Sexton to Detroit
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Sexton to Detroit
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,564
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Sexton to Detroit
DET trades: Tim Hardaway Jr., Wendell Moore, 2025 TOR 2nd, 2027 BRK/DAL 2nd (less favorable), 2029 MIL 2nd
UTA trades: Collin Sexton
Why DET does it: put together a really nice three guard rotation that can keep the offense running for 48 minutes. Sexton is all energy, a very efficient scorer, and a much improved distributor (still not a pure PG, but solid enough as a primary ball handler for stretches). They get him for cheap, just expiring contracts and three decent future 2nds.
Why UTA does it: I love Sexton, but we have way too many combo guards and scoring combo guards unfortunately have very little trade value even when they are excellent. I think Sexton is going to win us several games, and given that we keep drafting guards I'm not sure he is in the long-term plans of this team (even though *I* think he is one of three clear keepers on this team in he, Lauri, and Walker). Given where things are going, I think you reset the cap sheet a bit and extract as many assets as you can. Moore and Hardaway can just be bought out and we can sign someone from the gleague that interests us (e.g., give Micah Potter a regular contract).
UTA trades: Collin Sexton
Why DET does it: put together a really nice three guard rotation that can keep the offense running for 48 minutes. Sexton is all energy, a very efficient scorer, and a much improved distributor (still not a pure PG, but solid enough as a primary ball handler for stretches). They get him for cheap, just expiring contracts and three decent future 2nds.
Why UTA does it: I love Sexton, but we have way too many combo guards and scoring combo guards unfortunately have very little trade value even when they are excellent. I think Sexton is going to win us several games, and given that we keep drafting guards I'm not sure he is in the long-term plans of this team (even though *I* think he is one of three clear keepers on this team in he, Lauri, and Walker). Given where things are going, I think you reset the cap sheet a bit and extract as many assets as you can. Moore and Hardaway can just be bought out and we can sign someone from the gleague that interests us (e.g., give Micah Potter a regular contract).

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,218
- And1: 3,352
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Sexton to Detroit
From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,564
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Billl wrote:From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
FWIW I imagine something like this:
PG: Cunningham 32/Sexton 16/Sasser
SG: Ivey 32/Sexton 14/Beasley 4
I think there are minutes there for Sexton, but I can also see preferring to keep picks. Sexton is well worth his money, though.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,901
- And1: 1,238
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
I don't know about the Pistons, but if this is what Jazz are looking for (a few SRPs + matching expirings) they should have no problem finding a taker. But I bet Danny feels different.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,564
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
wemby wrote:I don't know about the Pistons, but if this is what Jazz are looking for (a few SRPs + matching expirings) they should have no problem finding a taker. But I bet Danny feels different.
Yah, I think Danny wants two firsts just like he reportedly did with Kessler. I think Sexton is damn good and in a vacuum is probably worth two late firsts, but there are SO MANY good combo guards that I think it depresses value a ton.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,905
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Billl wrote:From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,218
- And1: 3,352
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Sexton to Detroit
jbk1234 wrote:Billl wrote:From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,550
- And1: 1,994
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: Sexton to Detroit
I actually don’t mind this trade, although I’m not looking to cough up Torontos second.
I will quote this article from si.com though
We then trade for Tim, get a new coach, and (small sample size, but) Cades off to a pretty impressive start. I really wouldn’t want to mess with that.
I will quote this article from si.com though
Mavs’ Hardaway Mentored Pistons’ Cunningham Before Season-Ending Surgery
Detroit Pistons young star Cade Cunningham had season-ending shin surgery in mid-December. Dallas Mavericks veteran Tim Hardaway Jr.’s advice made Cunningham feel more comfortable going through with his decision.
Dalton Trigg | Jan 17, 2023
We then trade for Tim, get a new coach, and (small sample size, but) Cades off to a pretty impressive start. I really wouldn’t want to mess with that.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,582
- And1: 757
- Joined: Jan 12, 2018
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Billl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Billl wrote:From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I completely understand the sentiment, I just wanted to point out that sextons only at $18m.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,218
- And1: 3,352
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Sexton to Detroit
bkohler wrote:Billl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I completely understand the sentiment, I just wanted to point out that sextons only at $18m.
You are 100% correct. Was looking at Collins number. It's still too much for a backup for us.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,044
- And1: 8,564
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Billl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Billl wrote:From detroit, I don't think we would do that swap even without the picks. That's too much money for a backup pg for the next 2 years.
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I disagree with this because it is not looking at the overall cap sheet, just Sexton in a vacuum.
Sexton expires next year, before any Ivey extension kicks in. For next summer, Detroit is already pretty much locked into operating over the cap, but nowhere near paying taxes ==> Sexton would be an expiring contract in 2025-26, with possibly some trade value. Adding Sexton's salary keeps Detroit in the "over the cap, far under the tax" range where we can use our exceptions and still have a bit of space to take on extra salaries in trade.
I do agree that Sexton is overpaid by a bit. Detroit is getting compensated for that with the SRPs. I think it is a fair debate whether Detroit should take extra SRPs, or hold out for something more valuable with its ability to absorb some money. But getting 3 SRPs with Sexton is fair value (or close to it).
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,218
- And1: 3,352
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: Sexton to Detroit
oldncreaky wrote:Billl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I disagree with this because it is not looking at the overall cap sheet, just Sexton in a vacuum.
