Cleveland: Niang, Travers, Porter, and a 2nd
Denver: Saric, Watson, and Tyson
Cavs: Take a shot on a young wing player
Denver: Get a PF who can be useful next to Jokic. Allocate backup depth better with Porter who’s young and locked in.
Cleveland/Denver
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Cleveland/Denver
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,741
- And1: 24,968
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: Cleveland/Denver
Nothing here worth Denver putting Watson in. Niang is a big traffic cone, not seeing the fit.
Re: Cleveland/Denver
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,145
- And1: 2,495
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cleveland/Denver
Not going to mess with the Cavs’ chemistry for this.
Re: Cleveland/Denver
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,914
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland/Denver
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Nothing here worth Denver putting Watson in. Niang is a big traffic cone, not seeing the fit.
While I agree with the general no-go sentiment, Niang does provide something that Denver sorely lacks, 3 point shooting.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland/Denver
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,807
- And1: 35,895
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland/Denver
toooskies wrote:Not going to mess with the Cavs’ chemistry for this.
Agreed. I get the concern that Niang might not be playable in the playoffs, but Im not convinced Saric is either.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland/Denver
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,843
- And1: 3,856
- Joined: Jun 16, 2018
-
Re: Cleveland/Denver
mcfly1204 wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Nothing here worth Denver putting Watson in. Niang is a big traffic cone, not seeing the fit.
While I agree with the general no-go sentiment, Niang does provide something that Denver sorely lacks, 3 point shooting.
He would have been 5th best 3pt shooter in Denver looking at 3pt%
Re: Cleveland/Denver
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,914
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland/Denver
BelgradeNugget wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Nothing here worth Denver putting Watson in. Niang is a big traffic cone, not seeing the fit.
While I agree with the general no-go sentiment, Niang does provide something that Denver sorely lacks, 3 point shooting.
He would have been 5th best 3pt shooter in Denver looking at 3pt%
And if you look a bit closer, focusing on Denver being dead last in the league in 3PAs, Niang would be tied for third (Jokic), while only averaging 20.9MPG this season.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland/Denver
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,843
- And1: 3,856
- Joined: Jun 16, 2018
-
Re: Cleveland/Denver
mcfly1204 wrote:BelgradeNugget wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:While I agree with the general no-go sentiment, Niang does provide something that Denver sorely lacks, 3 point shooting.
He would have been 5th best 3pt shooter in Denver looking at 3pt%
And if you look a bit closer, focusing on Denver being dead last in the league in 3PAs, Niang would be tied for third (Jokic), while only averaging 20.9MPG this season.
Yes, you are right, but I don't think if he was playing in Denver he would get as many 3pt shots he is shooting now. It is not their style. They prefer "good shots" or "open shots" from wherever. Jokic, Murray, MPJ and Strawther are all great 3pt shooters who can increse 3pt shooting volume if they change their style.
Return to Trades and Transactions