Lakers-Nets

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,486
And1: 43,630
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Lakers-Nets 

Post#1 » by zimpy27 » Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:01 pm

Lakers get CamJ, Schroeder, Milton

Nets get DLo, Rui, JHS, LAL29FRP



Nets do the trade for the FRP and to get worse this season for the 2025 draft.

Lakers do the trade to improve their rotation.
Gabe, Reaves, CamJ, LeBron, Davis
Schroeder, Knecht, Vando, Wood
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 3,470
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#2 » by Decipher » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:24 pm

Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age
JB2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,797
And1: 7,602
Joined: Mar 10, 2009

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#3 » by JB2 » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:45 pm

Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,591
And1: 6,234
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#4 » by gswhoops » Tue Nov 12, 2024 9:55 pm

JB2 wrote:Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?

Lakers don't have the assets to get Claxton AND CamJ
JB2
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,797
And1: 7,602
Joined: Mar 10, 2009

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#5 » by JB2 » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:27 pm

gswhoops wrote:
JB2 wrote:Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?

Lakers don't have the assets to get Claxton AND CamJ


29 1st, 31 1st, 28 swap, AR, Knecht... they do have the assets. Will they be willing to pay the price BK would ask? That's a different conversation. But Nets clearly want to tank and aren't starting Claxton so maybe the price isn't sky high.
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 3,470
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#6 » by Decipher » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:47 pm

JB2 wrote:Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?


Claxton was injured then on minutes restrictions

He’s starting now
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#7 » by Scoot McGroot » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:48 pm

JB2 wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
JB2 wrote:Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?

Lakers don't have the assets to get Claxton AND CamJ


29 1st, 31 1st, 28 swap, AR, Knecht... they do have the assets. Will they be willing to pay the price BK would ask? That's a different conversation. But Nets clearly want to tank and aren't starting Claxton so maybe the price isn't sky high.


Hamstring injury recovery and resultant minutes restriction. He’s now started 4 games in a row.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,486
And1: 43,630
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#8 » by zimpy27 » Wed Nov 13, 2024 2:03 am

Decipher wrote:Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age


Maybe DFS+CamJ is a better target.


Lakers get CamJ, DFS

Nets get DLo, Rui, Christie, LAL29FRP(unprotected)
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 3,470
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#9 » by Decipher » Wed Nov 13, 2024 2:21 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Decipher wrote:Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age


Maybe DFS+CamJ is a better target.


Lakers get CamJ, DFS

Nets get DLo, Rui, Christie, LAL29FRP(unprotected)


I don’t see the need to trade Cam unless we’re blown away with the offer as he’s not old, worth his contract and plays a valuable position

His main issues is injury but he will be worth the same next season so might as well hang out for a great deal
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#10 » by R-DAWG » Wed Nov 13, 2024 11:44 am

I can’t see the Lakers moving a 1st rd pick for role players unless we get to Feb and they are in contention for a top 2 seed in the West.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,047
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#11 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Nov 13, 2024 1:56 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
Decipher wrote:Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age


Maybe DFS+CamJ is a better target.


Lakers get CamJ, DFS

Nets get DLo, Rui, Christie, LAL29FRP(unprotected)



I wouldn’t pitch Christie in trades until midseason. Until he’s put together some solid play for awhile, he’s a bad contract. If LA has faith in him, hey need to hold him until that faith pays off a little bit. Because no one else is going to pay them for it not showing yet. At this point, he’s on a slightly larger contract than Donovan Clingan, but fully gtd and with no team protection if he doesn’t develop.

I’m not writing him off yet, but he’s simply LA’s guy they believe in until he proves more on the court.
Jody Smokz
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 1,436
Joined: May 20, 2015
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#12 » by Jody Smokz » Wed Nov 13, 2024 2:00 pm

The Lakers aren't moving an unprotected 1st for this group that is only a slight upgrade due to fit not talent.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,817
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#13 » by jbk1234 » Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:15 pm

Decipher wrote:Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age


No one is trading an unprotected 1st for DFS. Honestly, I think the Nets woukd be crazy to turn one down for Cam on his contract.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,241
And1: 496
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#14 » by JKiddy » Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:04 pm

Jody Smokz wrote:The Lakers aren't moving an unprotected 1st for this group that is only a slight upgrade due to fit not talent.


