Jeff Van Gully wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
good to know. couldn't tell from the game thread posts... every game.
now post the minutes per game leaders. because this is ironic and sensational.
the irony being that these listed knicks are leading in total minutes because we have 1 missed game (personal reasons) this season among those leaders. as in... they've been healthy while others (who do not play for thibs) have not.
brunson continues to average under 35, KAT around 34. most star players play more MPG than both of them.
our wings are playing heavy minutes. we're clearly leaning on them. as has been mentioned in threads ad nauseam, we started the season with injured rotation guys and probably didn't have the best options to win in the meantime. would be nice to see someone else trusted in the mix to bring that down. shamet just made it back and the rotation just expanded from 8 to 9 (not 6 to 7 like some like to suggest).
lastly, minutes police never want to sketch out a full rotation, which is hard and the work of a coach. just numbers that don't have regard for who is playing when, which is easy and the work of a couch. i would legit love to see rotation suggestions that mitigate the minutes better. but it's frustrating to watch either uniformed or intentionally misleading spicy takes because folks just feel a way.
if you gonna be po-po, the community has to trust.
I'll be honest...you coming way too hot. No one called out anyone specifically and can talk ball, its a relevant convo.Also the totality of minutes matter. If these guys were given "off" days and sitting on second nights of back to backs like a lot of other guys that would be one thing. But they play every night. Which is an awesome mentality but you also have to save them from themselves. We have bigger and brighter goals then beating WASH in december. And I'm not even saying we would lose if we played more bench...maybe the defensive effort would have been better if we used the end of bench guys more.
There is no situation on a back to back in a non playoff game or must win situation should a player play the entire 2nd half and overtime.
just talking ball. no personal attacks. just responses. sorry you feel attacked, but i'm just engaging you in the conversation you presented. i read a lot of the GTs and a lot of it doesn't sound like what you said.

forgive me if that came across "hot."
so now the point of your post was there should be load managment days? if so, and if they make a difference, maybe this might have been a good one for brunson... but def at the expense of a W last night given what it took to beat that inspired wizards team. i'd be more open to those kinds of days later in the season and closer to the playoffs after the team has gotten things down cold. but... cumulative minutes.
i think it's a worthwhile thing to ask/consider if an expanded rotation would keep everyone fresher and healthier. but that's a pivot into a different point and conversation altogether. i just said that i genuinely would like to see the fleshed out rotation suggestions.
how was I not to take that as "hot" it came across pretty spicy

but I will take you for your word.
All in context right. We needed Brunson to drop a double nickle because we played with zero defensive intensity.
If you come out the gate with better defense a bad shooting team like Wash might not get as hot and then we don't need Capt to save us down the stretch and maybe this game isn't as close. I don't look at it like if Brunson didn't play we need to make up his 55 pts this game. The game might be different who knows.
I just think the totality of minutes matter. We have 3 guys in the top 10 in mpg right now. and then obviously 4 in the top 6 in total minutes.
For example Jamal Murray is playing more MPG but he isn't playing in b2b. I think there is a difference if we say took a player and sat him a selective game to give them extra rest. I get our mentality is to win every minute of every game. I respect Thibs for his excessive compulsion about the game and winning.
My simple solution would be to feel the game out better. Payne and Shamet played in the 1st half but didn't get off the bench in the 2nd half. Those should be trustworthy vets.
And OG didn't have it yesterday (looked gassed) vs a team that really didn't have a got to wing scored. Did he really have to play 44 mins? especially on the 2nd night of a b2b?