Image ImageImage Image

NBA Trade Thread #11

Moderators: HomoSapien, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, Tommy Udo 6 , coldfish, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson, RedBulls23

Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,359
And1: 2,975
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#361 » by Muzbar » Sat Dec 21, 2024 9:45 pm

sco wrote:Playing with the Den for Zach idea:

Bulls out:Zach, THT in: THJ, Thompson, Saric, DET 1st (lightly protected)
Nuggets out:MPJ, Saric in:Zach, THT
Pistons out: THJ, Thompson, DET 1st (lightly protected) in:MPJ

At least the $ work. MPJ would seem to be a good fit with DET. I don't love Thompson, but doubt we could get Holland instead.

Love the effort sco, but Denver can't receive more money than they send out and LaVine makes more than MPJ and Saric combined (I got the trade to work on fanspo but it failed on spotrac).

Also I'm not sure Detroit would trade Ausar and a FRP for MPJ and they owe their FRP to Minnesota (protected 1-13 in 2025, 1-11 in 2026 and 1-9 in 2027).
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 8,065
And1: 2,398
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#362 » by ChettheJet » Sat Dec 21, 2024 9:46 pm

sco wrote:Playing with the Den for Zach idea:

Bulls out:Zach, THT in: THJ, Thompson, Saric, DET 1st (lightly protected)
Nuggets out:MPJ, Saric in:Zach, THT
Pistons out: THJ, Thompson, DET 1st (lightly protected) in:MPJ

At least the $ work. MPJ would seem to be a good fit with DET. I don't love Thompson, but doubt we could get Holland instead.


You get a gold star for coming up with a 3 way trade.
If nobody was willing to make slight alterations, I just do this. Saric and THJ probably see that they won't play much. maybe their agents find them another team.

I don't know if DET would be willing to give up a pick for MPJ. He reminds me a lot of Otto Porter jr who when healthy looked like a real guy to have, he just was never healthy for very long.

I would rather give up Terry or Carter and keep THT, he's just the type of role player I like, size, BB IQ willingness to shoot and toughness off the bench. I guess Thompson isn't playing much this year so if DET doesn't think they have minutes for him, maybe that's why they're willing to give up on him so quickly. New front office might not have the attachment of the people who drafted him.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,852
And1: 9,285
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#363 » by Chi town » Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:05 pm

sco wrote:Playing with the Den for Zach idea:

Bulls out:Zach, THT in: THJ, Thompson, Saric, DET 1st (lightly protected)
Nuggets out:MPJ, Saric in:Zach, THT
Pistons out: THJ, Thompson, DET 1st (lightly protected) in:MPJ

At least the $ work. MPJ would seem to be a good fit with DET. I don't love Thompson, but doubt we could get Holland instead.


No way DET pays a 1st and Ausar for MPJ.

They wouldn’t even pay that for Zach.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#364 » by Infinity2152 » Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:40 pm

HomoSapien wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:Not going to keep the long repost going. The Heat have been more talented BECAUSE of Butler.


No question that Butler is a floor raiser, but you also have to give Heat culture a lot of credit. They're regularly developing guys in a meaningful way. The same can't be said for us. Pat hasn't improved since he came in the league. Dalen has been slow to improve. Coby improved last season tremendously, but otherwise has been more inconsistent than consistent. Lauri and Wendell went in the wrong direction with us as well.

We might have more talent pound for pound on the roster, but I don't think it's a given that we out-perform Miami with the addition of Butler.


I can definitely agree with this. From a GM side though, as far as players go, the most you can do is add talent. Coaching and training is a whole different side of the game. Heat transitioned from Wade/Lebron to Butler, so they had a two-way leader most of that time, winning helps keep a winning culture. We've had one-way Zach and Debo, neither who seem particularly good leaders.
2weekswithpay
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,593
And1: 2,670
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#365 » by 2weekswithpay » Sun Dec 22, 2024 12:13 am

sco wrote:I'm not sure I get the whole $50M contract debate, but I will note that guys like Jimmy, Tatum and Brown are so valuable in the playoffs because they are good 2-way players, and it's really only in the playoffs that defense starts to matter a lot, IMO.

I look at our roster and if somehow we could take the assets/cap space from Zach and Vuc deals and turn them into a true #1 option, we COULD have enough pieces in Giddey, Ball, Coby, Ayo, Matas, Pat, Smith to have a legit playoff team, and IF we luck into Matas becoming a legit #2 option, perhaps a contending team. Honestly, I'd like to see (this season) what happens if/when Smith/Ball/Matas give bigger roles.


Butler wants a two year supermax from Miami. The Heat understandably don't want to pay him that when he's 35. The 50M is an arbitrary minimum that the Bulls would have to offer Butler for him to pick up the phone. What Butler actually wants is a two-year 113M extension.

If the Bulls dump Vuc for expiring contracts and don't re-sign Lonzo, the best they could offer Butler is around 41M. The clear up the extra 8-10M they'd have to decline Terry's option and probably dump Carter.

Is it worth it to go through all the work to clear up cap space to sign a 36 year old Buter?
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,598
And1: 30,736
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#366 » by HomoSapien » Sun Dec 22, 2024 12:48 am

Doesn't trading Vuc sort of defeat the point of going after Butler?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 8,065
And1: 2,398
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#367 » by ChettheJet » Sun Dec 22, 2024 12:58 am

With the talk of D Fox moving from SAC to SAS what if the Bulls get in the middle of that with Zach?

Maybe the Kings like Zach, hey who knows what teams are thinking in that corner office. Fox heads to SAS

Spurs no doubt have to send some money to SAC, but what do the Kings and Spurs have to send to the Bulls. Could the Bulls send some of Carter, Terry, Craig out with Lavine? That makes it bigger and maybe the other two teams move more players

Huerter and Lyles from SAC, the Spurs have K Johnson, Z Collins, Castle could look like something to the Bulls. Getting Collins would be a step towards a Vucevic trade. Maybe the Bulls send enough players and take enough money from SAS to get their pick back.

I know it's not as sexy as J Butler but more realistic
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#368 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 1:08 am

2weekswithpay wrote:
sco wrote:I'm not sure I get the whole $50M contract debate, but I will note that guys like Jimmy, Tatum and Brown are so valuable in the playoffs because they are good 2-way players, and it's really only in the playoffs that defense starts to matter a lot, IMO.

I look at our roster and if somehow we could take the assets/cap space from Zach and Vuc deals and turn them into a true #1 option, we COULD have enough pieces in Giddey, Ball, Coby, Ayo, Matas, Pat, Smith to have a legit playoff team, and IF we luck into Matas becoming a legit #2 option, perhaps a contending team. Honestly, I'd like to see (this season) what happens if/when Smith/Ball/Matas give bigger roles.


Butler wants a two year supermax from Miami. The Heat understandably don't want to pay him that when he's 35. The 50M is an arbitrary minimum that the Bulls would have to offer Butler for him to pick up the phone. What Butler actually wants is a two-year 113M extension.

If the Bulls dump Vuc for expiring contracts and don't re-sign Lonzo, the best they could offer Butler is around 41M. The clear up the extra 8-10M they'd have to decline Terry's option and probably dump Carter.

Is it worth it to go through all the work to clear up cap space to sign a 36 year old Buter?


Not sure how you're calculating that $41M max. I'm looking at about $104 mill for Zach, Pat, Coby, Ayo, Carter, Matas, Terry, Phillips next year. Get rid of Carter, even if it cost us a second, clear another 7 mill, takes us to $97 mill. Cap projected to be $154.6. This also presumes neither Coby or Pat is traded this summer. Regardless of whether we're pursing Butler, it's a distinct possibility one of the two is gone. Also presumes we're not sending any players to Miami in a sign and trade. Giddey's cap hold limits us at the start of FA, but that only exist until he's signed and/or traded. The Bulls could make Butler a pretty competitive offer without gutting the roster or doing much more than they're trying to do anyway. Jimmy also seems like a guy who gets pissed when he's not given what he asked for, and will leave. He did the exact same thing to the T-Wolves, he left because he wanted more money early and acted out hard. And I'm not saying to get him at any price, lol.

