ImageImage

Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything?

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#481 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Dec 24, 2024 3:44 pm

Blazinaway wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:Why on earth we didn't trade our vets is increasingly looking silly. Grant's stock has absolutely plummeted.

we can thank Clueless Joe for that, this team is inept across the board - coach/GM/ownership


If your going to suck at least be fun to watch.

Grant / Ant / Ayton taken 981 of 2611 shots so far - 38%. And each has missed games.

Our meh youth is getting little to no PT - Kris at 12mpg. Rayan at 10mpg.

Deni is only getting 26mpg and he is pretty clearly the teams best player.

Its insanity.

Meanwhile - Grant and Simons are having putrid seasons and their values have tanked. Ayton is still just eating up space.

I paid for League Pass and dont even watch the games. It wasnt even a conscious decision - I just sort of forgot about them. Thats speaks more than getting fed up. They are just nothing.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,831
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#482 » by Blazinaway » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:10 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:Why on earth we didn't trade our vets is increasingly looking silly. Grant's stock has absolutely plummeted.

we can thank Clueless Joe for that, this team is inept across the board - coach/GM/ownership


If your going to suck at least be fun to watch.

Grant / Ant / Ayton taken 981 of 2611 shots so far - 38%. And each has missed games.

Our meh youth is getting little to no PT - Kris at 12mpg. Rayan at 10mpg.

Deni is only getting 26mpg and he is pretty clearly the teams best player.

Its insanity.

Meanwhile - Grant and Simons are having putrid seasons and their values have tanked. Ayton is still just eating up space.

I paid for League Pass and dont even watch the games. It wasnt even a conscious decision - I just sort of forgot about them. Thats speaks more than getting fed up. They are just nothing.


I have a knee replacement coming up in early Jan, am hoping the pain of watching the Blazers will distract me somewhat from the pain of the TKR...LOL
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,778
And1: 14,121
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#483 » by JRoy » Tue Dec 24, 2024 7:18 pm

Blazinaway wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:we can thank Clueless Joe for that, this team is inept across the board - coach/GM/ownership


If your going to suck at least be fun to watch.

Grant / Ant / Ayton taken 981 of 2611 shots so far - 38%. And each has missed games.

Our meh youth is getting little to no PT - Kris at 12mpg. Rayan at 10mpg.

Deni is only getting 26mpg and he is pretty clearly the teams best player.

Its insanity.

Meanwhile - Grant and Simons are having putrid seasons and their values have tanked. Ayton is still just eating up space.

I paid for League Pass and dont even watch the games. It wasnt even a conscious decision - I just sort of forgot about them. Thats speaks more than getting fed up. They are just nothing.


I have a knee replacement coming up in early Jan, am hoping the pain of watching the Blazers will distract me somewhat from the pain of the TKR...LOL


That’s rough.

Good luck with recovery.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#484 » by Tim Lehrbach » Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:51 pm

I know better than to place any stock in the wisdom of the commons (Trade Board), but here I go anyway: when I look at the speculative "market" for other players on there (Cam Johnson, rental Ingram, rental Butler, LaVine, DeRozan...), it just reinforces the my perception that there are no assets to be had for our veterans. There are significantly better players potentially available in trade who are drawing tepid interest -- or at least haven't been traded for significant value yet.

It's admittedly a guess, but I just don't think teams are so eager anymore to cough up picks for rentals or role players. Never go full Afflalo.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#485 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:07 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:I know better than to place any stock in the wisdom of the commons (Trade Board), but here I go anyway: when I look at the speculative "market" for other players on there (Cam Johnson, rental Ingram, rental Butler, LaVine, DeRozan...), it just reinforces the my perception that there are no assets to be had for our veterans. There are significantly better players potentially available in trade who are drawing tepid interest -- or at least haven't been traded for significant value yet.

It's admittedly a guess, but I just don't think teams are so eager anymore to cough up picks for rentals or role players. Never go full Afflalo.


100% agreement.

I see no FRP on the table for Simons, Ayton or Grant.

Ayton has an archetype that isnt in demand, is overpaid, doesnt space the floor, doesnt protect the rim and few teams would even have both matching salary and a starting C need if he was remotely coveted.

