Bernman wrote:"Needs" in order:
1. athletic big
2. ancillary perimeter creator
3. big wing defender/small ball 4
Only 1 may be a need. 2 is a problem that shows when a star is missing, but it's gonna happen ya figure. It's a strong want at least. 3 might be a bonus. They could just try Livingston to contain a strong, athletic wing like Jimmy. Might not trust him in the playoffs.
These are definitely the needs. I go back and forth on the order, mostly due to what playoff lineups could look like, but I think when we take it a step further and look at a cost-benefit analysis, your order probably becomes the right one.
3) For instance, I’d love Eason here, who’d fit point 3, but he either likely isn’t available or we wouldn’t have the assets to acquire him. When we start to do down the list of defensive combo forwards who don’t suck on offense, the list gets really small and every team is after that archetype.
The idea would be they’d be large enough to battle 4’s and quick enough to cover 3’s. This would allow us to hide Khris on the weaker forward option. Player X on Kawhi, Khris on Derrick Jones jr. Player X on Siakam, Khris on Nesmith.
They would also have to be better than Prince, who isn’t good defensively but isn’t awful, either, and he’s been a really productive play finisher for us who doesn’t get tunnel vision. He’s been good, mostly.
Consider someone like Naji Marshall, he’d be pretty expensive to acquire and the gains would be slim.
2) You are absolutely right that our creation issues largely go away when fully healthy. If we were to acquire a player, they’d have to be able to impact the game in other ways to be worth it. They absolutely could not be a player that has to have the ball in their hands to see value.
I’d like to have a guy who could catch and attack on a rotating defense. That’s something we haven’t reliably had since brogdon, but it’s not dire either.
1) This is the one we struggle to approximate the value for currently outside Giannis, and should be the cheapest to acquire. At least a big who can defend, maybe not super athletic. We need a guy who knows where to be and can get there. That’s basically it.
I’m also not sure how much that player would play in the post season, though. There’s matchups where brook is an asset, and he should play 30+ minutes, and there’s matchups where Brook should barely see the court. In the latter scenario, I’d think you’d just go Giannis at the 5.
There are still minutes available but not a ton. If the big is cheap to acquire, that’s fine. If he’s expensive, it gives me pause.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk