Thunder trade
Topic
Jones
FRP, 2025 UTA (top-10 protected, 2026 top-8 protected, or nothing)
SRP, 2028 UTA (unprotected)
SRP, 2028 MIL (unprotected)
Jazz trade
Eubanks
George
Why for OKC?
Scoring depth in the backcourt + insurance at the 5 for their championship pursuit this season.
Why for UTA?
Drastically reduced production this season in exchange for a redshirted future floor general. Flexibility with their highly-unlikely-to-convey FRP returned. Restock diminished SRPs.
OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,080
- And1: 3,399
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,745
- And1: 2,444
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
Is that keyonte George ? Why would Utah trade him .
Edit - Utah probably value him higher than topic and OKC probably want more of a sure thing if we are giving up this much miscellaneous assets .
Edit - Utah probably value him higher than topic and OKC probably want more of a sure thing if we are giving up this much miscellaneous assets .
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,901
- And1: 1,238
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
Keyonte George? I don't think he'd be part of their rotation in a playoff series, and I'm not even sure he's a better prospect than Topic. Eubanks is an end of the bench big at best. If the Thunder want some big man insurance just send the Blazers a SRP for Duop Reath or something. But if this is about the Jazz getting Topic (recent lottery pick, nothing has changed since he was drafted since they knew he wouldn't play this year) then I think you'd have to look at Kessler rather than Eubanks, that is, if you really want him (I don't think so, Jazz passed on Topic in favor of Cody Williams, who I don't particularly like).
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,380
- And1: 98,230
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
I see no reason for OKC to give up that much value for a guy who, as Wemby points out, is not in OKC's playoff rotation. And the guys who are are all under team control long terrm so its not like well lets grab this guy for the future because we can't afford some other guys.
For Utah if the team is as high on George as the OP seems to be, they shouldn't do this either. They shouldn't be trading a young guy they believe could play a key role on a contending level team for a couple of mystery boxes.
For Utah if the team is as high on George as the OP seems to be, they shouldn't do this either. They shouldn't be trading a young guy they believe could play a key role on a contending level team for a couple of mystery boxes.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,080
- And1: 3,399
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
Texas Chuck wrote:I see no reason for OKC to give up that much value for a guy who, as Wemby points out, is not in OKC's playoff rotation. And the guys who are are all under team control long terrm so its not like well lets grab this guy for the future because we can't afford some other guys.
For Utah if the team is as high on George as the OP seems to be, they shouldn't do this either. They shouldn't be trading a young guy they believe could play a key role on a contending level team for a couple of mystery boxes.
I suppose it depends on how much value one assigns to the 2025 UTA FRP. I don't think the the Jazz braintrust intends for it ever to convey—it certainly doesn't look like it will this season and it becomes absolutely worthless to the Thunder if it falls in the top-8 in 2026.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,380
- And1: 98,230
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
I mean I have Topic, a maybe 1st and 2nds too much to give up for a guy you aren't going to play, right? And there is no real argument to be made he plays ahead of their current guys. I'm not saying its necessarily an unreasonable price for George in a vacuum. I think he's just not a target that makes sense for OKC really at all so I wouldn't pay anything really.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,745
- And1: 2,444
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
SkyHook wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I see no reason for OKC to give up that much value for a guy who, as Wemby points out, is not in OKC's playoff rotation. And the guys who are are all under team control long terrm so its not like well lets grab this guy for the future because we can't afford some other guys.
For Utah if the team is as high on George as the OP seems to be, they shouldn't do this either. They shouldn't be trading a young guy they believe could play a key role on a contending level team for a couple of mystery boxes.
I suppose it depends on how much value one assigns to the 2025 UTA FRP. I don't think the the Jazz braintrust intends for it ever to convey—it certainly doesn't look like it will this season and it becomes absolutely worthless to the Thunder if it falls in the top-8 in 2026.
It’s not like OKC get anything of value here.
To us topic+ jones probably worth about George and Eubanks .
So OKC is paying 2 seconds to give up something absolutely worthless ? We might as well just wait until 2026 draft and let it be nothing then.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- SkyHook
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,080
- And1: 3,399
- Joined: Jun 24, 2002
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
Devilanche wrote:SkyHook wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I see no reason for OKC to give up that much value for a guy who, as Wemby points out, is not in OKC's playoff rotation. And the guys who are are all under team control long terrm so its not like well lets grab this guy for the future because we can't afford some other guys.
For Utah if the team is as high on George as the OP seems to be, they shouldn't do this either. They shouldn't be trading a young guy they believe could play a key role on a contending level team for a couple of mystery boxes.
I suppose it depends on how much value one assigns to the 2025 UTA FRP. I don't think the the Jazz braintrust intends for it ever to convey—it certainly doesn't look like it will this season and it becomes absolutely worthless to the Thunder if it falls in the top-8 in 2026.
It’s not like OKC get anything of value here.
To us topic+ jones probably worth about George and Eubanks .
So OKC is paying 2 seconds to give up something absolutely worthless ? We might as well just wait until 2026 draft and let it be nothing then.
Okay. Thanks for the feedback.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...
... NO, YOU MOVE."
... NO, YOU MOVE."
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,043
- And1: 17,547
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
I think Utah should be looking to trade one of its future picks to have its own pick unencumbered. Something like the worst of UTA/LAL/CLE/MIN 1st in 2027, or worst of UTA/CLE/MIN 1st in 2029. OKC can punt that asset forward, Utah doesn't have to worry about losing a lottery pick in 2026. Seems like a reasonable cost for that protection.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,220
- And1: 10,942
- Joined: Jan 28, 2020
- Contact:
-
Re: OKC=UTA, 4 players + picks
SGA, Dort, Wallace, Caruso, Joe, Williams, Wiggins - George wouldn't play over any of those guys. They have the deepest guard rotation in the NBA.
Return to Trades and Transactions