ImageImageImageImageImage

What defines a first option?

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

Rawahl
Ballboy
Posts: 40
And1: 30
Joined: Jan 31, 2022

What defines a first option? 

Post#1 » by Rawahl » Mon Dec 2, 2024 7:34 am

Hi all,

there is a lot of talk about the players we have and their potential as a 1a option for the team. What defines being a first option in your eyes?
disoblige
Head Coach
Posts: 7,252
And1: 1,239
Joined: Oct 19, 2006
 

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#2 » by disoblige » Mon Dec 2, 2024 7:36 am

Being unstoppable, reliable, and highly efficient—like Jordan, Shaq, LeBron, Kawhi, Durant and Curry. These players consistently deliver under pressure and are the go-to leaders when it matters most.
User avatar
LoveMyRaps
RealGM
Posts: 28,213
And1: 48,654
Joined: Jun 10, 2013
       

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#3 » by LoveMyRaps » Mon Dec 2, 2024 10:11 am

disoblige wrote:Being unstoppable, reliable, and highly efficient—like Jordan, Shaq, LeBron, Kawhi, Durant and Curry. These players consistently deliver under pressure and are the go-to leaders when it matters most.


You just described a superstar, w/ the "unstoppable" label.

A first option doesn't always have to be an unstoppable, just efficient & reliable (as you said).

My simple description of a first option is someone who can effectively & efficiently create for himself and his teammates (even if it means attracting double teams and being able to make the right pass).
In Masai We Trust :meditate:
Image
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,388
And1: 25,370
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#4 » by HumbleRen » Mon Dec 2, 2024 11:25 am

Someone who can consistently create something out of nothing when a play breaks down and also have the ability to bend defences whenever they’re on the court.
Rawahl
Ballboy
Posts: 40
And1: 30
Joined: Jan 31, 2022

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#5 » by Rawahl » Mon Dec 2, 2024 1:45 pm

HumbleRen wrote:Someone who can consistently create something out of nothing when a play breaks down and also have the ability to bend defences whenever they’re on the court.


I take this a exemplary, because at this point there have been only some very vague descriptions. I would like to find some criteria that are a little bit more measurable. So there are various aspects of the game, as there are roles.
Is the number option always the goto guy?
Is it the guy with the best creation tools?
Is it the 3-level scorer?

How can I identify a first option in a team and how can I compare a player to what we can define a "standard" for first options, so to tell if the player is a good first option or not.

Perhaps it would also help to name a few good first options and to define, why they are good first options.
Raptorfan2012
Head Coach
Posts: 7,016
And1: 4,877
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#6 » by Raptorfan2012 » Mon Dec 2, 2024 1:56 pm

disoblige wrote:Being unstoppable, reliable, and highly efficient—like Jordan, Shaq, LeBron, Kawhi, Durant and Curry. These players consistently deliver under pressure and are the go-to leaders when it matters most.


Some bad news for Tank-Nation then. I don't see Flagg as a first-option player. Only possible elite first-option player in this draft so far is probably Ace Bailey. I don't think Dylan Harper is athletic enough to do the things he does in the NBA. Some good young talent, but I don't see any of these prospects as the Jordan/Lebron type.
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,010
And1: 17,807
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#7 » by Jstock12 » Mon Dec 2, 2024 2:03 pm

Raptorfan2012 wrote:
disoblige wrote:Being unstoppable, reliable, and highly efficient—like Jordan, Shaq, LeBron, Kawhi, Durant and Curry. These players consistently deliver under pressure and are the go-to leaders when it matters most.


Some bad news for Tank-Nation then. I don't see Flagg as a first-option player.

Agree. I've heard Vecenie talk about Flagg as a Franz Wagner 2.0 but with a higher defensive ceiling - that would still make him a 2nd option. Although I personally don't think that Flagg will ever be better than Wagner offensively.
manjusaka
Pro Prospect
Posts: 876
And1: 582
Joined: Oct 25, 2017
   

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#8 » by manjusaka » Mon Dec 2, 2024 2:22 pm

Rawahl wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:Someone who can consistently create something out of nothing when a play breaks down and also have the ability to bend defences whenever they’re on the court.


