It just saps my enjoyment of this board much

Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
I'm over the debate and appreciate your knowledge and insights beyond a dispute over grammar. I think you're right according to your way of thinking about positions and I'll chalk the differences up to grammar.Knightro wrote:People not accepting basic facts that can easily be looked up and confirmed as true makes me not even want to post anymore.
It just saps my enjoyment of this board much
eyriq wrote:Knightro wrote:We don’t need to really rehash what Black was asked to do last year. I’m right and you’re wrong. The numbers back me up entirely.
Say WHAT??? LOL
That debate is conclusively over and if you lookup the position he played last season you'll see a big old POINT GUARD written out in plain letters.
Position <> Role
Nah, he's clearly better this year, statistically speaking.pepe1991 wrote:I think it is troublesome that he looked better last year when he didn't play PG at all, than this year when he is given some backup PG duties.
He is having pretty bad season from offensive POV.
And there is no reason to continue to engage into "was he PG as a rookie". He wasn't. There is nothing to be said to change it. Can't rewrite past, it's over.
eyriq wrote:I'm over the debate and appreciate your knowledge and insights beyond a dispute over grammar. I think you're right according to your way of thinking about positions and I'll chalk the differences up to grammar.Knightro wrote:People not accepting basic facts that can easily be looked up and confirmed as true makes me not even want to post anymore.
It just saps my enjoyment of this board much
JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I'm over the debate and appreciate your knowledge and insights beyond a dispute over grammar. I think you're right according to your way of thinking about positions and I'll chalk the differences up to grammar.Knightro wrote:People not accepting basic facts that can easily be looked up and confirmed as true makes me not even want to post anymore.
It just saps my enjoyment of this board much
My AI translated the conversations as "bury the hatchet, get back to rooting for Magic basketball."
Keeping it on task. AB is fine. Its why when everyone called to start him I said I was OK with it but the moment he has a series of poor games you have to keep your stock.
Here we are, people are already trying to sell.
Knightro wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I'm over the debate and appreciate your knowledge and insights beyond a dispute over grammar. I think you're right according to your way of thinking about positions and I'll chalk the differences up to grammar.
My AI translated the conversations as "bury the hatchet, get back to rooting for Magic basketball."
Keeping it on task. AB is fine. Its why when everyone called to start him I said I was OK with it but the moment he has a series of poor games you have to keep your stock.
Here we are, people are already trying to sell.
I have zero desire to get rid of Anthony Black. I wish he had played more on the ball last year and I'm glad he's on the ball this year, young player struggles be damned.
Knightro wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I'm over the debate and appreciate your knowledge and insights beyond a dispute over grammar. I think you're right according to your way of thinking about positions and I'll chalk the differences up to grammar.
My AI translated the conversations as "bury the hatchet, get back to rooting for Magic basketball."
Keeping it on task. AB is fine. Its why when everyone called to start him I said I was OK with it but the moment he has a series of poor games you have to keep your stock.
Here we are, people are already trying to sell.
I have zero desire to get rid of Anthony Black. I wish he had played more on the ball last year and I'm glad he's on the ball this year, young player struggles be damned.