panthermark wrote:The point is the last two games (and the 1st game), the offense looked like garbage. In those 3 games, Kmet had a total of 2 catches for 18 yards on 2 targets. So when you look at his numbers as a whole, that all came in about a 5 game stretch where the offense and CW were showing improvement....and where Kmet had 25 catches for 284 yards and 3TD's on scant 28 targets. That is 80 catch/1000 yard/10TD elite TE production within a somewhat more efficient offence than we are seeing right now.
This discussion reminds me of Minnesota implementing the Randy Ratio, where they decided that when we win we throw 40% of our passes to moss and throw deep ones or something. Instead of thinking, well when Randy Moss is able to beat the coverage and those throws make sense, we often win, but that just throwing them isn't what causes the wins.
We also played two of the worst defenses in the league in those other games, and so correlating the offensive success to Kmet's production isn't necessarily true vs correlating his production to the coverage and opportunities that existed within the games.
Generally speaking, I agree Kmet should be more than zero involved, just that those types of games happen sometimes, and that can be do to many reasons. Saying Kmet would have elite TE numbers if we only count his good games, isn't much of an argument to me, nor is saying, see how well we did when this guy who has never shown the capability to repeatedly have good games, had great games?
There is an issue of causality that I just disagree with in what I infer the points are being made relative to Kmet's quality as a player. I think it's good if we can get him involved, but I don't think he's a game breaking player that another team can't take away if they want to, and it's certainly possible teams started looking to defend him as more of a priority after a hot streak which is certainly just as reasonable and perhaps more reasonable as an alternative explanation than everyone involved just didn't think to ever throw him the ball.