As for why Butler, like I said, it's more than Butler the player I'd want. Age isn't going to make him less of a leader or less aggressive defensively. He's still going to be a dog at 36. That money's going to be spent somewhere. If you think Brandon Ingram or MPJ help the Bulls more over the next three years, go for them. Keep bringing up Butler's age, but he's actually played more games the last few years to most of the alternatives. He stays in better condition than a lot of younger players.

Offer alternatives. Say we have $50 mill cap space this summer, how do we spend it better? What FA's do we go after? Estimated cost? Butler's not just a good player, he elevates the whole defense. So I need that plus 20, 5, and 5 and proven leader. Leadership and competitiveness have value too. I'd be much more comfortable with Butler as my best player than Ingram or MPJ if I'm focused on winning.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#369 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 1:47 am

Glad we're at least having the conversation. I see the potentially negative aspects of signing 35 year old Jimmy Butler to 3 years 50 AAV max. Not sure if it's even possible. But if it is?

The presumed direction of this team is to trade Vuc and hopefully Lavine (in most cases for a less talented player(s) and future picks). Leaving us with a team of young, directionless players, no stars, no vets, and some cap space. Will being on a 30 win team help those young guys develop better than being on a 45-50 win team? You HAVE to have a couple of older guys on the team. With Lavine and Butler, we're still a damn young team, we'd have ONE older player. Not trying to hear Giddey, Lavine, Butler, Matas plus most of the rest of our young guys can't possibly win 45-50 games in the weak ass East. They have a WAAAAY better chance than the aforementioned team.

There are advantages to being an older player in the league, from a team perspective. Jimmy knows more about every star player, and every player he's guarded, than anybody on the coaching staff. He knows every team's offensive and defensive systems better. He knows more about winning and playoff basketball than anyone here. He's been in crunch time more often than every player, Zach's the only one that's remotely close. We're trying to develop a lot of young players, not just add another 2A for $50 mill and keep treading water. If it's spent on one guy, that guy HAS to be a two-way leader, not just a scorer.
2weekswithpay
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,593
And1: 2,670
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#370 » by 2weekswithpay » Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:10 am

Infinity2152 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:Butler wants a two year supermax from Miami. The Heat understandably don't want to pay him that when he's 35. The 50M is an arbitrary minimum that the Bulls would have to offer Butler for him to pick up the phone. What Butler actually wants is a two-year 113M extension.

If the Bulls dump Vuc for expiring contracts and don't re-sign Lonzo, the best they could offer Butler is around 41M. The clear up the extra 8-10M they'd have to decline Terry's option and probably dump Carter.

Is it worth it to go through all the work to clear up cap space to sign a 36 year old Buter?


Not sure how you're calculating that $41M max. I'm looking at about $104 mill for Zach, Pat, Coby, Ayo, Carter, Matas, Terry, Phillips next year. Get rid of Carter, even if it cost us a second, clear another 7 mill, takes us to $97 mill. Cap projected to be $154.6. This also presumes neither Coby or Pat is traded this summer. Regardless of whether we're pursing Butler, it's a distinct possibility one of the two is gone. Also presumes we're not sending any players to Miami in a sign and trade. Giddey's cap hold limits us at the start of FA, but that only exist until he's signed and/or traded. The Bulls could make Butler a pretty competitive offer without gutting the roster or doing much more than they're trying to do anyway. Jimmy also seems like a guy who gets pissed when he's not given what he asked for, and will leave. He did the exact same thing to the T-Wolves, he left because he wanted more money early and acted out hard.

As for why Butler, like I said, it's more than Butler the player I'd want. Age isn't going to make him less of a leader or less aggressive defensively. He's still going to be a dog at 36. That money's going to be spent somewhere. If you think Brandon Ingram or MPJ help the Bulls more over the next three years, go for them. Keep bringing up Butler's age, but he's actually played more games the last few years to most of the alternatives. He stays in better condition than a lot of younger players.


