shrink wrote:TimberKat wrote:Mattya wrote:2. This trade saves Glen 5 million this year and 11 million next year in salary alone as a tax paying team. That is 30 million in savings for just the next 2 years. That isn’t even counting that they got Gobert to take a pay cut and saved another 18 million including tax next season. That’s roughly 20 million in salary they dropped. For someone who doesn’t like childish games you sure make a lot of “I’m rubber and your glue” arguments. When instead you could have actually read why we wouldn’t have options from 3rd teams to drop that salary unless it was for even worse contracts.
If those numbers are correct, that is the smoking gun on why Taylor or ARod wanted the trade.
Don’t be spoiled hypocrites. If you have been fairly watching Taylor’s bank account, then show me your posts last year where you PRAISED Taylor for agreeing to deals that ADDED so much payroll to be the #2 highest in the NBA!
In fact, the only reason these decreases in payroll are this big is because Taylor paid so much in payroll in the first place, putting us so far in the luxury tax, and it’s higher multipliers. And that’s not even talking about the functionality gains for the team if we get under an apron or two.
Childish? I’m hearing Veruca Salt.
You want people to praise Taylor for being convinced by a new ownership and GM to do moves that cost him more money that led to the best team success in 20 years, in which immediately following said success removes Lore and ARod from ownership decisions, now has the team cutting salary this year and drastically next year, leading to a team struggling in the playoffs race? Please don’t even bring up getting under an apron or 2, because that just solidifies that this team would be dropping a significant amount of salary and players to be able to just aggregate players remaining into trades. At least we can move on from others claiming this wasn’t a cost cutting move,