If the Lakers added more to this deal it might happen. This would result in the Lakers being contenders again. I do not think Lakers haters would like this (not one here but just saying.... they would flip out!!!!)
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,591
And1: 6,234
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#15 » by gswhoops » Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:09 pm

JB2 wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
JB2 wrote:Can this trade be expanded to include Claxton- and for Nets fans, why is Claxton not starting?

Lakers don't have the assets to get Claxton AND CamJ


29 1st, 31 1st, 28 swap, AR, Knecht... they do have the assets. Will they be willing to pay the price BK would ask? That's a different conversation. But Nets clearly want to tank and aren't starting Claxton so maybe the price isn't sky high.

Yeah fair enough. I assumed AR was off the table but if they throw him in things could get interesting.

At the end of the day if I were the Nets, I'd probably do Claxton and CamJo for Knecht and 2 unprotected 1sts (and whatever filler contracts LAL wanted to dump) but they seem to be hesitant to go full tank & rebuild.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,241
And1: 496
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#16 » by JKiddy » Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:24 pm

Claxton is not going anywhere now. I think they need to see who they pair him with next season with Cam Thomas and Clowney. It seems like they are going to build around Cam Thomas, Claxton, Clowney, Wilson, and bring in a FA or 2 with the new rookies next season and then re-evaluate then. They likely keep one or two veterans to make the transition easier.

If the Lakers can get either DFS or CamJo for only 1 1st and a player that is a win for LAL.
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 5,778
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#17 » by ConSarnit » Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:21 pm

zimpy27 wrote:Lakers get CamJ, Schroeder, Milton

Nets get DLo, Rui, JHS, LAL29FRP



Nets do the trade for the FRP and to get worse this season for the 2025 draft.

Lakers do the trade to improve their rotation.
Gabe, Reaves, CamJ, LeBron, Davis
Schroeder, Knecht, Vando, Wood


Is Vincent even playable anymore? And you have him starting?
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,486
And1: 43,630
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#18 » by zimpy27 » Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:38 pm

ConSarnit wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Lakers get CamJ, Schroeder, Milton

Nets get DLo, Rui, JHS, LAL29FRP



Nets do the trade for the FRP and to get worse this season for the 2025 draft.

Lakers do the trade to improve their rotation.
Gabe, Reaves, CamJ, LeBron, Davis
Schroeder, Knecht, Vando, Wood


Is Vincent even playable anymore? And you have him starting?


He's a guy that brings defense and ideally some shooting. Defense is there but shooting is not. He may not be in rotation, it might be Reddish instead.

Schroeder would slot into DLo role off the bench to support that group.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,908
And1: 1,574
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#19 » by ecuhus1981 » Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:00 pm

You can't get both Cam J and Schröder from us for a single 1st
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,486
And1: 43,630
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Lakers-Nets 

Post#20 » by zimpy27 » Wed Nov 13, 2024 9:30 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Decipher wrote:Replace Cam with DFS & I would do it

DFS is the odd one out on the Nets due to age


Maybe DFS+CamJ is a better target.


Lakers get CamJ, DFS

Nets get DLo, Rui, Christie, LAL29FRP(unprotected)



I wouldn’t pitch Christie in trades until midseason. Until he’s put together some solid play for awhile, he’s a bad contract. If LA has faith in him, hey need to hold him until that faith pays off a little bit. Because no one else is going to pay them for it not showing yet. At this point, he’s on a slightly larger contract than Donovan Clingan, but fully gtd and with no team protection if he doesn’t develop.

I’m not writing him off yet, but he’s simply LA’s guy they believe in until he proves more on the court.



Yeah that's fair. His main issue is offense, in particular he doesn't seem ready to slot into a spot up shooter role. He's still trying to show off his 3-level scorer skills, to be bigger than the role Reddick planned. So that's the battle at the moment.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie

Return to Trades and Transactions