Ferry Avenue wrote:76ciology wrote:That’s why having an alpha on the team is crucial. Jimmy and James were the closest we’ve had—George isn’t and Maxey could be that but not right now.
But can we wait for Maxey to take that step? Maybe Embiid’s knee would already be grinding bone on bone when that happens.
It feels like Embiid has a “little brother” personality, and you see it when he’s around players like James or Jimmy. He thrives when there’s a stronger, more assertive personality to take charge.
An alpha changes everything. Without Embiid, the alpha can lead the team and maximize the depth we have. With Embiid, the alpha can lead the team, utilizing both Embiid’s talent and the team’s depth to win. It provides a structure that works with or without him on the floor.
Again, been saying all that for years, and no, Harden isn't one either. He gives the illusion of it because he plays point guard and runs the show on the court, but nobody who crumbles in the face of adversity in high stakes games as often as he does is an alpha. And I said that here just as soon as he was acquired. He wasn't the solution for the "Embiid problem" noted above, and Paul George isn't either.
When you get to the level of the second round of the playoffs and beyond, this stuff becomes far less about "adding pieces that fit [physically speaking] around Embiid" (Harden, George) and far more about team leadership and the kinds of emotional dynamics noted above. That's what distinguishes teams at that level of play, because all of them at that point have the "necessary pieces that fit." The physical talent across teams at that level is relatively equal, and the ones with the best team dynamics of the kind noted above win.
And this is of course why the Sixers can never get past that point in the playoffs -- they have the necessary
physical talent to compete at that level, but not the necessary leadership and emotional dynamics to
win at that level. They simply get beaten by teams with better player leadership every year. The closest they came to overcoming that during the Embiid era was when they actually DID have the leadership -- the Jimmy Butler year. That's no coincidence.
True, I think we’re on the same page but viewing it from different angles. Jimmy’s alpha mentality is on a completely different level compared to Harden’s. That said, Harden’s alpha level is still effective enough to win regular-season games, giving Embiid the rest he needs (just look at how he’s carrying the Clippers right now or his performance in Game 1 against the Celtics). However, Harden isn’t the type to elevate a team to a championship level, and he knows it—that’s why you see his “quit” energy in so many key games. On the other hand, Jimmy operates on a whole different plane; he genuinely believes he’s the best player in the league and can carry a team of G League players to the Finals. But even he has limitations, as we’ve seen with his underwhelming performances in the Finals.
You play this game long enough, and you start to understand your limitations. You know when to grind it out and when to conserve your energy. Especially for these multi-millionaire athletes, where the joy of owning a mansion or living a luxury lifestyle can have the same feeling of winning a championship.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.