mpharris36 wrote:DaGawd wrote:is the szn over yet
its crazy there is 6 more games of this crap.
we need a sim to end of season button irl
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
mpharris36 wrote:DaGawd wrote:is the szn over yet
its crazy there is 6 more games of this crap.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:mpharris36 wrote:DaGawd wrote:is the szn over yet
its crazy there is 6 more games of this crap.
we need a sim to end of season button irl

DaGawd wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
its crazy there is 6 more games of this crap.
we need a sim to end of season button irl
dead ass


TerrenceClarke wrote:you know whats the Nastiest work?
After Schoen spent all that money in the offseason. I said there is no way we can be worse than last year..... You spend a ton of money to get better right? Right?
mpharris36 wrote:Synciere wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
As much as seeing what happened last night sucks, Saquon could rush for 400 yards next Sunday and letting him go was still the right move. Paying RBs big money when the team is so structurally flawed on both sides of the ball isn't going to fix things either.
I can't compare that to the Giants drafting a QB prospect. We have to take the best player available and develop them. If it's Sanders or Ward, great. If it's Travis Hunter, I'm fine with that too
The fact that you’re still willing to say letting Saquon go was the right move in spite of his production and contract is beyond me. There are some players who can’t be reduced to their position. There’s always exceptions to rules; if you can’t see that by now………
We shouldn’t pay for runningbacks. We should overpay for mediocre quarterbacks instead.
thats not what he's saying.
He's saying if we kept Saquan the Giants would still be a huge pile of ****. How do we know that...the organization has been a huge pile of ****.
Bottom out is not the worse thing here...we have yet to truly bottom out we always find a way to win a few meaningless games that put us out of the range of improving that overpaid mediocre QB you talk about.
We need a roster overhaul and paying Barkley makes little to no sense for where we are at. You say things can change quickly in the NFL...maybe but lets no act like Barkley was also some model of health and longevity here.
He thriving behind an elite offense that is basically scoring the same amount of PPG they have been the last 3-4 years. Its putting a talented player in a system that works for him. It didn't work here
Sorry if I didn't want a sub 4 ypc RB making 14 MM while the rest of the roster is bad. He's avg over 6 yards per carry with Philly the only time he even sniffed 5 ypc was his rookie year.
Yes it sucks to see him playing really well for a rival but what he is doing in Philly would simply not even be closely replicable if he was playing RB for the Giants...not this year not next year.
And just because he's having a great season doesn't mean it made sense to draft him #2 which was one of the worst decisions a franchise can make. You can't build around a RB...this is a great example of that. RB's are valued in a system not a RB makes a system.
Deeeez Knicks wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:you know whats the Nastiest work?
After Schoen spent all that money in the offseason. I said there is no way we can be worse than last year..... You spend a ton of money to get better right? Right?
They even traded picks
Deeeez Knicks wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:you know whats the Nastiest work?
After Schoen spent all that money in the offseason. I said there is no way we can be worse than last year..... You spend a ton of money to get better right? Right?
They even traded picks


TerrenceClarke wrote:So MPH..... is Schoen Still better than Getty?
mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:So MPH..... is Schoen Still better than Getty?
They both suck.

TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:So MPH..... is Schoen Still better than Getty?
They both suck.
well at least you did not spin it with an excuse.
I was expecting something different.
mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
They both suck.
well at least you did not spin it with an excuse.
I was expecting something different.
nah I'm a results guy. Ultimately we have a Mara issue though because I don't trust him wiping the slate clean and making the right hires.
I tried to give Schoen a benefit of the doubt because he inherited a mess from Gettleman. Terrible cap situation, very limited talent pool, and a non modernized organization (we were using draft books) instead of digital technology draft room! So I appreciate Schoen modernizing the FO...and I roughly agree with his concepts about positional value.
But the team has trended downhill after there 1st season. I think 3 years is enough. I also now have seen 3 draft classes that haven't been impressive to say I'm not interested in seeing a 4th one.