Simons is one of a gaggle of short, score only combo guards projected to be avaliable. He is having his worst season ever and is a generationally poor defender by all advanced metrics.

Grant is having a putrid season and was handed a contract that should, in retrospect, be a capital offense. 3 more years after this at 30M+. There is a good chance that if he continues this level of play by the summer of 2025 Jerami Grant will be considered the worst contract in the entire league. Let that set in and give me some examples of worse if you disagree.

We sat on our stocks too long and the .com bubble has burst. Its basically worst case scenario for the Blazers regarding the value of these guys. They are all having their worst seasons of their careers - more or less and the NBA trade market has dramatically changed due to the new CBA. Its a total cluster ****.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,745
And1: 398
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#486 » by Butter » Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:32 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I know better than to place any stock in the wisdom of the commons (Trade Board), but here I go anyway: when I look at the speculative "market" for other players on there (Cam Johnson, rental Ingram, rental Butler, LaVine, DeRozan...), it just reinforces the my perception that there are no assets to be had for our veterans. There are significantly better players potentially available in trade who are drawing tepid interest -- or at least haven't been traded for significant value yet.

It's admittedly a guess, but I just don't think teams are so eager anymore to cough up picks for rentals or role players. Never go full Afflalo.


100% agreement.

I see no FRP on the table for Simons, Ayton or Grant.

Ayton has an archetype that isnt in demand, is overpaid, doesnt space the floor, doesnt protect the rim and few teams would even have both matching salary and a starting C need if he was remotely coveted.

Simons is one of a gaggle of short, score only combo guards projected to be avaliable. He is having his worst season ever and is a generationally poor defender by all advanced metrics.

Grant is having a putrid season and was handed a contract that should, in retrospect, be a capital offense. 3 more years after this at 30M+. There is a good chance that if he continues this level of play by the summer of 2025 Jerami Grant will be considered the worst contract in the entire league. Let that set in and give me some examples of worse if you disagree.

We sat on our stocks too long and the .com bubble has burst. Its basically worst case scenario for the Blazers regarding the value of these guys. They are all having their worst seasons of their careers - more or less and the NBA trade market has dramatically changed due to the new CBA. Its a total cluster ****.


Maybe for this trade deadline, but not forever.

Other teams might trade for Blazers players for two reasons:

1) to help them win more games
2) expiring contracts to get under the salary aprons

If Cronin can't make a move this year, I will be very bummed, but next year,

....................25-26..........26-27
Ayton: $35,550,814......$0
Simons: $27,678,571......$0
Matice: $11,500,000......$0

That's going to look pretty appealing to salary capped teams.
Rip City, baby!!!!
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,359
And1: 8,067
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#487 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Dec 25, 2024 1:48 am

Tim Lehrbach wrote:I know better than to place any stock in the wisdom of the commons (Trade Board), but here I go anyway: when I look at the speculative "market" for other players on there (Cam Johnson, rental Ingram, rental Butler, LaVine, DeRozan...), it just reinforces the my perception that there are no assets to be had for our veterans. There are significantly better players potentially available in trade who are drawing tepid interest -- or at least haven't been traded for significant value yet.

It's admittedly a guess, but I just don't think teams are so eager anymore to cough up picks for rentals or role players. Never go full Afflalo.


That's kind of where I've been at since last season's deadline. Maybe last year Grant might have fetched a protected 1st, but that 5 year deal was extremely heavy. But it seems even more unlikely this year. Simon and Ayton? forget about it. Thybulle not a chance; might not even yield a 2nd. Timelord? well, since he came to Portland he's played in 16 games while missing 95. Who is going to toss a 1st at that?

some of this has to be situational. The value of a 2024 first was much less than a 2025 first considering the strengths of the draft classes. Anybody owning a 2025 first will be squeezing them tight. There is also another significant factor: 4 teams. OKC-Nets-Spurs-Utah control 65-70 first round picks over the next 7 seasons; and about 80 second round picks. They are setting the market and looking at those teams, none of them would have any significant interest in vets like Portland has
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,172
And1: 3,120
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#488 » by PDXKnight » Wed Dec 25, 2024 5:28 am

Butter wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I know better than to place any stock in the wisdom of the commons (Trade Board), but here I go anyway: when I look at the speculative "market" for other players on there (Cam Johnson, rental Ingram, rental Butler, LaVine, DeRozan...), it just reinforces the my perception that there are no assets to be had for our veterans. There are significantly better players potentially available in trade who are drawing tepid interest -- or at least haven't been traded for significant value yet.