Sexton expires next year, before any Ivey extension kicks in. For next summer, Detroit is already pretty much locked into operating over the cap, but nowhere near paying taxes ==> Sexton would be an expiring contract in 2025-26, with possibly some trade value. Adding Sexton's salary keeps Detroit in the "over the cap, far under the tax" range where we can use our exceptions and still have a bit of space to take on extra salaries in trade.
I do agree that Sexton is overpaid by a bit. Detroit is getting compensated for that with the SRPs. I think it is a fair debate whether Detroit should take extra SRPs, or hold out for something more valuable with its ability to absorb some money. But getting 3 SRPs with Sexton is fair value (or close to it).
The trade is detroit giving up 3 second rounders to overpay sexton.
Also, our cap sheet is not going to look the same as it does today. All the young guys are being evaluated up to the trade deadline. It's highly unlikely langdon just decides to keep everyone
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,430
- And1: 17,229
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Sexton is a positive value contract and easily worth a 1st, I'd give Mavs 25 1st for him w/o hesitation, but Mavs don't have the matching salary...
In Detroit next to big PG like Cade, he should be a great fit.
In Detroit next to big PG like Cade, he should be a great fit.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,044
- And1: 8,564
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Billl wrote:oldncreaky wrote:Billl wrote:
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I disagree with this because it is not looking at the overall cap sheet, just Sexton in a vacuum.
Sexton expires next year, before any Ivey extension kicks in. For next summer, Detroit is already pretty much locked into operating over the cap, but nowhere near paying taxes ==> Sexton would be an expiring contract in 2025-26, with possibly some trade value. Adding Sexton's salary keeps Detroit in the "over the cap, far under the tax" range where we can use our exceptions and still have a bit of space to take on extra salaries in trade.
I do agree that Sexton is overpaid by a bit. Detroit is getting compensated for that with the SRPs. I think it is a fair debate whether Detroit should take extra SRPs, or hold out for something more valuable with its ability to absorb some money. But getting 3 SRPs with Sexton is fair value (or close to it).
The trade is detroit giving up 3 second rounders to overpay sexton.
Also, our cap sheet is not going to look the same as it does today. All the young guys are being evaluated up to the trade deadline. It's highly unlikely langdon just decides to keep everyone
Oops, did I ever miss it! You are right, and I was wrong.
Yeah, there's absolutely no way I'd give up value for Sexton, or really anyone who would play the role of 3rd guard. We have much bigger issues/questions to answer, and Bickerstaff has kept the 2nd unit running well simply by staggering Ivey/Cade -- which in itself is a good sign. If I was going to add a 3rd guard to that mix, the first thing I'd want is D, and that is not Sexton's thing
Still wouldn't mind taking on $15-20M in salary that expires next year -- as long as it came with appropriate draft compensation
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Sexton to Detroit
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,053
- And1: 17,564
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
oldncreaky wrote:Billl wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I don't think it's too much money for a really good sixth man which is what Sexton is. The are other issues: 1) Is Sexton willing to accept that he's a sixth man on a good team; 2) do the Pistons want to win this year, or is losing close/competitive games preferable; and 3) how would JBB feel about a reunion.
Maybe a contending team can justify $26 million for a 6th man. We're still a rebuilding team that is going to need to upgrade 2-3 starter spots before trying to make any real sort of run.
I disagree with this because it is not looking at the overall cap sheet, just Sexton in a vacuum.
Sexton expires next year, before any Ivey extension kicks in. For next summer, Detroit is already pretty much locked into operating over the cap, but nowhere near paying taxes ==> Sexton would be an expiring contract in 2025-26, with possibly some trade value. Adding Sexton's salary keeps Detroit in the "over the cap, far under the tax" range where we can use our exceptions and still have a bit of space to take on extra salaries in trade.
I do agree that Sexton is overpaid by a bit. Detroit is getting compensated for that with the SRPs. I think it is a fair debate whether Detroit should take extra SRPs, or hold out for something more valuable with its ability to absorb some money. But getting 3 SRPs with Sexton is fair value (or close to it).
You are giving 2nds in this deal. Sexton is worth his money, he is a 60%TS player who can average 18-22ppg depending on his minutes, and is a reasonable lead ball handler in many units. He is a bad defender, but at least not for lack of effort, just lack of size. His advance metrics over the last three years are eerily similar to Zach LaVine. But if Detroit isn't interested in another guard, that makes sense.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,767
- And1: 4,603
- Joined: Jun 12, 2003
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Ainge isn't going to make that deal. He basically already gave away NAW and Agbaji but Sexton is a better player and still fairly young at 25. He's also going to work hard despite being on a bad team which is what Danny wants next to the kids. It's too bad because a team like Dallas could really use his scoring but I believe Collin is stuck for this season on the tanking Jazz along with Lauri.
I would guess if Ainge makes any deal by the deadline for picks it would likely involve Kessler who could potentially bring back a premium FRP.
I would guess if Ainge makes any deal by the deadline for picks it would likely involve Kessler who could potentially bring back a premium FRP.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,094
- And1: 2,001
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
Keep hardaway and deal Reed+Sasser or Sasser and Moore if that works with our $10million in cap space.
Re: Sexton to Detroit
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Sexton to Detroit
I like this Detroit roster. I don't think we need any trades around the margins. If a superstar offer presents itself to allow us to pair Cade and them, it's worth considering, but I think letting this developmental year play out and using our next draft pick is our best direction.
Return to Trades and Transactions