Ghetto Gospel wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:
well at least you did not spin it with an excuse.
I was expecting something different.
nah I'm a results guy. Ultimately we have a Mara issue though because I don't trust him wiping the slate clean and making the right hires.
I tried to give Schoen a benefit of the doubt because he inherited a mess from Gettleman. Terrible cap situation, very limited talent pool, and a non modernized organization (we were using draft books) instead of digital technology draft room! So I appreciate Schoen modernizing the FO...and I roughly agree with his concepts about positional value.
But the team has trended downhill after there 1st season. I think 3 years is enough. I also now have seen 3 draft classes that haven't been impressive to say I'm not interested in seeing a 4th one.
at first, i was satisfied with his drafts because they "aligned" with whatever the consensus mocks had as the best players and all that.
but honestly, fck all that, i need to see our picks starting to win and make real impacts on the field
Ghetto Gospel wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:
well at least you did not spin it with an excuse.
I was expecting something different.
nah I'm a results guy. Ultimately we have a Mara issue though because I don't trust him wiping the slate clean and making the right hires.
I tried to give Schoen a benefit of the doubt because he inherited a mess from Gettleman. Terrible cap situation, very limited talent pool, and a non modernized organization (we were using draft books) instead of digital technology draft room! So I appreciate Schoen modernizing the FO...and I roughly agree with his concepts about positional value.
But the team has trended downhill after there 1st season. I think 3 years is enough. I also now have seen 3 draft classes that haven't been impressive to say I'm not interested in seeing a 4th one.
at first, i was satisfied with his drafts because they "aligned" with whatever the consensus mocks had as the best players and all that.
but honestly, fck all that, i need to see our picks starting to win and make real impacts on the field
mpharris36 wrote:Synciere wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
As much as seeing what happened last night sucks, Saquon could rush for 400 yards next Sunday and letting him go was still the right move. Paying RBs big money when the team is so structurally flawed on both sides of the ball isn't going to fix things either.
I can't compare that to the Giants drafting a QB prospect. We have to take the best player available and develop them. If it's Sanders or Ward, great. If it's Travis Hunter, I'm fine with that too
The fact that you’re still willing to say letting Saquon go was the right move in spite of his production and contract is beyond me. There are some players who can’t be reduced to their position. There’s always exceptions to rules; if you can’t see that by now………
We shouldn’t pay for runningbacks. We should overpay for mediocre quarterbacks instead.
thats not what he's saying.
He's saying if we kept Saquan the Giants would still be a huge pile of ****. How do we know that...the organization has been a huge pile of ****.
Bottom out is not the worse thing here...we have yet to truly bottom out we always find a way to win a few meaningless games that put us out of the range of improving that overpaid mediocre QB you talk about.
We need a roster overhaul and paying Barkley makes little to no sense for where we are at. You say things can change quickly in the NFL...maybe but lets no act like Barkley was also some model of health and longevity here.
He thriving behind an elite offense that is basically scoring the same amount of PPG they have been the last 3-4 years. Its putting a talented player in a system that works for him. It didn't work here
Sorry if I didn't want a sub 4 ypc RB making 14 MM while the rest of the roster is bad. He's avg over 6 yards per carry with Philly the only time he even sniffed 5 ypc was his rookie year.
Yes it sucks to see him playing really well for a rival but what he is doing in Philly would simply not even be closely replicable if he was playing RB for the Giants...not this year not next year.
And just because he's having a great season doesn't mean it made sense to draft him #2 which was one of the worst decisions a franchise can make. You can't build around a RB...this is a great example of that. RB's are valued in a system not a RB makes a system.

