aggo wrote:its so clear to me, after watching indiana and now 76ers
that we should start mitch.
why?
zoomed-out reasoning:
1/ we have a top 2 offense, and a ranked 20th defense
2/ takes defensive pressure off kat to start the game. allows us to become more un-predictable with our defensive coverages in the 1-5 pnr.
3/ takes foul pressure off kat to start the game
4/ gives better bench balance by sliding josh hart to bench. he will still play 30+ minutes
zoomed-in reasoning:
1/ we've got to get the most out of the 20 minutes from mitch. does that mean we play him with the bench or the starters? where will we get more production out of him?
2/ we need to be able to play mitch with the starters, because in the playoffs (more half court sets) we are going to end the game with mitch on the court in the 4th quarter. he needs to play with the starters.
3/ we already know KAT at the 4 works.
4/ this is not us running away from 5 out. it means we are going to play 5 out less.
I think it should be situationally and based on who we're playing, especially since Hart is now the secondary creator in the starting 5. You remove him from the lineup and we are much easier to defend because there's no push in transition off his rebounds and you lose the hub passer from the top of the 3 point line. He's being used a lot more like Draymond now.
A more progressive coach would look at who we're playing, their strengths and weaknesses and start Hart or Mitch/Precious based on that.