Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Guano wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Hart is having the best season of his career & it needs to be mentioned more in the Knicks ecosystem
14.4 PPG 8.6 RPG 5.5 APG 1.5 SPG
57.6% on 9.4 FGA
39.3% on 3.5 3PA
81.4% on 2.7 FTA
Meant in no way to discredit jHart but kat has really helped in unlocking his full potential. Kats impact goes beyond his own numbers.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Guano wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Hart is having the best season of his career & it needs to be mentioned more in the Knicks ecosystem
14.4 PPG 8.6 RPG 5.5 APG 1.5 SPG
57.6% on 9.4 FGA
39.3% on 3.5 3PA
81.4% on 2.7 FTA
Meant in no way to discredit jHart but kat has really helped in unlocking his full potential. Kats impact goes beyond his own numbers.
The Hart-RJ-Mitch lineups really made people think Josh Hart wasn't a good enough basketball player smh
SelbyCobra wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:I swear right after Josh signed that contract knives were out and I felt like the only one defending him. Had to fight off lots of people calling him overpaid and now everybody loves him. Glad everyone learned ball finally
I had a similar memory of that time and just went back to look at the post I made contextualizing the deal and how good it could be, and in retrospect it seems like it wasn't a high volume of people, but instead a few people at high volume.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2313678&hilit=Hart
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
SelbyCobra wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:I swear right after Josh signed that contract knives were out and I felt like the only one defending him. Had to fight off lots of people calling him overpaid and now everybody loves him. Glad everyone learned ball finally
I had a similar memory of that time and just went back to look at the post I made contextualizing the deal and how good it could be, and in retrospect it seems like it wasn't a high volume of people, but instead a few people at high volume.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2313678&hilit=Hart
god shammgod wrote:it all still rests though on getting a top 10 player here somehow. And there's really no reason for me to believe that's gonna happen.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:I swear right after Josh signed that contract knives were out and I felt like the only one defending him. Had to fight off lots of people calling him overpaid and now everybody loves him. Glad everyone learned ball finally
I had a similar memory of that time and just went back to look at the post I made contextualizing the deal and how good it could be, and in retrospect it seems like it wasn't a high volume of people, but instead a few people at high volume.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2313678&hilit=Hart
I don't even want to look at that thread
I just know I wasn't right
3toheadmelo wrote:NowWHYcee7 wrote:We will find out what we really are against OKC.
I’m ready to go full homer if we beat them
Besart19 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NowWHYcee7 wrote:We will find out what we really are against OKC.
I’m ready to go full homer if we beat them
MIkal and OG would limit SGA to below 18 pts
Guano wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:I swear right after Josh signed that contract knives were out and I felt like the only one defending him. Had to fight off lots of people calling him overpaid and now everybody loves him. Glad everyone learned ball finally
I had a similar memory of that time and just went back to look at the post I made contextualizing the deal and how good it could be, and in retrospect it seems like it wasn't a high volume of people, but instead a few people at high volume.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2313678&hilit=Hart
I don't even want to look at that thread
I just know I wasn't right
Context wrote:Gee wiz fellas, there's another game tomorrow and I haven't even put up the new game thread. Well, I better get cracking!
Fat Kat wrote:Guano wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:
I had a similar memory of that time and just went back to look at the post I made contextualizing the deal and how good it could be, and in retrospect it seems like it wasn't a high volume of people, but instead a few people at high volume.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2313678&hilit=Hart
I don't even want to look at that thread
I just know I wasn't right
Not that bad, mainly the usual suspects. People think that being negative makes them appear intelligent to others. That’s why the same posters are always cynical.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Clyde_Style wrote:Context wrote:Gee wiz fellas, there's another game tomorrow and I haven't even put up the new game thread. Well, I better get cracking!
Context wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Context wrote:Gee wiz fellas, there's another game tomorrow and I haven't even put up the new game thread. Well, I better get cracking!
After the ball drops I'll finish
KnixinSix wrote:Context wrote:Guano wrote:
Mitch is nothing but a theory at this point. We sit around and talk about the what ifs but there is never going to be an actual experiment to test out.
that might be a fair take Guano but I dont believe it
Mitch was legitimately a DPOY level candidate before he went down last year. His effect on a Thibs D can not be understated. That said he has trouble staying healthy. But he is still young so I would not entirely give up on him either. My ideal would be to get a cheaper salary player that wont cost Mitch in a trade like Kessler or Richards maybe even Valanciunus. Stewart at 15, Poetl at 19 would definitely require Mitch going back. Valanciunas would likely cost Precious and some filler.