I take this a exemplary, because at this point there have been only some very vague descriptions. I would like to find some criteria that are a little bit more measurable. So there are various aspects of the game, as there are roles.
Is the number option always the goto guy?
Is it the guy with the best creation tools?
Is it the 3-level scorer?

How can I identify a first option in a team and how can I compare a player to what we can define a "standard" for first options, so to tell if the player is a good first option or not.

Perhaps it would also help to name a few good first options and to define, why they are good first options.


Melo didn’t have a 3, but was a lethal scorer. Shaq dominated the paint. Traditionally go to scorer doesn’t have to be 3 lvl scorer, Giannis can’t shoot too.

A guy who can rip apart the opponent defensive scheme without a proper set play or with his isolation ability. Teammates would just space the floor and dump the ball to him, and he will score.
anotherhomer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,879
And1: 3,484
Joined: Jun 23, 2008

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#9 » by anotherhomer » Mon Dec 2, 2024 2:34 pm

someone who can consistently drive your offense esp during clutch time and win you games

kawhi was that....derozan was that during the regular season
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,719
And1: 3,623
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#10 » by Indeed » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:12 pm

There maybe many definition of first option, but perhaps our need for first option is more someone who can generate good scoring chance at clutch time or down the shot clock against a tight defense.
Does he has to score or setup first? Maybe not, but he is reliable that he can generate good looks for himself or teammates down the line.

Sometimes they may get shutdown by opposing defense, so some teams may have a good second option who can also generate good scoring chance with less of the first option.
RaptorLakerJay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 780
And1: 508
Joined: Jun 25, 2012

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#11 » by RaptorLakerJay » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:22 pm

When the team goes dry, you can just feed the ball to him and he'll get you a bucket. (Think Kawhi)
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,772
And1: 2,145
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#12 » by Shakril » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:22 pm

2 things define the #1 option:

1. As the name suggest, the first guy you try to set up to score, if the opponent takes that away, you go to the #2 and so on. Essentially the core of the offense.

2. Reliability, you know that guy delivers, be it by scoring or setting other players up to score. At the end of the game, when you need a bucket, thats the guy that through whom the offense goes. Does not mean he is the closer, it just means, he is the guy you rely on the most.

In both cases, the #1 option has to be so good, that the other team does everything they can, to make him give the ball up, but the #1 guy still manages to come through.

Thats why Shaq & Kobe where so lethal, cause both were #1s at the same time, so you had to pick your poison of whom you rather want to kill you.
User avatar
HiJiNX
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,873
And1: 14,720
Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Location: T-Dot

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#13 » by HiJiNX » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:23 pm

Someone who can consistently create advantages for themselves or their team.

Matchup proof.

Is reliable in the clutch.

Shows up against the best competition.

Not scared.

Can impose their will to create buckets (doesn’t have to be the one scoring) late in the game.
not strong, only aggresive cuz the power ain't directed/ that's why, we are subjected to the will of the oppressive
RaptorLakerJay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 780
And1: 508
Joined: Jun 25, 2012

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#14 » by RaptorLakerJay » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:27 pm

HiJiNX wrote:Someone who can consistently create advantages for themselves or their team.

Matchup proof.

Is reliable in the clutch.

Shows up against the best competition.

Not scared.

Can impose their will to create buckets (doesn’t have to be the one scoring) late in the game.


I think there are three things you mentioned there which would rather be defining of a superstar: reliable in the clutch, shows up against best competition, and not scared.

I think first option here would be the impose will to create buckets, and consistently create advantages for themselves/team.
manjusaka
Pro Prospect
Posts: 876
And1: 582
Joined: Oct 25, 2017
   

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#15 » by manjusaka » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:37 pm

RaptorLakerJay wrote:
HiJiNX wrote:Someone who can consistently create advantages for themselves or their team.

Matchup proof.

Is reliable in the clutch.

Shows up against the best competition.

Not scared.

Can impose their will to create buckets (doesn’t have to be the one scoring) late in the game.