Synciere wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Synciere wrote:
The fact that you’re still willing to say letting Saquon go was the right move in spite of his production and contract is beyond me. There are some players who can’t be reduced to their position. There’s always exceptions to rules; if you can’t see that by now………
We shouldn’t pay for runningbacks. We should overpay for mediocre quarterbacks instead.
thats not what he's saying.
He's saying if we kept Saquan the Giants would still be a huge pile of ****. How do we know that...the organization has been a huge pile of ****.
Bottom out is not the worse thing here...we have yet to truly bottom out we always find a way to win a few meaningless games that put us out of the range of improving that overpaid mediocre QB you talk about.
We need a roster overhaul and paying Barkley makes little to no sense for where we are at. You say things can change quickly in the NFL...maybe but lets no act like Barkley was also some model of health and longevity here.
He thriving behind an elite offense that is basically scoring the same amount of PPG they have been the last 3-4 years. Its putting a talented player in a system that works for him. It didn't work here
Sorry if I didn't want a sub 4 ypc RB making 14 MM while the rest of the roster is bad. He's avg over 6 yards per carry with Philly the only time he even sniffed 5 ypc was his rookie year.
Yes it sucks to see him playing really well for a rival but what he is doing in Philly would simply not even be closely replicable if he was playing RB for the Giants...not this year not next year.
And just because he's having a great season doesn't mean it made sense to draft him #2 which was one of the worst decisions a franchise can make. You can't build around a RB...this is a great example of that. RB's are valued in a system not a RB makes a system.
I’m agreeing with you! Makes much more sense to let your best playmaker who wants to stay go to your division rival and have an MVP caliber season. Gotcha.
mpharris36 wrote:Synciere wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
thats not what he's saying.
He's saying if we kept Saquan the Giants would still be a huge pile of ****. How do we know that...the organization has been a huge pile of ****.
Bottom out is not the worse thing here...we have yet to truly bottom out we always find a way to win a few meaningless games that put us out of the range of improving that overpaid mediocre QB you talk about.
We need a roster overhaul and paying Barkley makes little to no sense for where we are at. You say things can change quickly in the NFL...maybe but lets no act like Barkley was also some model of health and longevity here.
He thriving behind an elite offense that is basically scoring the same amount of PPG they have been the last 3-4 years. Its putting a talented player in a system that works for him. It didn't work here
Sorry if I didn't want a sub 4 ypc RB making 14 MM while the rest of the roster is bad. He's avg over 6 yards per carry with Philly the only time he even sniffed 5 ypc was his rookie year.
Yes it sucks to see him playing really well for a rival but what he is doing in Philly would simply not even be closely replicable if he was playing RB for the Giants...not this year not next year.
And just because he's having a great season doesn't mean it made sense to draft him #2 which was one of the worst decisions a franchise can make. You can't build around a RB...this is a great example of that. RB's are valued in a system not a RB makes a system.
I’m agreeing with you! Makes much more sense to let your best playmaker who wants to stay go to your division rival and have an MVP caliber season. Gotcha.
umm he didn't want to stay...they offered him a very good extension and he turned it down. Barkley actually ended up leading us to not being able to franchise Daniel Jones by turning down that extension during the year (which was really similar to the contract he got with the eagles).
In theory Barkley made the right decision this offseason. He didn't want to come back to the Giants and he made the right call. He is now having an offensive player of the year type season and he wouldn't be doing that on this team behind this offensive line.
Barkley made the best decision for himself.
mpharris36 wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
nah I'm a results guy. Ultimately we have a Mara issue though because I don't trust him wiping the slate clean and making the right hires.
I tried to give Schoen a benefit of the doubt because he inherited a mess from Gettleman. Terrible cap situation, very limited talent pool, and a non modernized organization (we were using draft books) instead of digital technology draft room! So I appreciate Schoen modernizing the FO...and I roughly agree with his concepts about positional value.
But the team has trended downhill after there 1st season. I think 3 years is enough. I also now have seen 3 draft classes that haven't been impressive to say I'm not interested in seeing a 4th one.
at first, i was satisfied with his drafts because they "aligned" with whatever the consensus mocks had as the best players and all that.
but honestly, fck all that, i need to see our picks starting to win and make real impacts on the field
yeah I mean most draft reports were that the Giants did well in there drafts under Schoen. Most had Neal and Thibs rated highly...but its a results based business...mocks aren't everything you need to see results on the field.