Yeezus_ wrote:ItsDanger wrote:11-2 team signs him but not good enough for a 2-11 team?
Lol what kind of logic is this?
That poster has logic ?
Moderators: niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, Morris_Shatford, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88

Yeezus_ wrote:ItsDanger wrote:11-2 team signs him but not good enough for a 2-11 team?
Lol what kind of logic is this?
ontnut wrote:Lol calm your teets. He's just a 7 foot body they can use for a few weeks until Chet is back, then back to the G league he goes. I liked him in summer league, but he's clearly not ready to be a full time NBA player.

Thaddy wrote:We should have kept him instead of Fernando. That decision was another dumb decision even though its on a small scale. The last 5 champions all had a stretch big man (or Draymond).
Phezmo123 wrote:bonjovi0308 wrote:Okc gm is being cheap here. They are a contender and they sign someone who couldn't even beat Burno for a spot on a nba team?
they should be cheap cause ur really just signing ur 3rd string center
Thaddy wrote:We should have kept him instead of Fernando. That decision was another dumb decision even though its on a small scale. The last 5 champions all had a stretch big man (or Draymond).
Duffman100 wrote:Thaddy wrote:We should have kept him instead of Fernando. That decision was another dumb decision even though its on a small scale. The last 5 champions all had a stretch big man (or Draymond).
Except you actually need the stretch big man to actually ... ya know... play.

Thaddy wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Thaddy wrote:We should have kept him instead of Fernando. That decision was another dumb decision even though its on a small scale. The last 5 champions all had a stretch big man (or Draymond).
Except you actually need the stretch big man to actually ... ya know... play.
He's 24 so I would see him as a draft pick that's immediately playable. I think if we ramped him up he could have been at least as usable as Mogbo or similar to Fernando in production.
Shakril wrote:Thaddy wrote:We should have kept him instead of Fernando. That decision was another dumb decision even though its on a small scale. The last 5 champions all had a stretch big man (or Draymond).
Wrong:
Lakers had Dwight (AD was playing as a PF back then and he isnt even good at 3)
Warriors - sorry you cant exclude them only cause its draymond, the literally are playing without a center or Looney
Denver - Jokic is their main guy, like embid, you build around those, so it doesnt matter if they can shoot the 3 or not
Milwaukee - yes Lopez i give you that
Boston - JP was essentially injured, Al horford played can shoot the 3, but was not the reason he played. But i am willing to give you that.
Out of the last 5,
two didnt have a strech 5,
1 was a superstar that just happen to be good at shooting 3, but he would have played regardless if he is a shooter or not,
1 team had so many shooters that it wouldnot have mattered if they have a strech 5 or not.
Only with the Bucks i believe it was important for them to have a strech 5 to win the title.
The obsession with shooting bigs or 3s in generell makes people blind to all the other things that go into winning a title.


Duffman100 wrote:Thaddy wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
Except you actually need the stretch big man to actually ... ya know... play.
He's 24 so I would see him as a draft pick that's immediately playable. I think if we ramped him up he could have been at least as usable as Mogbo or similar to Fernando in production.
I think you comparing Carlsson to the stretch bigs (Jokic, Draymond, Porky, Horford) is laughable and not a genuine argument
Yeezus_ wrote:ItsDanger wrote:11-2 team signs him but not good enough for a 2-11 team?
Lol what kind of logic is this?
