ImageImageImage

Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/2024

Moderator: ijspeelman

JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 13,287
And1: 8,143
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/2024 

Post#1 » by JujitsuFlip » Sun Dec 1, 2024 2:24 pm

Wade and Strus are out.

Celtics have 4 guys questionable, I personally hope they all sit but we know they will all probably play.

White: he left Friday's game with a foot injury and did not return.

Horford: he has a toe sprain, played 25 minutes off the bench Friday but did not accumulate a lot of stats.

Holiday: he has a sore adductor (whatever that is lol).

KP: this is the first night of a back to back so he will either play tonight or tomorrow at the Heat due to injury management.
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 13,287
And1: 8,143
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#2 » by JujitsuFlip » Sun Dec 1, 2024 9:23 pm

White is out, the other 3 good to go.

Jaylen Brown is a late scratch with an illness.
afarmenian
Analyst
Posts: 3,411
And1: 3,588
Joined: May 02, 2017
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#3 » by afarmenian » Sun Dec 1, 2024 11:55 pm

It just seems like it's impossible for us to beat the Celtics if Tatum and Brown are just going to hunt Garland on defense I mean it's the same thing every single game


we make it close or we get ahead and then they just hunt Garland to get right back into the game we panic start rushing shots bricking threes and then we double team and they find wide open shooters it's just academic for them
afarmenian
Analyst
Posts: 3,411
And1: 3,588
Joined: May 02, 2017
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#4 » by afarmenian » Mon Dec 2, 2024 1:32 am

Great win. Ironic what I said about Tatum forcing it against Garland Finally backfires. Mitchell goes nuclear. They where missing Brown and White but not our best game by any means
User avatar
ijspeelman
Forum Mod - Cavs
Forum Mod - Cavs
Posts: 2,616
And1: 1,210
Joined: Feb 17, 2022
Contact:
   

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#5 » by ijspeelman » Mon Dec 2, 2024 1:38 am

It was nice to comeback against the Celts.

Defense really stepped up down the stretch. We were struggling to get good looks going throughout (and missed some easy ones at the basket), but we got them to go when it mattered (even if Mitchell had to go ballistic for it to happen).
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 13,287
And1: 8,143
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#6 » by JujitsuFlip » Mon Dec 2, 2024 1:52 am

Go Cavs!
User avatar
El Hespiritu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,719
And1: 1,351
Joined: May 24, 2016
Location: Barcelona
Contact:
   

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#7 » by El Hespiritu » Mon Dec 2, 2024 2:10 am

Two currently best NBA teams play each other.
One is bit more short-handed than the other.
Ends up being a tied game.

I feel like it's same script for the game regardless who's the one and who's the other
Image
-I tell them: Gentlemen you desist. Your differences are bussiness of your own. We all must care this Refuge's harmony and decorum
-What if they don't listen?
-I kill them and throw them into the sea
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,139
And1: 35,352
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#8 » by jbk1234 » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:03 am

afarmenian wrote:Great win. Ironic what I said about Tatum forcing it against Garland Finally backfires. Mitchell goes nuclear. They where missing Brown and White but not our best game by any means


We stopped overhelping.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,930
And1: 4,926
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#9 » by JonFromVA » Mon Dec 2, 2024 7:34 am

afarmenian wrote:Great win. Ironic what I said about Tatum forcing it against Garland Finally backfires. Mitchell goes nuclear. They where missing Brown and White but not our best game by any means


Yep, Tatum isn't always efficient and getting Boston's offense bogged down running 2pt ISO's is a viable strategy if we can run our offense. My biggest concern is with the wear and tear on Garland.

I'd still like to see both teams at full strength, but that's not a likely reality.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,930
And1: 4,926
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#10 » by JonFromVA » Mon Dec 2, 2024 7:40 am

jbk1234 wrote:
afarmenian wrote:Great win. Ironic what I said about Tatum forcing it against Garland Finally backfires. Mitchell goes nuclear. They where missing Brown and White but not our best game by any means


We stopped overhelping.


We need to learn how to not switch so easily and predictably. That was something the Warriors worked on.
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,940
And1: 2,381
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#11 » by toooskies » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:00 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
afarmenian wrote:Great win. Ironic what I said about Tatum forcing it against Garland Finally backfires. Mitchell goes nuclear. They where missing Brown and White but not our best game by any means


We stopped overhelping.


We need to learn how to not switch so easily and predictably. That was something the Warriors worked on.

Garland on Tatum was actually a beneficial switch for us. Tatum's best/only offensive move on drives is to extend his elbow into his defender to create space, but he can't do that with Garland because it doesn't generate leverage and he might hit him in the head. Tatum's best strategy against Garland is to shoot over him, and while sometimes that works, I'll take long 2s from any player any day.

Brown's got more explosiveness to the hoop and he will be much better on those targeted switches.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,930
And1: 4,926
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#12 » by JonFromVA » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:38 pm

toooskies wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
We stopped overhelping.


