remarks.
fleet: Offers humorous takes on team dynamics and game outcomes, adding levity to intense debates.
coldfish: Balances statistical analysis with witty commentary, making complex topics more engaging.
transplant: Provides historical context with a humorous twist, connecting past and present Bulls narratives.
sco: Combines detailed observations with lighthearted humor, making discussions both informative and entertaining.
HomoSapien: Infuses threads with sarcasm and playful banter, keeping conversations lively.
Red Larrivee: Known for quick-witted responses and humorous takes on team news and rumors.
Shill: Adds humor through creative analogies and metaphors, offering unique perspectives on team performance.
MrSparkle: Engages in playful debates and uses humor to diffuse tense discussions.
GimmeDat: Known for humorous memes and lighthearted posts that bring a fun element to the forum.
These users contribute to the forum's vibrant atmosphere by adding humor to discussions about the Chicago Bulls.
I'll stop there. I need to tell my kids that AI thinks I am relatively funny!
A3: Determining the top 10 funniest users on the RealGM Chicago Bulls forum is subjective and varies based on individual preferences. However, several members are frequently recognized for their humor and wit:
DuckIII: Known for blending insightful analysis with sharp humor, DuckIII often lightens discussions with clever remarks.
fleet: Offers humorous takes on team dynamics and game outcomes, adding levity to intense debates.
coldfish: Balances statistical analysis with witty commentary, making complex topics more engaging.
transplant: Provides historical context with a humorous twist, connecting past and present Bulls narratives.
sco: Combines detailed observations with lighthearted humor, making discussions both informative and entertaining.
HomoSapien: Infuses threads with sarcasm and playful banter, keeping conversations lively.
Red Larrivee: Known for quick-witted responses and humorous takes on team news and rumors.
Shill: Adds humor through creative analogies and metaphors, offering unique perspectives on team performance.
MrSparkle: Engages in playful debates and uses humor to diffuse tense discussions.
GimmeDat: Known for humorous memes and lighthearted posts that bring a fun element to the forum.
These users contribute to the forum's vibrant atmosphere by adding humor to discussions about the Chicago Bulls.
I'll stop there. I need to tell my kids that AI thinks I am relatively funny!

Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
- DuckIII
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 71,946
- And1: 37,384
- Joined: Nov 25, 2003
- Location: On my high horse.
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
No dougthonus references proves AI is already self-aware and attempting to manipulate mankind away from the truth.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
League Circles
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,695
- And1: 10,126
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Lol this is funny. Ask it if I am better during my "League Circles" era or under one of my previous usernames, and what those usernames are. I'm curious if it's smart enough to figure out what those were.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,596
- And1: 9,283
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
League Circles wrote:Lol this is funny. Ask it if I am better during my "League Circles" era or under one of my previous usernames, and what those usernames are. I'm curious if it's smart enough to figure out what those were.
very AI:
Based on the search results provided, I don't have any specific information about prior usernames for a user called "League Circles". The search results don't contain any relevant information about this particular user or their previous names.
However, I can provide some general context about username changes in League of Legends based on the information available:
League of Legends has traditionally used a system of Summoner Names, which players could change for a fee2.
Riot Games is transitioning from Summoner Names to a new Riot ID system across all their games, including League of Legends1
.
Under the new Riot ID system, players will have a base name followed by a tag. The base name is not unique, but the combination of name and tag is unique1
.
With the new system, players may be able to change their Riot ID more frequently (potentially every 30 days) compared to the old Summoner Name system1
2.
Without more specific information about the user "League Circles", I can't provide details about their prior usernames. If you have more context or specific sources about this user, I'd be happy to help further.

Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
Dez
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,780
- And1: 9,354
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
You wrote your own description didn't you sco?
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
bledredwine
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,662
- And1: 5,792
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Add Reresin. He makes great points and observations.
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
- Jvaughn
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,171
- And1: 4,718
- Joined: May 18, 2009
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
This is BS. coldfish and Duck more insightful than me? BLASPHEMY 
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.
teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
Hangtime84
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,132
- And1: 4,778
- Joined: Aug 18, 2006
- Location: Rogers Park
-
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
That’s actually not bad
Jcool0 wrote:aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?
If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.
NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
- Michael Jackson
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 29,809
- And1: 11,825
- Joined: Jun 15, 2001
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
DuckIII wrote:No dougthonus references proves AI is already self-aware and attempting to manipulate mankind away from the truth.
I have to agree. Huge AI blindspot
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
-
sco
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,596
- And1: 9,283
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: OT: AI views on the Bulls RealGM forum
Michael Jackson wrote:DuckIII wrote:No dougthonus references proves AI is already self-aware and attempting to manipulate mankind away from the truth.
I have to agree. Huge AI blindspot
I went back and asked, and ChatGPT had no good reason. I'm with you guys!