It's admittedly a guess, but I just don't think teams are so eager anymore to cough up picks for rentals or role players. Never go full Afflalo.


100% agreement.

I see no FRP on the table for Simons, Ayton or Grant.

Ayton has an archetype that isnt in demand, is overpaid, doesnt space the floor, doesnt protect the rim and few teams would even have both matching salary and a starting C need if he was remotely coveted.

Simons is one of a gaggle of short, score only combo guards projected to be avaliable. He is having his worst season ever and is a generationally poor defender by all advanced metrics.

Grant is having a putrid season and was handed a contract that should, in retrospect, be a capital offense. 3 more years after this at 30M+. There is a good chance that if he continues this level of play by the summer of 2025 Jerami Grant will be considered the worst contract in the entire league. Let that set in and give me some examples of worse if you disagree.

We sat on our stocks too long and the .com bubble has burst. Its basically worst case scenario for the Blazers regarding the value of these guys. They are all having their worst seasons of their careers - more or less and the NBA trade market has dramatically changed due to the new CBA. Its a total cluster ****.


Maybe for this trade deadline, but not forever.

Other teams might trade for Blazers players for two reasons:

1) to help them win more games
2) expiring contracts to get under the salary aprons

If Cronin can't make a move this year, I will be very bummed, but next year,

....................25-26..........26-27
Ayton: $35,550,814......$0
Simons: $27,678,571......$0
Matice: $11,500,000......$0

That's going to look pretty appealing to salary capped teams.


Yeah that's true, if we hold onto them teams may be paying us for our expiring contracts in 2025-26 by the deadline.

Grant is just a clunker contract, not sure where we go from here on that one but I'm betting it'll take the 2026-27 season before he's movable unless we are taking a comparable contract (or worse) back. If a team is still offering us an escape clause on that deal and Cronin isn't jumping on it I'd be pretty upset. I think there's a very real possibility if we get to the other end of the rainbow on this rebuild we will still have jerami as a role player as the cost of offloading that contract may prove too costly to be worthwhile for a year or two
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,789
And1: 20,369
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#489 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 25, 2024 5:34 pm

PDXKnight wrote:Grant is just a clunker contract, not sure where we go from here on that one but I'm betting it'll take the 2026-27 season before he's movable unless we are taking a comparable contract (or worse) back. If a team is still offering us an escape clause on that deal and Cronin isn't jumping on it I'd be pretty upset. I think there's a very real possibility if we get to the other end of the rainbow on this rebuild we will still have jerami as a role player as the cost of offloading that contract may prove too costly to be worthwhile for a year or two

I can't remember who brought it up, but I liked the Grant for Middelton straight up trade -- no draft assets transferred.

Why would Milwaukee do this. It times well with their window and Grant plays more than Middleton. Grant is also a very good 3-point shooter especially when left open.

It gives Portland more cap flexibility.

Another variation would be Grant & Rupert for Middelton & AJ Johnson.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#490 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed Dec 25, 2024 5:53 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:Grant is just a clunker contract, not sure where we go from here on that one but I'm betting it'll take the 2026-27 season before he's movable unless we are taking a comparable contract (or worse) back. If a team is still offering us an escape clause on that deal and Cronin isn't jumping on it I'd be pretty upset. I think there's a very real possibility if we get to the other end of the rainbow on this rebuild we will still have jerami as a role player as the cost of offloading that contract may prove too costly to be worthwhile for a year or two

I can't remember who brought it up, but I liked the Grant for Middelton straight up trade -- no draft assets transferred.

Why would Milwaukee do this. It times well with their window and Grant plays more than Middleton. Grant is also a very good 3-point shooter especially when left open.

It gives Portland more cap flexibility.

Another variation would be Grant & Rupert for Middelton & AJ Johnson.


MIL fans had a pretty negative reception to that idea. Middleton has a higher ceiling and many were not willing to take on Grant's much longer deal.

