NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism

Moderators: bwgood77, Domejandro

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 114,791
And1: 313
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:47 am

Adam Silver has confirmed the NBA is studying the increase of three-pointers and whether it is aversely impacting the league. The Boston Celtics are averaging 51.1 three-point attempts per game, which will easily break the record of most in a season if they continue that trend.  


"The answer is yes, [we are having] many discussions about the style of basketball [being played]," Silver told a small group of reporters Tuesday night before the championship game of the league's second annual NBA Cup between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Milwaukee Bucks. "I would not reduce it to a so-called three point shooting issue. I think we look more holistically at the skill level on the floor, the diversity of offense, the fan reception to the game, all of the above.


"I think the game is in a great place. I love watching the games and I think we have some of the most skilled athletes in the world competing and it's unfair, I think, to the players to lump them into categories as 3-point shooters or a mid range shooter or big man playing under the basket. It's an amazing game.


"Having said that, we're constantly having discussions about whether there are ways to improve stylistically the game on the floor."


Silver said moving the three-point line is unlikely to happen anytime soon.


"Historically, at times, we've moved the 3-point line," Silver said. "I don't think that's a solution here because then, I think when we look at both the game and the data, I think that may not necessarily do more mid-range jumpers, if that's what people want, but more clogging under the basket.


"Whether there's some tweaks we should make, and my sense is I do think we should take seriously this notion of more diversity in offense. I watch as many games as all of you do, and to the extent that it's not so much a three point issue, but that some of the audience, some of the offenses start to look sort of cookie cutter and teams are copying each other. I think that's something we should pay attention to."

Via Tim Bontemps/ESPN

njknicks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 942
And1: 124
Joined: Sep 07, 2017

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#2 » by njknicks » Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:38 am

Have been a life long NBA fan - but the current play has been a turnoff.
No offensive creativity other than spreading the court for threes.
On top of that defensive intensity is penalized.

Suggestions :

* move the three point line further back ( its too easy of a shot now, preferred over a layup ) - make it challenging to shoot long range ( which would make it more electrifying instead of boring to watch )

* allow players to defend ( offensive players get away with everything in today's game )

* Call the carrying violations & travels ( 3 jab steps to take a three is a travel )
Velocity7777
Ballboy
Posts: 9
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 06, 2015

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#3 » by Velocity7777 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:43 am

I know this would never happen because it messes up the entire history of the NBA for comparison sakes and basketball in general, but I have given a lot of thought to the problem basketball in general has with team jacking three's over and over and over.

I feel the true issue is that with how good shooters have become, the ratio of 3 versus 2 at a 1.5 value for every three pointer made is too valuable for teams and shooters to pass up. I feel a better balance would be to make three pointers worth 4 and 2 pointers worth 3. Then the ratio is 1.3 to 1 and teams could win by going inside if the made percentage was high enough and the 4 pt line was well defended. It could open up lots of new potential play styles. And to keep the game time relatively the same, foul shots would be 1 shot make or miss for a normal
Three point bucket, and two shots worth two points each on a fouled 4 point shot. And one shots would still be worth a 1 point free throw. Ok go ahead and tell me im crazy i expect it lol.
Dan_Richter
Ballboy
Posts: 1
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 01, 2024
       

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#4 » by Dan_Richter » Wed Dec 18, 2024 7:51 am

njknicks wrote:Have been a life long NBA fan - but the current play has been a turnoff.
No offensive creativity other than spreading the court for threes.
On top of that defensive intensity is penalized.

Suggestions :

* move the three point line further back ( its too easy of a shot now, preferred over a layup ) - make it challenging to shoot long range ( which would make it more electrifying instead of boring to watch )

* allow players to defend ( offensive players get away with everything in today's game )

* Call the carrying violations & travels ( 3 jab steps to take a three is a travel )


it would be nice if they "returned" these three mentioned things, but that won't happen, because that would make Silver and his "working team" have to admit their mistakes, and they won't do that :D

so I think that given the way Silver thinks and what "nonsense" he has already introduced in the NBA, it could be really possible to create 4p line (I guess somewhere aroung so called logo shot)

basically, Mr. Silver will keep on what he promises with reducing 3P shooting, because the players will really stop shooting 3 points as much, because everyone will be focusing on the shooting 4 points instead :D :D

and because a lot of shots will be missed, logically the rest of the game will happen under the rim on rebounds :wink:

And because this way the game would "stretch" over the entire half-court (if not the full), so basically there will be no need to somehow solve the fact that there is no defense, because then the players will be quite tired, as they run from one baskets to the other, or from one bounced ball to another

so who knows, maybe after the time, the game will change on the 4p boring contest with logo and half court shots with the breathless and sweaty players , of course still without physical defenses and everything, what made NBA so cool in period 1985-2010 :D
Life is one neverending struggle in the dark, so never trust to anyone...never lose your Faith...keep always positive mind, because where is Hope, there is Life, amen 8-) :nod:
NE_pops
Ballboy
Posts: 23
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 21, 2024

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#5 » by NE_pops » Wed Dec 18, 2024 1:12 pm

Stop rewarding foul baiting and flopping. Eliminate the help side charge call. None of these are basketball plays.

