WarriorGM wrote:That Jokic is always being portrayed as having a weak team may be a symptom of a deeper structural issue and that issue may well be that Jokic plays the center position. You ask could Tatum carry a team with Murray and MPJ to a great record? I'm thinking why not? The advantage Tatum would have is that without Jokic the center position opens up to a more natural defensive fit. The problem with Jokic being capable of doing everything is that he ends up doing everything.
is this some kind of joke ?
if not, it is showing one of the greatest ignorance of basketball knowledge.
Especially giving all Front Office faults to Jokic may be symptom of most idiotic basketball argument of all time.
Tatum play with two all defensive caliber defender, potentially 4 all star level player. By the way Jokic best teammate is Murray, at best is average guard in this league. After seeing Jokic with Westbrook I'm in very doubt Murray can be a starter in any non Jokic team.
And Celtics won just 7 more games than Denver. Exchange Jokic with Tatum + defensive center gives 64 w to Denver ? It is more than absurt.
Jokic is doing everything ???? Are you sure ???
This dude's usage rate is 29 ?? Only superstars in modern era with that type of usage rate are Bird and Duncan. Jokic is probably best ever player to involve his teammates to the game. Jokic average touch time is 2,6. There is 191 players ahead of him.
If your argument is Jokic doing everything, is totatlly nonsense. Because Tatum hold the ball longer than Jokic.
With Tatum + defensive center makes Denver barely a play-in team, actually in the west I doubt it. they cant be a play-in team