I think there are three things you mentioned there which would rather be defining of a superstar: reliable in the clutch, shows up against best competition, and not scared.

I think first option here would be the impose will to create buckets, and consistently create advantages for themselves/team.


Joe Johnson wasn’t a superstar but was first option for the Hawks. Would you consider Bosh and DDR as superstar when they were playing for us? They were first option.
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,817
And1: 3,774
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#16 » by brownbobcat » Mon Dec 2, 2024 3:52 pm

manjusaka wrote:
RaptorLakerJay wrote:
HiJiNX wrote:Someone who can consistently create advantages for themselves or their team.

Matchup proof.

Is reliable in the clutch.

Shows up against the best competition.

Not scared.

Can impose their will to create buckets (doesn’t have to be the one scoring) late in the game.


I think there are three things you mentioned there which would rather be defining of a superstar: reliable in the clutch, shows up against best competition, and not scared.

I think first option here would be the impose will to create buckets, and consistently create advantages for themselves/team.


Joe Johnson wasn’t a superstar but was first option for the Hawks. Would you consider Bosh and DDR as superstar when they were playing for us? They were first option.

It's all relative of course, but a 1st option is generally a guy who can create his own shot effectively and at a high shot volume. This allows other guys to get their shots up against lessened defensive intensity, kickouts, spacing, etc. I'd say that describes Joe Johnson, but obviously he couldn't do it at a high enough level to make Atlanta a title contender, but they were a decent team.
AbC?
Head Coach
Posts: 6,624
And1: 10,645
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: Toronto
 

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#17 » by AbC? » Mon Dec 2, 2024 4:16 pm

What most people have said:
- can consistently self-create advantage against halfcourt defenses, and leverages that to score efficiently, draw fouls or create open looks for teammates

And even amongst guys I would consider #1 options there is a massive gap between the low end ones and the ones who can actually win you a championship - like going from Trae Young to Jokic.
Image
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,415
And1: 25,608
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#18 » by ItsDanger » Mon Dec 2, 2024 4:17 pm

Somebody that can score 1 on 1. There are exceptions of course (eg. elite non C&S shooting like a Curry for example).
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 29,813
And1: 32,617
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#19 » by YogurtProducer » Mon Dec 2, 2024 4:21 pm

AbC? wrote:What most people have said:
- can consistently self-create advantage against halfcourt defenses, and leverages that to score efficiently, draw fouls or create open looks for teammates

And even amongst guys I would consider #1 options there is a massive gap between the low end ones and the ones who can actually win you a championship - like going from Trae Young to Jokic.

Trae Young is more-so due to his defence.

Trae Young with like Marcus Smart defence is a MVP caliber guy
What an absolute failure and disaster this franchise is, ran by one of the most incompetent front offices in the league.
- Raptors RealGM Forum re: Masai Ujiri - June 2023
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,222
And1: 31,807
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: What defines a first option? 

Post#20 » by tsherkin » Mon Dec 2, 2024 4:26 pm

Are we talking about what is a first option on any given team, or what SHOULD be?

Because teams ultimately mostly have a guy they go to. They lean into their higher-volume guys. It's typically someone who can handle above the arc a little, attack from PnR and get a look, even if it's a 3 or whatever. What is the focal point of each possession? Is it stalling until Player A gets free around some screens? Is it Player B pounding the rock and attacking from PnR, supporting a given level of shooting volume? Is it Player C, who is a primary playmaker who uses his own scoring as a pressure release? Player D who balances playmaking and shooting volume as an on-ball guy?

Ultimately, "first option" is a generic term referring to the focal point of the offense. After that, you start establishing whether or not it is a GOOD thing that said player is in that role.

A given floor of scoring volume coupled to good efficiency, and then hopefully at least reasonable vision/passing ability would be a good start. But then you start looking at team objective, right? A team with a title in mind will have MUCH more stringent parameters on what counts as a good first option than one merely attempting to make the playoffs.

Some of the stuff ITT like "creates advantages for teammates" and such are good examples of what quality first options can do, absolutely.

Return to Toronto Raptors