We need to learn how to not switch so easily and predictably. That was something the Warriors worked on.

Garland on Tatum was actually a beneficial switch for us. Tatum's best/only offensive move on drives is to extend his elbow into his defender to create space, but he can't do that with Garland because it doesn't generate leverage and he might hit him in the head. Tatum's best strategy against Garland is to shoot over him, and while sometimes that works, I'll take long 2s from any player any day.

Brown's got more explosiveness to the hoop and he will be much better on those targeted switches.


I tried counting the Tatum on Garland ISO's in the 2nd half of the game via nba.com live box score and I've got him at 11 pts on 7 shots (5 of 7 with a 3pter).

If he was in Boston and getting a friendly whistle it would be worse.

Meanwhile Mitchell had something like 30 pts on 12 shots in the second half!!!

We can do better than Garland on Tatum - I'd prefer Wade, Okoro, or Mobley). Making sure Mitchell and/or Garland can finish games strong is part of our strategy and wearing down either players by making them defend is beneficial to Boston as would be some "inadvertent" elbows to the face.
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 13,287
And1: 8,143
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#13 » by JujitsuFlip » Mon Dec 2, 2024 4:19 pm

en fuegoImage
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,940
And1: 2,381
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#14 » by toooskies » Mon Dec 2, 2024 5:01 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
toooskies wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
We need to learn how to not switch so easily and predictably. That was something the Warriors worked on.

Garland on Tatum was actually a beneficial switch for us. Tatum's best/only offensive move on drives is to extend his elbow into his defender to create space, but he can't do that with Garland because it doesn't generate leverage and he might hit him in the head. Tatum's best strategy against Garland is to shoot over him, and while sometimes that works, I'll take long 2s from any player any day.

Brown's got more explosiveness to the hoop and he will be much better on those targeted switches.


I tried counting the Tatum on Garland ISO's in the 2nd half of the game via nba.com live box score and I've got him at 11 pts on 7 shots (5 of 7 with a 3pter).

If he was in Boston and getting a friendly whistle it would be worse.

Meanwhile Mitchell had something like 30 pts on 12 shots in the second half!!!

We can do better than Garland on Tatum - I'd prefer Wade, Okoro, or Mobley). Making sure Mitchell and/or Garland can finish games strong is part of our strategy and wearing down either players by making them defend is beneficial to Boston as would be some "inadvertent" elbows to the face.

Switching keeps Tatum from driving immediately off the screen, which is what starts Boston's offensive play. Making Tatum try to bully Garland takes a bunch more time off the clock. The thing Boston does that kills you is the kick-swing-swing-open-3, and that simply doesn't happen when Tatum tries to be Kobe over Garland.

I'll let Tatum shoot 40-60% on twos all day, with short rebounds we're nearly guaranteed to grab, rather than enable the whole Boston team get open 3s. Sometimes he'll shoot perfectly for a quarter (like the 3rd last night), sometimes he'll struggle (2 for 7 in the 4th).
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,930
And1: 4,926
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Game 21: Celtics @ Cavs 12/1/24 

Post#15 » by JonFromVA » Mon Dec 2, 2024 7:11 pm

toooskies wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
toooskies wrote:Garland on Tatum was actually a beneficial switch for us. Tatum's best/only offensive move on drives is to extend his elbow into his defender to create space, but he can't do that with Garland because it doesn't generate leverage and he might hit him in the head. Tatum's best strategy against Garland is to shoot over him, and while sometimes that works, I'll take long 2s from any player any day.

Brown's got more explosiveness to the hoop and he will be much better on those targeted switches.


I tried counting the Tatum on Garland ISO's in the 2nd half of the game via nba.com live box score and I've got him at 11 pts on 7 shots (5 of 7 with a 3pter).

If he was in Boston and getting a friendly whistle it would be worse.

Meanwhile Mitchell had something like 30 pts on 12 shots in the second half!!!

We can do better than Garland on Tatum - I'd prefer Wade, Okoro, or Mobley). Making sure Mitchell and/or Garland can finish games strong is part of our strategy and wearing down either players by making them defend is beneficial to Boston as would be some "inadvertent" elbows to the face.

Switching keeps Tatum from driving immediately off the screen, which is what starts Boston's offensive play. Making Tatum try to bully Garland takes a bunch more time off the clock. The thing Boston does that kills you is the kick-swing-swing-open-3, and that simply doesn't happen when Tatum tries to be Kobe over Garland.

I'll let Tatum shoot 40-60% on twos all day, with short rebounds we're nearly guaranteed to grab, rather than enable the whole Boston team get open 3s. Sometimes he'll shoot perfectly for a quarter (like the 3rd last night), sometimes he'll struggle (2 for 7 in the 4th).


Leaving shooters wide open in the short corner is something else we need to work on ...

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers