What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,040
And1: 17,544
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#61 » by babyjax13 » Thu Jan 2, 2025 7:35 am

dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood

Offensively Sexton and LaVine have had almost identical impacts for the past 3 seasons (haven't looked this year). He's very impactful as a scorer. His defense is bad, but it isn't because of effort - which, depending on your perspective, makes it better or worse lol
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,467
And1: 43,615
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#62 » by zimpy27 » Thu Jan 2, 2025 8:02 am

dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood



Lakers wouldn't want a small guard, they're purposefully trying to be big at the guard spot.

Both are good players but aren't the right pieces for the Lakers. The players would fit but wouldn't improve lakers to the degree that they would cost the Lakers in FRPs. I just don't see it happening.

I wouldn't hate it but for the price I think it would be wrong.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
nzahir
RealGM
Posts: 11,550
And1: 5,081
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#63 » by nzahir » Thu Jan 2, 2025 8:28 am

babyjax13 wrote:
dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood

Offensively Sexton and LaVine have had almost identical impacts for the past 3 seasons (haven't looked this year). He's very impactful as a scorer. His defense is bad, but it isn't because of effort - which, depending on your perspective, makes it better or worse lol

Thats the worrying part lol

Hard to justify paying assets for a guy who will have real playoff issues at least on 1 end

Lonzo is my preffered realistic pg choice, I like having size. Injury is the risk here and his shooting hasnt come back yet, but still early

Brgodon is similar, no longer really a good defender, but a better shooter

CP3 would be nice. Not big, but still plays smart defense

Pacers have T.J. and Nembhard....is one available?

If we have to give up 2 1sts (protect one of them slightly) and its say between Nembhard and Turner or Sexton and Kessler, I much rather see if Indy is interested
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,040
And1: 17,544
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#64 » by babyjax13 » Thu Jan 2, 2025 8:30 am

nzahir wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:
dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood

Offensively Sexton and LaVine have had almost identical impacts for the past 3 seasons (haven't looked this year). He's very impactful as a scorer. His defense is bad, but it isn't because of effort - which, depending on your perspective, makes it better or worse lol

Thats the worrying part lol

Hard to justify paying assets for a guy who will have real playoff issues at least on 1 end

Lonzo is my preffered realistic pg choice, I like having size. Injury is the risk here and his shooting hasnt come back yet, but still early

Brgodon is similar, no longer really a good defender, but a better shooter

CP3 would be nice. Not big, but still plays smart defense

Pacers have T.J. and Nembhard....is one available?

If we have to give up 2 1sts (protect one of them slightly) and its say between Nembhard and Turner or Sexton and Kessler, I much rather see if Indy is interested

That Indi package isn't coming for two firsts or even two firsts and Knecht. I think the other targets make sense.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
dcstanley
Starter
Posts: 2,333
And1: 1,509
Joined: Nov 20, 2017

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#65 » by dcstanley » Thu Jan 2, 2025 5:00 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood



Lakers wouldn't want a small guard, they're purposefully trying to be big at the guard spot.

Both are good players but aren't the right pieces for the Lakers. The players would fit but wouldn't improve lakers to the degree that they would cost the Lakers in FRPs. I just don't see it happening.

I wouldn't hate it but for the price I think it would be wrong.

I think we disagree about Kessler.

I do agree about Sexton, not the best target. But I think Lakers need a guard that can slot in for 20-30 minutes (depending on the game) that adds creation and shooting. Basically a Russell replacement but better fitting. Of the guys potentially available, I think White, Monk, Sexton, Quickley (huge salary though), Smart, Brogdon, Lonzo, Nembhard fit the bill to varying degrees. Don't think someone like Brown makes sense, he helps the defense but doesn't really address the creation/shooting issues.

I also like the idea of trading for Ingram.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,467
And1: 43,615
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#66 » by zimpy27 » Thu Jan 2, 2025 11:04 pm

dcstanley wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
dcstanley wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Not to beat a dead horse, but starting to think they should just overpay for Kessler/Sexton. Sexton appears to be an awful defensive player but just looking at the data he seems to be one of the most underrated offensive players in the league- top 25 in offensive EPM last season, higher overall EPM than Bam and offensive EPM on par with KD , 60+ TS% for three straight seasons. Send Vincent/2027 protections removed/2029 unprotected/a pick swap to Utah and Vando/SRPs or more to a third team.

Reaves/Christie/Bron/AD/Kessler
Sexton/Knecht/DFS/Rui/Wood



Lakers wouldn't want a small guard, they're purposefully trying to be big at the guard spot.

Both are good players but aren't the right pieces for the Lakers. The players would fit but wouldn't improve lakers to the degree that they would cost the Lakers in FRPs. I just don't see it happening.

I wouldn't hate it but for the price I think it would be wrong.

I think we disagree about Kessler.

I do agree about Sexton, not the best target. But I think Lakers need a guard that can slot in for 20-30 minutes (depending on the game) that adds creation and shooting. Basically a Russell replacement but better fitting. Of the guys potentially available, I think White, Monk, Sexton, Quickley (huge salary though), Smart, Brogdon, Lonzo, Nembhard fit the bill to varying degrees. Don't think someone like Brown makes sense, he helps the defense but doesn't really address the creation/shooting issues.

I also like the idea of trading for Ingram.



Yeah Nembhard, Smart, Lonzo are all god targets. I think Brown is a strong target and he is a good handler. Lakers don't really need another primary playmaker, they need a ball handler and secondary playmaker which Brown has been in his career.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,834
And1: 7,802
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#67 » by jayjaysee » Thu Jan 2, 2025 11:14 pm

I stick with Ayo.

Chicago needs to be open to trading more than just Vuc and LaVine. Ayo’s bargain contract is being wasted and then he’ll just be a good enough two way rotation guard.. But on a contender, it’s a year and a half of a top 8 rotation piece making below the MLE…
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,467
And1: 43,615
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be? 

Post#68 » by zimpy27 » Fri Jan 3, 2025 8:49 am

jayjaysee wrote:I stick with Ayo.

Chicago needs to be open to trading more than just Vuc and LaVine. Ayo’s bargain contract is being wasted and then he’ll just be a good enough two way rotation guard.. But on a contender, it’s a year and a half of a top 8 rotation piece making below the MLE…


I low-key like what THT has been doing this year too. Bulls have a few good 2-way targets.

Lonzo, Ayo, THT, Smith
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie

Return to Trades and Transactions