Homer38 wrote:
Even as a Wolves fan, I would not describe the DAL-MIN game as “Ant comes up clutch.”
I hate when I have agendas pushed on me.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Homer38 wrote:
DOT wrote:Wingy wrote:DOT wrote:I legitimately don't get how it's been so long and people still don't understand why ratings are a poor assessment in the modern day due to changes in how media is consumed
It's like, you have to have had it explained to you by now, so either you're intentionally misunderstanding because you want to make a point, or you're just dumb. Either way it's pointless to keep trying to explain it.
Yes, it’s not that complex, but it’s the only measurement we have. Saying “destroyed” is foolish regardless when you don’t know how many eyeballs were on either product.
I don't know why you're so mad
And they were clearly talking about the quality of the product, not how many eyeballs were on it. I thought that was obvious, but then again, to someone who only uses ratings as a measurement for quality, I can see where you would get confused.
Hornet Mania wrote:Let's see how many people actually watched. If quality NBA basketball is ignored in favor of NFL blowouts it's a black eye for the association.
But it is nice the games were so compelling this year. The NBA needed good contests to give them some chance against the NFL juggernaut, the teams gave them the best possible chance to stave off the invader.
Hornet Mania wrote:Let's see how many people actually watched. If quality NBA basketball is ignored in favor of NFL blowouts it's a black eye for the association.
But it is nice the games were so compelling this year. The NBA needed good contests to give them some chance against the NFL juggernaut, the teams gave them the best possible chance to stave off the invader.
DaGawd wrote:the nfl is overstepping by trying to take christmas too.. i could see it backfiring on them as by christmas most teams are either gearing up for the playoffs or tanking so games won’t be great
LockoutSeason wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:Let's see how many people actually watched. If quality NBA basketball is ignored in favor of NFL blowouts it's a black eye for the association.
But it is nice the games were so compelling this year. The NBA needed good contests to give them some chance against the NFL juggernaut, the teams gave them the best possible chance to stave off the invader.
It’s not a black eye for the NBA, it just means that high ratings =/= quality.
Hornet Mania wrote:LockoutSeason wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:Let's see how many people actually watched. If quality NBA basketball is ignored in favor of NFL blowouts it's a black eye for the association.
But it is nice the games were so compelling this year. The NBA needed good contests to give them some chance against the NFL juggernaut, the teams gave them the best possible chance to stave off the invader.
It’s not a black eye for the NBA, it just means that high ratings =/= quality.
The quality of a product, especially a pro sports league, isn't judged by one day. The NFL draws far more attention than the NBA because it's considered a superior product overall by the mainstream consumer, and that opinion has been reinforced over years. The regular season matters in that league, and tends to have closer games as well which drives public interest.
It's silly to argue that if the NBA loses the ratings battle on Christmas to the NFL it indicates that quality of play doesn't matter. The NFL has been putting out a better product the entire season up to this point, with many more compelling games, whereas one of the biggest storylines surrounding the NBA regular season is how fan interest has fallen off.
Tor_Raps wrote:It's shouldn't be about what the ratings are just for 1 day. Problem with the NBA was that it has been trending downwards for years so this sort of thing slowly diminishes your product as people just stop giving a crap after a while.
Yesterday was a good first step but it needs to happen more often for people to start giving a crap again. All it takes is a bunch of stars load managing the next set of games and we'll be back where we started lol.
Snotbubbles wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:It's shouldn't be about what the ratings are just for 1 day. Problem with the NBA was that it has been trending downwards for years so this sort of thing slowly diminishes your product as people just stop giving a crap after a while.
Yesterday was a good first step but it needs to happen more often for people to start giving a crap again. All it takes is a bunch of stars load managing the next set of games and we'll be back where we started lol.
Exactly. Last year my son wanted to see Jimmy Butler play. So I bought tickets to the Heat v Sixers. Butler played the game before, and when we got to the arena, to no surprise, Butler is a scratch. Embiid didn't play either (we knew he was out already). I dropped a few hundred dollars on parking, tickets and food and didn't even get to see the star we paid to see play. Had I been at home, I would have changed the channel. That's the NBA experience, and it's why the sport is losing viewership.