The Bull's salaries for 2025-26

Spotrac has the Bulls at 134.8M in active salary for next season. If you remove Vuc's 21.5M that's 113.3M in salary. You're off by almost 10M. The cap max is 154.6M. Subtract the active salary and you get 41.3M and this would be the most we could offer Butler.

The Bulls would presumably be taking back salary in any trade involving Coby and Pat. There aren't too many trades where one team isn't taking similar salaries back in return. Even in a sign and trade, they'd have to send out appropriate assets and salary.
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#371 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:20 am

2weekswithpay wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
2weekswithpay wrote:Butler wants a two year supermax from Miami. The Heat understandably don't want to pay him that when he's 35. The 50M is an arbitrary minimum that the Bulls would have to offer Butler for him to pick up the phone. What Butler actually wants is a two-year 113M extension.

If the Bulls dump Vuc for expiring contracts and don't re-sign Lonzo, the best they could offer Butler is around 41M. The clear up the extra 8-10M they'd have to decline Terry's option and probably dump Carter.

Is it worth it to go through all the work to clear up cap space to sign a 36 year old Buter?


Not sure how you're calculating that $41M max. I'm looking at about $104 mill for Zach, Pat, Coby, Ayo, Carter, Matas, Terry, Phillips next year. Get rid of Carter, even if it cost us a second, clear another 7 mill, takes us to $97 mill. Cap projected to be $154.6. This also presumes neither Coby or Pat is traded this summer. Regardless of whether we're pursing Butler, it's a distinct possibility one of the two is gone. Also presumes we're not sending any players to Miami in a sign and trade. Giddey's cap hold limits us at the start of FA, but that only exist until he's signed and/or traded. The Bulls could make Butler a pretty competitive offer without gutting the roster or doing much more than they're trying to do anyway. Jimmy also seems like a guy who gets pissed when he's not given what he asked for, and will leave. He did the exact same thing to the T-Wolves, he left because he wanted more money early and acted out hard.

As for why Butler, like I said, it's more than Butler the player I'd want. Age isn't going to make him less of a leader or less aggressive defensively. He's still going to be a dog at 36. That money's going to be spent somewhere. If you think Brandon Ingram or MPJ help the Bulls more over the next three years, go for them. Keep bringing up Butler's age, but he's actually played more games the last few years to most of the alternatives. He stays in better condition than a lot of younger players.


The Bull's salaries for 2025-26

Spotrac has the Bulls at 134.8M in active salary for next season. If you remove Vuc's 21.5M that's 113.3M in salary. You're off by almost 10M. The cap max is 154.6M. Subtract the active salary and you get 41.3M and this would be the most we could offer Butler.

The Bulls would presumably be taking back salary in any trade involving Coby and Pat. There aren't too many trades where one team isn't taking similar salaries back in return. Even in a sign and trade, they'd have to send out appropriate assets and salary.


Just added up the number on Spotrac, you're right. About 113.3 including Carter, who could probably be traded into cap space pretty easily, if he picks up his option. Add another 6.8 for Carter, and we're at 47.5 pretty easily. Picking up Terry's 5.4 mill option may not happen regardless, that's a lot for him. Even if trades for Coby or Pat bring back cap, not likely it will be more than we're sending (Pat particularly). We could get to a $50 mill offer pretty easily, question is not can we, but should we. We could literally trade Coby on draft night for a pick in this draft (I'm hoping, I'm hoping!).

Think everybody except Matas is on the trade block right now and we have a long time to deadline, think it's pointless to squabble over whether we can come up with a few extra mill. They could trade Carter to the Bucks or somebody for an expiring before the deadline, lol!
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#372 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:46 am

Matter of fact, y'all just made me change my trade priorities, lmao!
1. Trade Vuc for expirings and picks before deadline.
2. Trade Carter for an expiring. I'm going to every contender, give me your worst expiring bum, no picks needed. Carter is GREAT!
3. Trade Coby for a pick in this draft, multiple future firsts, or a young prospect of equal level plus expiring.
4. Trade Craig before deadline for expiring and second round pick or prospect.

