To Min: Brandon Ingram
To NO: Julius Randle+ a lotto protected 1st.
Reasons: Min gets more spacing and Pelicans get a Zion replacement.
Min-NO
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Min-NO
-
JRoy
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,555
- And1: 13,916
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Min-NO
2588david2588 wrote:To Min: Brandon Ingram
To NO: Julius Randle+ a lotto protected 1st.
Reasons: Min gets more spacing and Pelicans get a Zion replacement.
No way MN is including FRP.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Min-NO
-
Godaddycurse
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,960
- And1: 13,891
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Min-NO
2588david2588 wrote:To Min: Brandon Ingram
To NO: Julius Randle+ a lotto protected 1st.
Reasons: Min gets more spacing and Pelicans get a Zion replacement.
Ingram makes more than Randle so this is nigh impossible as a 2 team trade
Re: Min-NO
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,057
- And1: 5,694
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: Min-NO
Even if there was a way to make this trade legal, the Wolves pass. BI would want too much money next year, and we cannot pay it. Any Randle trade has to be for a player or players with multi years of control.
Re: Min-NO
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,756
- And1: 22,334
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Min-NO
Didn't we just have one of these a few days ago, which was immediately locked because second apron penalties make it dead on arrival?!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Trades and Transactions