Kris also looks back to form the past 3 games or so. Mids has had 5+ assist in 2 of his last 3 games. Grant has managed 5+ in 3 out of 27 games this year. Middleton for sure is a more dynamic player when healthy.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,789
And1: 20,369
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#491 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 25, 2024 6:19 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:Grant is just a clunker contract, not sure where we go from here on that one but I'm betting it'll take the 2026-27 season before he's movable unless we are taking a comparable contract (or worse) back. If a team is still offering us an escape clause on that deal and Cronin isn't jumping on it I'd be pretty upset. I think there's a very real possibility if we get to the other end of the rainbow on this rebuild we will still have jerami as a role player as the cost of offloading that contract may prove too costly to be worthwhile for a year or two

I can't remember who brought it up, but I liked the Grant for Middelton straight up trade -- no draft assets transferred.

Why would Milwaukee do this. It times well with their window and Grant plays more than Middleton. Grant is also a very good 3-point shooter especially when left open.

It gives Portland more cap flexibility.

Another variation would be Grant & Rupert for Middelton & AJ Johnson.

MIL fans had a pretty negative reception to that idea. Middleton has a higher ceiling and many were not willing to take on Grant's much longer deal.

Kris also looks back to form the past 3 games or so. Mids has had 5+ assist in 2 of his last 3 games. Grant has managed 5+ in 3 out of 27 games this year. Middleton for sure is a more dynamic player when healthy.

Yep.

But that is the key. Will he even be able to play in the playoffs...

That will be a trade-off that a GM would have to consider. An interesting one at that...
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,172
And1: 3,120
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#492 » by PDXKnight » Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:10 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:I can't remember who brought it up, but I liked the Grant for Middelton straight up trade -- no draft assets transferred.

Why would Milwaukee do this. It times well with their window and Grant plays more than Middleton. Grant is also a very good 3-point shooter especially when left open.

It gives Portland more cap flexibility.

Another variation would be Grant & Rupert for Middelton & AJ Johnson.

MIL fans had a pretty negative reception to that idea. Middleton has a higher ceiling and many were not willing to take on Grant's much longer deal.

Kris also looks back to form the past 3 games or so. Mids has had 5+ assist in 2 of his last 3 games. Grant has managed 5+ in 3 out of 27 games this year. Middleton for sure is a more dynamic player when healthy.

Yep.

But that is the key. Will he even be able to play in the playoffs...

That will be a trade-off that a GM would have to consider. An interesting one at that...


It depends if you view jerami grant as a net negative with his current contract. As it stands I'd imagine a good amount of teams might indeed consider his deal a negative and would not trade a comparable player (in terms of net production) on a shorter deal for Grant on a longer contract without added incentive to offset the potential negative value of the contract
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,789
And1: 20,369
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#493 » by dckingsfan » Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:33 pm

PDXKnight wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:MIL fans had a pretty negative reception to that idea. Middleton has a higher ceiling and many were not willing to take on Grant's much longer deal.

Kris also looks back to form the past 3 games or so. Mids has had 5+ assist in 2 of his last 3 games. Grant has managed 5+ in 3 out of 27 games this year. Middleton for sure is a more dynamic player when healthy.

Yep.

But that is the key. Will he even be able to play in the playoffs...

That will be a trade-off that a GM would have to consider. An interesting one at that...


It depends if you view jerami grant as a net negative with his current contract. As it stands I'd imagine a good amount of teams might indeed consider his deal a negative and would not trade a comparable player (in terms of net production) on a shorter deal for Grant on a longer contract without added incentive to offset the potential negative value of the contract

Can't disagree there. In this case, will Middleton be available in the playoffs vs. his better contact. That is the trade-off...
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,172
And1: 3,120
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#494 » by PDXKnight » Thu Dec 26, 2024 3:01 am

dckingsfan wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Yep.

But that is the key. Will he even be able to play in the playoffs...

That will be a trade-off that a GM would have to consider. An interesting one at that...


It depends if you view jerami grant as a net negative with his current contract. As it stands I'd imagine a good amount of teams might indeed consider his deal a negative and would not trade a comparable player (in terms of net production) on a shorter deal for Grant on a longer contract without added incentive to offset the potential negative value of the contract

Can't disagree there. In this case, will Middleton be available in the playoffs vs. his better contact. That is the trade-off...


