Lakers-Bulls

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,482
And1: 43,626
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Lakers-Bulls 

Post#1 » by zimpy27 » Tue Nov 5, 2024 10:49 pm

Lakers get Ball, Vucevic
Lakers get better guard defense and a backup C that Davis could play alongside.

Bulls get DLo, Rui, Christie
Bulls move Vucevic for Rui and Christie, get worse short term to help the tank but get younger players for the rebuild. Value comes from the Lonzo-DLo swap. Perhaps DLo goes to a 3rd team interested in playmaking (Magic?).
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,425
And1: 14,175
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#2 » by HornetJail » Tue Nov 5, 2024 10:52 pm

I'm not seeing any real reason for the Bulls to take on distant future money for these dudes
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,339
And1: 31,632
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#3 » by cupcakesnake » Tue Nov 5, 2024 11:16 pm

Not clear what the value add is for the Bulls. Rui is too old to be a prospect, so they'd have to be into Max Christie as a prospect. No idea how the league values him (has gotten the Laker market hype, but has yet to produce at all. Currently shooting 28% from the field as the the Lakers try to give him rotation minutes).

I also don't see this as amazing for the Lakers. Lonzo Ball is a HUGE injury risk who might be an injury away from retiring. Vucevic is having a nice start to the season, but wow has he ever been awful the past few seasons. Soaking up possessions without providing any offensive value. Massive negative on/off his whole Bulls tenure. There's a chance the Lakers give up 2 starters for an injured player and a guy who's a negative on the court.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
Jody Smokz
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 20, 2015
 

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#4 » by Jody Smokz » Tue Nov 5, 2024 11:56 pm

This doesn't solve any of the Lakers issues and the Bulls don't really have a solid reason to make this deal.

zimpy27 wrote:Lakers get Ball, Vucevic
Lakers get better guard defense and a backup C that Davis could play alongside.

Bulls get DLo, Rui, Christie
Bulls move Vucevic for Rui and Christie, get worse short term to help the tank but get younger players for the rebuild. Value comes from the Lonzo-DLo swap. Perhaps DLo goes to a 3rd team interested in playmaking (Magic?).
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,975
And1: 2,369
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Lakers-Bulls 

Post#5 » by ChettheJet » Wed Nov 6, 2024 1:13 am

You leave the Bulls with ONLY Jalen Smith as a center. that makes it a non starter.

I don't see the Lakers giving up Rui for Vucevic just like there's no reason for the Bulls to swap an expiring Ball for an Expiring DLo. Lonzo Ball is a big gamble next year as a FA just like he is this year. I'm crazy but I can see Lonzo resigning with the Bulls at the minimum as a thank you for sticking by him when he has missed 2 3/4 seasons. He's got his money so he could resign to see if he's healthy enough to get back to full time.
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,811
And1: 10,485
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Lakers-Bulls 

Post#6 » by meekrab » Wed Nov 6, 2024 1:25 am

I'm pretty sure this exact trade got posted a while ago when Lonzo was being treated as 100% dead salary, so if it was fair then it should be considered heavily biased to the Lakers now.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,482
And1: 43,626
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#7 » by zimpy27 » Wed Nov 6, 2024 7:29 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:Not clear what the value add is for the Bulls. Rui is too old to be a prospect, so they'd have to be into Max Christie as a prospect. No idea how the league values him (has gotten the Laker market hype, but has yet to produce at all. Currently shooting 28% from the field as the the Lakers try to give him rotation minutes).

I also don't see this as amazing for the Lakers. Lonzo Ball is a HUGE injury risk who might be an injury away from retiring. Vucevic is having a nice start to the season, but wow has he ever been awful the past few seasons. Soaking up possessions without providing any offensive value. Massive negative on/off his whole Bulls tenure. There's a chance the Lakers give up 2 starters for an injured player and a guy who's a negative on the court.



Maybe an SRP or so needs to go to Bulls. I thought both Rui and Christie would be suitable long-term pieces for Bulls rebuild. Rui isn't developing but he provides a decent player.

Lakers are happy for the defense IMO. Lonzo is a risk but they'd take the risk to be contender status.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,339
And1: 31,632
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#8 » by cupcakesnake » Thu Nov 7, 2024 10:46 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:Not clear what the value add is for the Bulls. Rui is too old to be a prospect, so they'd have to be into Max Christie as a prospect. No idea how the league values him (has gotten the Laker market hype, but has yet to produce at all. Currently shooting 28% from the field as the the Lakers try to give him rotation minutes).

I also don't see this as amazing for the Lakers. Lonzo Ball is a HUGE injury risk who might be an injury away from retiring. Vucevic is having a nice start to the season, but wow has he ever been awful the past few seasons. Soaking up possessions without providing any offensive value. Massive negative on/off his whole Bulls tenure. There's a chance the Lakers give up 2 starters for an injured player and a guy who's a negative on the court.



Maybe an SRP or so needs to go to Bulls. I thought both Rui and Christie would be suitable long-term pieces for Bulls rebuild. Rui isn't developing but he provides a decent player.

