NW wrote:DevinVassell wrote:It's a good question.
Green probably won't get you much. Lakers or another contender might give you something.
Steph on the other hand WOULD have gotten you a haul but with each passing day his value continues to decrease. It is what it is.
Obviously Steph to OKC is the way to go if your looking to trade him. Makes to much sense.
They are a team in the highest echelon competing for a championship RIGHT NOW. Steph can get out of purgatory, compete and put them over the top... and they can pay him 63M when he's almost 40. Perfect.
OKC are stacked and have no need for more rookies and have a plethora of picks to offer. Perfect.
Curry
for
Hartenstein, Dort, Dieng, Picks.
Then you can flip those 3 with our remaining vets for any picks you can get... and you have built up a decent war chest moving forward. Better than burning out with no future.
OKC isn’t going with a small Steph/SGA backcourt. Come on.
The teams that would take Steph probably between the CBA, salaries and available picks probably wouldn’t give much, and since Steph likely isn’t trying to anywhere anyway, there’s no point.
When Steph/Dray/Kerr ride off into the sunset in a couple years, the books will be clean with cap room and the Warriors should have all their picks. That’s the future.
Everything else, the current picks and all the players not named Steph/Dray, are fair game and should be used to improve the team. Just not trusting Dunleavy, because as of now, you could argue every move he’s made starting with the Poole/CP3 deal (after letting CP3 walk) has bombed
What the? Since when is SGA small? He's 6'6. The same height as Klay.