Basketball was not better when you could hold and grab - don't believe me? watch a WNBA game where that sort of play is allowed, It stinks. The three point line is fine. I think people just like something to complain about.
xchange55
Senior
Posts: 727
And1: 645
Joined: May 25, 2016
         

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#6 » by xchange55 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:54 pm

njknicks wrote:Have been a life long NBA fan - but the current play has been a turnoff.
No offensive creativity other than spreading the court for threes.


I would agree that 3 point fest type games are a turnoff, where team A dribbles the ball up and chucks, team B dribbles the ball up and chucks, and this goes on a few times. But it's not so bad when the ball is rotating around, especially with drives and kick outs. You still have players like KD/Ant/Bulter that play the mid range game too.

Now the lack of creativity got me thinking about old school basketball. The forumula that every team wanted to follow was draft a 7 footer + with skill. I say "wanted" because there weren't enough skilled big men for every team. Just dump the ball into the big man and let him do his work - is it really more creative? I think that's high debatable.

The biggest positive I see with the current game is anyone who is 6'0" to 7'7" and has skill can succeed in the game. In the older days if you were 6'0" to 6'2" you had to be extremely skilled to have a shot at the league. Win without an elite center to me is more interesting. But winning just because you have the more talented big... meh.
The Beam King
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,749
And1: 774
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
 

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#7 » by The Beam King » Wed Dec 18, 2024 5:28 pm

njknicks wrote:Have been a life long NBA fan - but the current play has been a turnoff.
No offensive creativity other than spreading the court for threes.
On top of that defensive intensity is penalized.

Suggestions :

* move the three point line further back ( its too easy of a shot now, preferred over a layup ) - make it challenging to shoot long range ( which would make it more electrifying instead of boring to watch )

* allow players to defend ( offensive players get away with everything in today's game )

* Call the carrying violations & travels ( 3 jab steps to take a three is a travel )


I'm with you 100%.

I'd also love to see the three point line extended out to 24 feet and rid the corner three. Have the 3 point line extend on the arc until it runs out of bounds eliminating the corner 3. Which will reduce the # of quality 3s taken and help defenses guard the more valuable shots.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,688
And1: 56,979
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
   

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#8 » by robillionaire » Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:27 pm

I would like to see the corner 3 removed. It’s almost like a layup at this point and shouldn’t be worth 3 points. You can keep the rest of the 3 point line distance where it is, percentages aren’t as high from the top of the key and the wings and without having to guard the corner 3 as much it would be easier for defenses to defend the perimeter. And it would keep a lot of the game the same. Not too drastic of a change like the high scores adding 4 point shots and 3 point dunks and what that does for historic scoring records
jbergman27
Ballboy
Posts: 6
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 18, 2017
         

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#9 » by jbergman27 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 7:52 pm

The NBA has a reffing problem, not a 3 point problem.
When was the last time anyone watched a game where 20% of the fouls were just incidental contact or baited contact?
When was the last time you watched a close game, and couldn't go back and pick the bad call that would have swung it the other way?

It almost never happens. The problem is the style of play, but it is because the game rewards things that are hard to watch.
Flopping should be called MUCH more than it is, and it should count as TWO fouls. Traveling. some players get on a breakaway and dribble the ball 3-4 times between their basket and the opponents' basket. Since when can you push the ball in front of you and take 4 steps? or take 3 steps AFTER the gather step.
How many times have you seen a shooter get a foul call "coughs Embid* where they get a jersey just grazed, or they jump into a man who happened to jump .5 seconds earlier? Ot they just fly at the rim with no measurable contact and just fall and get the call. Its unwatchable.
NOBODY WANTS TO SEE THE REFS. The problem is much more about the broken fragments of the game, not the fact that one team is taking 50 3's a game.
Id rather watch 50 3's than watch game after game after game get decided by which team gets more of the 50 free throws.
User avatar
BarneyGumble
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,057
And1: 2,213
Joined: Sep 06, 2008

Re: NBA Studying Three-Point Shooting Trend Amid Criticism 

Post#10 » by BarneyGumble » Wed Dec 18, 2024 8:41 pm

They could solve a lot of the problems by simply enforcing the universal rules of basketball and also stopping the ridiculous load management of players. The masses have zero sympathy for guys making $20+ million a YEAR to be sitting out multiple games for reasons that would not prevent a single one of us middle class folks from missing work.

Return to Wiretap Discussion