Lakers are happy for the defense IMO. Lonzo is a risk but they'd take the risk to be contender status.


Seems wild to view Max Christie as an asset. Do Lakers fans like him?
We're talking about a third year player who has shown zero evidence of being a positive on the court, but is randomly locked in a realy chunk of guaranteed money. He even has a player option in 2028! He's very much a negative asset until he proves there's some value there. Shooting 28% and boasting a -33.1 on/off. I think I'm being reasonable in saying you'd need to convince a team to take on Christie's long term money by adding things into the deal.

Rui is okay and his contract is short. I can't picture a team viewing him as a definite positive asset though. Maybe if there was a positional need, but I don't see why the Bulls would be interested.

It seems like you'd like Lonzo and Vooch on the Lakers. To be fair, I dont think either Bull is valued very highly so they feel gettable. (Unless Vucevic keeps up this level of shooting, then he might have real value. He's balling out right now.) It doesn't seem like the Lakers are sending out positive value in this deal though. Russell's stock is pretty low. Seems like a garbage for garbage trade, but Vooch is balling right now and I bet the Bulls hold on to Lonzo to see if he can be healthy and bring back actual value.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,482
And1: 43,626
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#9 » by zimpy27 » Thu Nov 7, 2024 11:00 pm

cupcakesnake wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
cupcakesnake wrote:Not clear what the value add is for the Bulls. Rui is too old to be a prospect, so they'd have to be into Max Christie as a prospect. No idea how the league values him (has gotten the Laker market hype, but has yet to produce at all. Currently shooting 28% from the field as the the Lakers try to give him rotation minutes).

I also don't see this as amazing for the Lakers. Lonzo Ball is a HUGE injury risk who might be an injury away from retiring. Vucevic is having a nice start to the season, but wow has he ever been awful the past few seasons. Soaking up possessions without providing any offensive value. Massive negative on/off his whole Bulls tenure. There's a chance the Lakers give up 2 starters for an injured player and a guy who's a negative on the court.



Maybe an SRP or so needs to go to Bulls. I thought both Rui and Christie would be suitable long-term pieces for Bulls rebuild. Rui isn't developing but he provides a decent player.

Lakers are happy for the defense IMO. Lonzo is a risk but they'd take the risk to be contender status.


Seems wild to view Max Christie as an asset. Do Lakers fans like him?
We're talking about a third year player who has shown zero evidence of being a positive on the court, but is randomly locked in a realy chunk of guaranteed money. He even has a player option in 2028! He's very much a negative asset until he proves there's some value there. Shooting 28% and boasting a -33.1 on/off. I think I'm being reasonable in saying you'd need to convince a team to take on Christie's long term money by adding things into the deal.

Rui is okay and his contract is short. I can't picture a team viewing him as a definite positive asset though. Maybe if there was a positional need, but I don't see why the Bulls would be interested.

It seems like you'd like Lonzo and Vooch on the Lakers. To be fair, I dont think either Bull is valued very highly so they feel gettable. (Unless Vucevic keeps up this level of shooting, then he might have real value. He's balling out right now.) It doesn't seem like the Lakers are sending out positive value in this deal though. Russell's stock is pretty low. Seems like a garbage for garbage trade, but Vooch is balling right now and I bet the Bulls hold on to Lonzo to see if he can be healthy and bring back actual value.


Yeah Christie is well liked, hard working and the right mindset. He's missed out on development under Ham, he should have been given minutes over other guys, but he's still young and I'd expect him to be a starter level player in a few years.

If he's not seen as an asset then Lakers would keep him I'd say, his timeline just doesn't fit what team should be trying to do - contend now.

I'd like Lonzo and Vuc because they are gettable, I don't think Lakers FO are keen to move an FRP anymore unless it's multiple FRPs for a star level player. Lakers could come in with SRPs for this trade.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,082
And1: 8,958
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Lakrs-Bulls 

Post#10 » by Chi town » Fri Nov 8, 2024 5:48 pm

HornetJail wrote:I'm not seeing any real reason for the Bulls to take on distant future money for these dudes


Easy no.

Vuc is playing like Magic AS Vuc.

Don’t think Lakers want a C either.

Think Bulls can get a protected 1st years out for Vuc if he keeps up his play. I’d add our POR 1st if it could get us a 1st in this draft.
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,066
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Lakers-Bulls 

Post#11 » by One_and_Done » Sat Nov 9, 2024 7:52 am

Lakers have no use for Vuc.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
scottyg
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,260
And1: 89
Joined: Oct 23, 2009

Re: Lakers-Bulls 

Post#12 » by scottyg » Sun Nov 10, 2024 7:37 pm

Let's re tool the trade - bulls, lakers, pistons ,

Lakers get -
- Vucevic
- Torey Craig
-Javon Carter

Bulls get -
- Isaiah Stewert

Pistons get -
-Deangelo Russell
- Hood-Schifino
- Jaxon Hayes
- Christian Wood

Return to Trades and Transactions