Perhaps, if we could get them to agree to a straight swap we'd better take it and run though :lol:
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,188
And1: 1,222
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#495 » by Walton1one » Thu Dec 26, 2024 8:24 pm

Scoot trade rumor:

Don't see this happening, seems pretty favorable to UTA IMO.

Blazers receive: Keldon Johnson, a 2025 second-round pick from the Spurs, a 2026 second-round draft pick from the Spurs, and a 2027 second-round draft pick from the Spurs

Jazz receive: Scoot Henderson, Malaki Branham, Sidy Cissoko, and a 2025 first-round draft pick from the Spurs

Spurs receive: Collin Sexton and Matisse Thybulle

The Blazers would get a young wing in Keldon Johnson who has a lot of physical tools. He just needs to be on a decent team to showcase how good he can be. Portland would also be able to get some draft capital to help fund their continued rebuild.

The Jazz would get a lot of young players, including Henderson. They are also a team in rebuild mode. Getting all of those young players, as well as a first-round pick, makes this trade very enticing for them. Meanwhile, the Spurs get two players who can help them win now.


https://www.yardbarker.com/nba/articles/blockbuster_trade_proposal_sees_blazers_move_on_from_scoot_henderson/s1_16763_41470707
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,285
And1: 1,409
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#496 » by cucad8 » Thu Dec 26, 2024 8:59 pm

LOL. Jazz get a 1st and Scoot for Colin Sexton?

Also, this isn't a rumor. This is the equivalent of the trades and transactions board here.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,745
And1: 398
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#497 » by Butter » Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:00 pm

Walton1one wrote:Scoot trade rumor:

Don't see this happening, seems pretty favorable to UTA IMO.

Blazers receive: Keldon Johnson, a 2025 second-round pick from the Spurs, a 2026 second-round draft pick from the Spurs, and a 2027 second-round draft pick from the Spurs

Jazz receive: Scoot Henderson, Malaki Branham, Sidy Cissoko, and a 2025 first-round draft pick from the Spurs

Spurs receive: Collin Sexton and Matisse Thybulle

The Blazers would get a young wing in Keldon Johnson who has a lot of physical tools. He just needs to be on a decent team to showcase how good he can be. Portland would also be able to get some draft capital to help fund their continued rebuild.

The Jazz would get a lot of young players, including Henderson. They are also a team in rebuild mode. Getting all of those young players, as well as a first-round pick, makes this trade very enticing for them. Meanwhile, the Spurs get two players who can help them win now.


https://www.yardbarker.com/nba/articles/blockbuster_trade_proposal_sees_blazers_move_on_from_scoot_henderson/s1_16763_41470707


I'm not against trading Scoot, but this is a sell low deal. The Blazers sunk cost on Scoot is a 3rd overall pick. Kelson Johnson might be nice, but he's got $17.5M for two more years after this season.

Blazers don't gain salary space and don't get 1RPs?

Id rather just hold onto Scoot and see if he can improve.
Rip City, baby!!!!
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#498 » by Tim Lehrbach » Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:06 pm

Yeah, there's no point in moving Scoot right now. As of now, he's a bust and would return nothing worthwhile in trade. Might as well just let him play out his contract and hope for the best.
Clipsz 4 Life

January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006

Saxon

February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#499 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Dec 26, 2024 10:19 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:Yeah, there's no point in moving Scoot right now. As of now, he's a bust and would return nothing worthwhile in trade. Might as well just let him play out his contract and hope for the best.


This is generally where I am. I do think there is a conversation to be had if we take a PG w/ our FRP in 2025.

A team with numerous FRP may be willing to move 1 for Scoot. In this scenario it would be pretty hard to pass up. Brooklyn is projected to have 2 FRP in that 25-30 range. If we take a stud like Dylan, Kasparas or even Fears (Who is skyrocketing up boards IMO - kid is a beast) then using Scoot to get a late FRP and snag a forward would be a decent play.

I am totally out on Scoot. If he turns it around, great. At this point I am not sure he can even rebuild his game to be a Kris Dunn level backup. I can see him getting a few vet min deals after his rookie deal and being out of the league by 24-25.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,745
And1: 398
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#500 » by Butter » Thu Dec 26, 2024 11:36 pm

Id like to see Scoot with a really good developmental coach
Rip City, baby!!!!

Return to Portland Trail Blazers