Jerry West vs Larry Bird

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Better player all time?

Jerry West
17
47%
Larry Bird
19
53%
 
Total votes: 36

User avatar
Narigo
Veteran
Posts: 2,780
And1: 872
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#1 » by Narigo » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:03 pm

Who do you think is a better player all time? Also, who is better on offense
Narigo's Fantasy Team

PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan

BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,176
And1: 30,870
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#2 » by tsherkin » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:05 pm

Narigo wrote:Who do you think is a better player all time?


Poll?
FuShengTHEGreat
Analyst
Posts: 3,046
And1: 1,405
Joined: Jan 02, 2010

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#3 » by FuShengTHEGreat » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:16 pm

Another case where just because player A had more rings than player B I still don't think he was greater.

Arguments for both but as for me its West > Bird due to being the superior playoff riser of the two. Other than rebounding and passing (both of which i don't think West was a slouch at himself) i think West was superior at every other facet of the game.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#4 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:27 pm

Bird is better on both and it's not even close.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,196
And1: 9,789
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:34 pm

One_and_Done wrote:Bird is better on both and it's not even close.


Because he's more modern, we get it. This despite the fact that West was not only the more explosive scorer but clearly the better defender plus he was one of history's playoff risers while Bird struggled to maintain his impact in playoff games. Would you have answered Bird if we asked which player stood out from the peers of his eras more without worrying about how strong that era was?

It's perfectly legit to say Bird is better; saying it without reason or analysis adds nothing to the conversation.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#6 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:43 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:Bird is better on both and it's not even close.


Because he's more modern, we get it. This despite the fact that West was not only the more explosive scorer but clearly the better defender plus he was one of history's playoff risers while Bird struggled to maintain his impact in playoff games. Would you have answered Bird if we asked which player stood out from the peers of his eras more without worrying about how strong that era was?

It's perfectly legit to say Bird is better; saying it without reason or analysis adds nothing to the conversation.

Where is the evidence of the Bird type lift for a team for West? Given that West played in the weaker era, it should be easy to spot, but it's not there.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,721
And1: 25,035
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#7 » by 70sFan » Mon Nov 4, 2024 8:46 pm

One_and_Done wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:Bird is better on both and it's not even close.


Because he's more modern, we get it. This despite the fact that West was not only the more explosive scorer but clearly the better defender plus he was one of history's playoff risers while Bird struggled to maintain his impact in playoff games. Would you have answered Bird if we asked which player stood out from the peers of his eras more without worrying about how strong that era was?

It's perfectly legit to say Bird is better; saying it without reason or analysis adds nothing to the conversation.

Where is the evidence of the Bird type lift for a team for West? Given that West played in the weaker era, it should be easy to spot, but it's not there.

West WOWY type numbers are better than Bird's.
ShotCreator
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,800
And1: 2,511
Joined: May 18, 2014
Location: CF
     

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#8 » by ShotCreator » Mon Nov 4, 2024 9:16 pm

West was a much better defender and pure shot creator and therefore playmaker IMO.

Not to say better...Scorer. But in terms of pure shot creation with or without a dribble, he is better than Bird.

Better finisher. Foul-drawer. Better athlete. Could gain separation to create easier than Larry.

It's rare you see a guy be inferior to a guy on impact but better in the ways I listed. Possible. But definitely rare.
Swinging for the fences.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#9 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 9:49 pm

70sFan wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
Because he's more modern, we get it. This despite the fact that West was not only the more explosive scorer but clearly the better defender plus he was one of history's playoff risers while Bird struggled to maintain his impact in playoff games. Would you have answered Bird if we asked which player stood out from the peers of his eras more without worrying about how strong that era was?

It's perfectly legit to say Bird is better; saying it without reason or analysis adds nothing to the conversation.

Where is the evidence of the Bird type lift for a team for West? Given that West played in the weaker era, it should be easy to spot, but it's not there.

West WOWY type numbers are better than Bird's.

I don't care about WOWY though.

Meanwhile the Lakers averaged 49.4 wins per year during West's career, despite him being surrounded by some incredible talent. If we chopped off his last 3 years that number would be even lower. The Lakers made the finals 2 years before West arrived with Baylor leading them. West had alot around him from the get go.

It was nothing like the turnaround Bird brought the Celtics.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,176
And1: 30,870
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#10 » by tsherkin » Mon Nov 4, 2024 9:51 pm

One_and_Done wrote:It was nothing like the turnaround Bird brought the Celtics.


Sure, but the turnaround with Bird's arrival also coincided with a bunch of other changes to Boston's roster and coaching, so it doesn't wholly reflect Bird's individual impact.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,767
And1: 11,295
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#11 » by Cavsfansince84 » Mon Nov 4, 2024 10:06 pm

I've had them very close and on a similar tier for quite a while. Close enough that if West had been fully healthy and had a strong playoff run in 72 I might have him higher. So maybe it does come down to Bird having 3 rings and helping to orchestrate such a huge turn around from 79 to 80. Not saying its right to have Bird higher and maybe West's playoff consistency and defense is enough to put him ahead but I think I have Bird at 10th and West at 11th all time.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#12 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 10:08 pm

tsherkin wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:It was nothing like the turnaround Bird brought the Celtics.


Sure, but the turnaround with Bird's arrival also coincided with a bunch of other changes to Boston's roster and coaching, so it doesn't wholly reflect Bird's individual impact.

Not 100%, but most of the other changes in 80 weren't needle movers. West joined a team that had made a finals run 2 years earlier, so even in era he did worse.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,176
And1: 30,870
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#13 » by tsherkin » Mon Nov 4, 2024 10:28 pm

One_and_Done wrote:Not 100%, but most of the other changes in 80 weren't needle movers. West joined a team that had made a finals run 2 years earlier, so even in era he did worse.