I'm so/so on trading Pat, he could play up to/outplay his contract still.
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,198
And1: 1,476
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#373 » by prolific passer » Sun Dec 22, 2024 3:46 am

Dez wrote:
jump wrote:If the Bulls could nab Stewart and a pick in a Detroit 3way, that would be sweet.


No thanks on Stewart, the dude is a lunatic and he's not good enough to put up with the **** he pulls.

He's not as crazy as Oakley, Rodman, and Artest.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,783
And1: 9,357
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#374 » by Dez » Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:31 am

prolific passer wrote:
Dez wrote:
jump wrote:If the Bulls could nab Stewart and a pick in a Detroit 3way, that would be sweet.


No thanks on Stewart, the dude is a lunatic and he's not good enough to put up with the **** he pulls.

He's not as crazy as Oakley, Rodman, and Artest.


So? They had talent, this dude is just stupid.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,852
And1: 9,285
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#375 » by Chi town » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:55 am

Dez wrote:
prolific passer wrote:
Dez wrote:
No thanks on Stewart, the dude is a lunatic and he's not good enough to put up with the **** he pulls.

He's not as crazy as Oakley, Rodman, and Artest.


So? They had talent, this dude is just stupid.


Stupid and overpaid for 3 more years
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,461
And1: 7,810
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#376 » by NecessaryEvil » Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:20 pm

Read on Twitter
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,612
And1: 9,288
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#377 » by sco » Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:40 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

:banghead:
:clap:
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 8,065
And1: 2,398
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#378 » by ChettheJet » Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:45 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter


Not going to fall for a GSW report guy who 8 months after nothing happened thinks they would have given up all that for not one, not two but including Craig 3 below .500 Bulls. Trying to make himself look informed, when nobody is going to come out and say they were or weren't even thinking about that kind of move so he appears unchallenged.

The Bulls were supposedly looking for multiple picks for Caruso so it's BS to say they got the offer but said no. The Bulls in fact made no moves for the 3rd straight year and they did move Caruso and Drummond in the off season for less and nothing, so to think they passed on what they wanted at the deadline is BS
Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,799
And1: 997
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#379 » by Infinity2152 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:06 pm

HomoSapien wrote:Doesn't trading Vuc sort of defeat the point of going after Butler?


Imo, the main reason for trading Vuc would be his defense, not his age. If he was 28 and playing the same defense, most people would still want him gone. Don't think rebuild means you have to have ZERO vets starting. Based on what we're looking to do, getting Butler would give us exactly 1 vet player 30 or older on the entire team.

Bulls need at least two high-quality two-way players. Only one close is Lonzo Ball, who we can't count on. Matas or Pat MAY eventually develop into that.
User avatar
Mk0
RealGM
Posts: 26,833
And1: 21,835
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
   

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#380 » by Mk0 » Mon Dec 23, 2024 4:12 am

With the Randle situation going to the dumps in Minny could we swap Giddey for him? I don't have too much of an issue with Giddey but I don't know how he fits long term. He is a complementary piece where we don't have a star. Maybe we move him to Minny to help out fill out their Kyle Anderson role (his leaving really screwed them up)

Idk about bringing Randle to Chicago, he is a bit of a black hole in the paint, but is a real PF and at worst he would opt-in next year. But at least that gives us some money to use in a trade at the next deadline (if AKME actually made one)

My silver linings to this would be Pat/Buz at the SF slot with Randle eating minutes at PF and Coby getting back on the ball and hopefully out of his funk.

My biggest fear is that Randle would force us into a worse version of Deebo ball as he likes the same spots in the mid-range and could screw with spacing. He was always good on a rip and run fast break so maybe that wouldn't suffer too much. I watched a lot of him in LA (where I live) and his stint on the Knicks wasn't so bad. He was never getting them to the Finals but he was a legit player. When he pushes the break off a rebound he looks really good and I can see Billy really emphasizing that.

*This is all under the assumption that the FO isn't looking to tank, because let's face it they won't.
I AM A BUSINESS MAN NOW

Return to Chicago Bulls