Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob
Triple7 wrote:Tatum just got punked by Mitchell. Hitting tough shots, while JT missing layups and 5 footers. **** this!
meatball sub wrote:jrue is too injured to be effective right now. he needs to sit
Triple7 wrote:Tatum just got punked by Mitchell. Hitting tough shots, while JT missing layups and 5 footers. **** this!
NYCelticsfan136 wrote:Dangit wrote:Meh... Two starters out.. Holidays worst game ever.... No need to do the sky is falling stuff here.
They still had a decent lead going to the fourth. That was a terrible fourth quarter. They need another winning streak.
Fierce1 wrote:It was same thing last season every time the Celtics lose.
Even with the loss the Celtics are still 16-4, still better than last season's 15-5.
Credit where credit is due, Mitchell came up big late in the 4th.
But looking at the big picture, the Cavs needed that unbelievable explosion from Mitchell and 2 starters missing for the Celts in order for the Cavs to get the win.
The Corey's wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:The Corey's wrote:
I don't.
He got put into the job a week before training camp lol
Ya I understand. He also got **** embarrassed in the playoffs with his coaching skills.
That team was prime for a title that year. There's no excuse for it and he was the weakest link.
Sweet Serenity wrote:The Corey's wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:
He got put into the job a week before training camp lol
Ya I understand. He also got **** embarrassed in the playoffs with his coaching skills.
That team was prime for a title that year. There's no excuse for it and he was the weakest link.
Okay ?
Have you completely forgotten what happened last season when we went 16-3 ?
Triple7 wrote:Tatum just got punked by Mitchell. Hitting tough shots, while JT missing layups and 5 footers. **** this!
The Corey's wrote:Fierce1 wrote:It was same thing last season every time the Celtics lose.
Even with the loss the Celtics are still 16-4, still better than last season's 15-5.
Credit where credit is due, Mitchell came up big late in the 4th.
But looking at the big picture, the Cavs needed that unbelievable explosion from Mitchell and 2 starters missing for the Celts in order for the Cavs to get the win.
Are you actually going to compare the Celtics game for game vs their record this time a year ago?
What does that prove?
Patsfan1081 wrote:Triple7 wrote:Tatum just got punked by Mitchell. Hitting tough shots, while JT missing layups and 5 footers. **** this!
Mitchell can blow by guys and had Al in front of him. Tatum has Mobley and Allen on the paint. Still horrid iso ball though. Their crunch time play calling is horrid.
Lee Van Cleef wrote:We will beat these guys in a 7-game series, but we need the whole team healthy and Jrue in the 2nd unit.
Parasite wrote:ConstableGeneva wrote:Parasite wrote:Not sure I’ve ever a seen a star player be a worse finisher at the rim more than Tatum
Sadly the numbers disagree.
Yeah I don’t care about the numbers. He misses way too many at the rim in crunch time.
Fierce1 wrote:The Corey's wrote:Fierce1 wrote:It was same thing last season every time the Celtics lose.
Even with the loss the Celtics are still 16-4, still better than last season's 15-5.
Credit where credit is due, Mitchell came up big late in the 4th.
But looking at the big picture, the Cavs needed that unbelievable explosion from Mitchell and 2 starters missing for the Celts in order for the Cavs to get the win.
Are you actually going to compare the Celtics game for game vs their record this time a year ago?
What does that prove?
It proves that there's some improvement compared to last season.
In case you didn't know, Celtics have not yet lost by double digits this season.
Last season the Celts lost by double digits twice after 20 games.
For a championship team, small improvements matter.
The Corey's wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Ya I understand. He also got **** embarrassed in the playoffs with his coaching skills.
That team was prime for a title that year. There's no excuse for it and he was the weakest link.
Okay ?
Have you completely forgotten what happened last season when we went 16-3 ?
I'm confused. So Joe isn't why they lost in 22 but he is the reason they won in 23?
If not, your point is misleading if not completely disingenuous.
Sweet Serenity wrote:The Corey's wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:
Okay ?
Have you completely forgotten what happened last season when we went 16-3 ?
I'm confused. So Joe isn't why they lost in 22 but he is the reason they won in 23?
If not, your point is misleading if not completely disingenuous.
It’s a collective effort dude.
We’re 17-4. Stop overreacting.
The Corey's wrote:Fierce1 wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Are you actually going to compare the Celtics game for game vs their record this time a year ago?
What does that prove?
It proves that there's some improvement compared to last season.
In case you didn't know, Celtics have not yet lost by double digits this season.
Last season the Celts lost by double digits twice after 20 games.
For a championship team, small improvements matter.
It doesn't matter until the playoffs. I don't care if they finish with 25 loses.
NYCelticsfan136 wrote:Sweet Serenity wrote:The Corey's wrote:
I'm confused. So Joe isn't why they lost in 22 but he is the reason they won in 23?
If not, your point is misleading if not completely disingenuous.
It’s a collective effort dude.
We’re 17-4. Stop overreacting.
16-4 not 17-4 yet. They better bounce back tomorrow. I hate losing games like this. We should be on top of the eastern conference and not the cavs.