phincsfan wrote:I really don't think the euro stash thing works. And I'm not just using Yam and JB as examples. I think for the most part they don't really pan out in the NBA. And for this Celtics roster, building the bench up is paramount. The core of the team (JT, JB and White) are all paid and still young. I'd rather go the G-League route with an overseas player but IMO, most of the 2nd rounders would rather be stashed overseas and get paid more than lets say an Anton Watson deal. Get targets for the system which we know shooting is important. Stashing them takes away the ability to get them in the system and work on what they want them to work and how they want them to work on it. It's like a machine.
This years draft in the 2nd rd will have a bunch of babies (age wise)compared to Rico and Anton. Plus there will be a few Euro's who are playing in college so IMO those guys are already settled in the states (Krivas and the Ivisic brothers). A quick look it seems the average age of mocked 2nd rounders is 21/22).
I posted earlier that unless a major target slips to the C's slot, I would trade back in the 2nd for another 2nd and a future 1st. Great scenario would be Charlotte's 2nd, possibly their rights to Denver's 2nd and the rights to their Dallas 2027 1st which is protected for 1 and 2. Charlotte is gonna have to fill roster slots next year especially since Grant is out. Rico obviously was a target that dropped and Stevens had no problem locking him up to that rookie deal. I'd rather a target than a reach in the 1st. A reach in the 2nd is fine because of the contract and control they will have won't be bad to the cap. And you never know, any 2nd rounder could turn out to be that guy who just needed the right NBA system to thrive.
Having three 2nds in this draft would be nice and it increases the odds of hitting on at least one to become a contributor during the J's window. I'd rather all three be in Maine developing with maybe one becoming a piece to replace a Springer and/or XMan. Not necessarily position wise just contributing wise.
Walsh is looking like he's gonna be a hit. Neems made up for the Begarin pick since they both were drafted in 21'. Peterson WILL be a hit. I've been on his bandwagon for a while. Rico's real chance will be next season. Watson may have a chance next year. But adding three more prospects increases those odds of hitting.
The kid Tyrese Proctor was mentioned before and I think a 2nd on him would be interesting. Steven's respects Duke, he has real good size, good shooter and a PG. Something I'd like to see Boston get in the system.
Nikola Jokic, Larry Bird, David Robinson, Manu Ginobili, Marc Gasol, Bojan Bogdanovic, Bogdan Bogdanovic,... I'm sure there are many more examples I'm forgetting.
Besides, the point of a draft and stash isn't necessarily that you get a potential future contributor with the guy you pick it's that because you keep open a roster spot, you get to try out two prospects essentially. If the Celtics don't draft Begarin but go for a player they need to roster immediately, they don't have a two way deal left to offer to Sam Hauser and he's probably raining threes for the Heat right now.
So if you want the Celtics to get a bunch of prospects to increase their probability of hitting on one, draft and stash is actually the way to go.
Tatum, Brown, White, Porzingis, Holiday, Pritchard, Scheierman, Queta, Tillman and Walsh are all under contract next season. There's every reason to believe that Horford and Kornet will be back too. Davison and Springer will be restricted free agents but even if they don't bring them back, since you believe that Peterson is a hit and they'll keep him around that's 13 rosters spots accounted for. 14 realistically since I have a hard time seeing them cutting Watson loose after a season consiering how patient they have been with their two way guys in recent years. As currently constructed, I just don't see how the Celtics can have room for three draft picks this summer.