I think any one of those changes probably wasn't big, but there were a whole bunch.


I mean, AND Bird was awesome, obviously. But he didn't do it on his own and people do like to treat it as if that were the case.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#14 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 10:57 pm

tsherkin wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:Not 100%, but most of the other changes in 80 weren't needle movers. West joined a team that had made a finals run 2 years earlier, so even in era he did worse.


I think any one of those changes probably wasn't big, but there were a whole bunch.


I mean, AND Bird was awesome, obviously. But he didn't do it on his own and people do like to treat it as if that were the case.

We disagree. I feel it was mostly Bird.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,176
And1: 30,870
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#15 » by tsherkin » Mon Nov 4, 2024 11:00 pm

One_and_Done wrote:
tsherkin wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:Not 100%, but most of the other changes in 80 weren't needle movers. West joined a team that had made a finals run 2 years earlier, so even in era he did worse.


I think any one of those changes probably wasn't big, but there were a whole bunch.


I mean, AND Bird was awesome, obviously. But he didn't do it on his own and people do like to treat it as if that were the case.

We disagree. I feel it was mostly Bird.


I very much doubt Bird was responsible for their large defensive shift.

Steady coaching was helpful. Not having to play Cowens 37 mpg was helpful. Having a steady starting 5 was helpful. Having Tiny all year was helpful. The aggregate improvement from all of that stuff matters, and Boston's team improvement was large at either end.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,779
And1: 5,465
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#16 » by One_and_Done » Mon Nov 4, 2024 11:12 pm

tsherkin wrote:
One_and_Done wrote:
tsherkin wrote:
I think any one of those changes probably wasn't big, but there were a whole bunch.


I mean, AND Bird was awesome, obviously. But he didn't do it on his own and people do like to treat it as if that were the case.

We disagree. I feel it was mostly Bird.


I very much doubt Bird was responsible for their large defensive shift.

Steady coaching was helpful. Not having to play Cowens 37 mpg was helpful. Having a steady starting 5 was helpful. Having Tiny all year was helpful. The aggregate improvement from all of that stuff matters, and Boston's team improvement was large at either end.

I mean, I don't think Tiny helped their D either. The team didn't really add much extra defensive talent, so I don't think it was personnel that improved it. However, I think Bird is responsible in 3 ways:
1) Bird brought an organiser to the team, who helped co-ordinate their defensive efforts. His floor game was huge.
2) Bird was a better defender in 80, and was always strong on help D.
3) Bird taking on the load on offense, and running the offense, gave other role players more energy to focus on D.

I'd also warn about overrating the role of the Celtics D with this binary thinking about D and O as 50% components that equally contributed to winning. The offense improved much more than the D did anyway.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 91,176
And1: 30,870
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#17 » by tsherkin » Mon Nov 4, 2024 11:14 pm

One_and_Done wrote:I mean, I don't think Tiny helped their D either. The team didn't really add much extra defensive talent, I think Bird is responsible in 3 ways:


Neither do I. I suspect his impact was more offensive, for sure.

1) Bird brought an organiser to the team, who helped co-ordinate their defensive efforts. His floor game was huge.
2) Bird was a better defender in 80, and was always strong on help D.


Sure, but they made a swing from a +2.6 defense to a -3.4 defense. That was not Bird alone, and I don't think him becoming the centerpiece of the offense was enough to give everyone else the energy to do that either.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,863
And1: 11,698
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#18 » by eminence » Tue Nov 5, 2024 12:13 am

I've got Bird a solid step ahead on a 'best career' type list, better health/team success.

For better player, I'm not 100%, still lean Bird, would come down to team building needs/preferences.

Unlike some here I've got Bird solidly ahead on D up until the big injury. Might even prefer Bird relative to position (West a 1/2, Bird a 3/4). Position agnostic it's not close.
I bought a boat.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,767
And1: 11,295
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#19 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Nov 5, 2024 12:41 am

eminence wrote:I've got Bird a solid step ahead on a 'best career' type list, better health/team success.

For better player, I'm not 100%, still lean Bird, would come down to team building needs/preferences.

Unlike some here I've got Bird solidly ahead on D up until the big injury. Might even prefer Bird relative to position (West a 1/2, Bird a 3/4). Position agnostic it's not close.


The thing is though that even if you have Bird ahead up until then that's only 6 seasons and then his defense starts falling off pretty fast while West was named all def 1st team from age 30-34(and likely would have been from age 25-29) and avged 2.6spg at age 35 even after all those injuries. Plus Bird was likely a big negative from 87 on defensively so I think West wins on defense by a pretty big margin.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,863
And1: 11,698
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Jerry West vs Larry Bird 

Post#20 » by eminence » Tue Nov 5, 2024 1:27 am

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
eminence wrote:I've got Bird a solid step ahead on a 'best career' type list, better health/team success.

For better player, I'm not 100%, still lean Bird, would come down to team building needs/preferences.

Unlike some here I've got Bird solidly ahead on D up until the big injury. Might even prefer Bird relative to position (West a 1/2, Bird a 3/4). Position agnostic it's not close.


The thing is though that even if you have Bird ahead up until then that's only 6 seasons and then his defense starts falling off pretty fast while West was named all def 1st team from age 30-34 and avged 2.6spg at age 35 even after all those injuries. Plus Bird was likely a big negative from 87 on defensively so I think West wins on defense by a pretty big margin.


I would still take Bird in later 80s seasons (maybe all the way through), just less solidly.

Bird was never a negative on D imo. We have a large WOWY sample from '90-'92 for Bird and he certainly doesn't look to fall into that class. Average at worst, and likely solidly above even in the 90's.
I bought a boat.

Return to Player Comparisons