ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,632
And1: 5,758
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#241 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:05 pm

Gravy wrote:Guy on KFS podcast says the Thunder give up the most corner threes in the league. OG and Mikal will have opportunity to hit those shots tonight.

I need 2/3 from Achiuwa 8-)
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,726
And1: 18,731
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#242 » by Fury » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:08 pm

Guano wrote:
Fury wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:This Thunder "13 game win streak" is so stupid. Their loss to the Bucks in the NBA Cup counted as a regular season game in the standings, so this notion that it doesn't count for win streak purposes is ridiculous.

The reality is they've won 8 in a row, and 13 of their last 14 (which is still great).


That is stupid and more reason to get rid of the stupid Cup


Hard agree!

The cup is stupid as hell. Never liked that thing and always said it was a dumb gimmick.

Real hoop purist, like me and rob, aren't swayed by false idols. We have are eye on the real prize - an nba championship.


I wanted to give it a chance like my beloved EPL, but it won’t work unless we relegate teams and have them compete with real NBA teams
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,619
And1: 66,990
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#243 » by Guano » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:12 pm

Fury wrote:
Guano wrote:
Fury wrote:
That is stupid and more reason to get rid of the stupid Cup


Hard agree!

The cup is stupid as hell. Never liked that thing and always said it was a dumb gimmick.

Real hoop purist, like me and rob, aren't swayed by false idols. We have are eye on the real prize - an nba championship.


I wanted to give it a chance like my beloved EPL, but it won’t work unless we relegate teams and have them compete with real NBA teams


I'm a liar.

I wanted it really bad but since we lost I'm discrediting it.

In truth I think it is gimmicky but also find it kinda fun. I do think it would be better if they made it in collaboration somehow with a euro champion squad just for fun.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,481
And1: 27,167
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#244 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:19 pm

Guano wrote:
Fury wrote:
Guano wrote:
Hard agree!

The cup is stupid as hell. Never liked that thing and always said it was a dumb gimmick.

Real hoop purist, like me and rob, aren't swayed by false idols. We have are eye on the real prize - an nba championship.


I wanted to give it a chance like my beloved EPL, but it won’t work unless we relegate teams and have them compete with real NBA teams


I'm a liar.

I wanted it really bad but since we lost I'm discrediting it.

In truth I think it is gimmicky but also find it kinda fun. I do think it would be better if they made it in collaboration somehow with a euro champion squad just for fun.


It definitely added some excitement to those games but, I think it's because we just wanna win something!!! ANYTHING!! :lol:
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,619
And1: 66,990
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#245 » by Guano » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:27 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Guano wrote:
Fury wrote:
I wanted to give it a chance like my beloved EPL, but it won’t work unless we relegate teams and have them compete with real NBA teams


I'm a liar.

I wanted it really bad but since we lost I'm discrediting it.

In truth I think it is gimmicky but also find it kinda fun. I do think it would be better if they made it in collaboration somehow with a euro champion squad just for fun.


It definitely added some excitement to those games but, I think it's because we just wanna win something!!! ANYTHING!! :lol:


Like this game tonight.

I know i shouldn't put too much stock in just one game. But I'm a long time Knicks fan and I can't help be pessimistic. I have this doubt that we just beat up on cupcakes and that we're gonna get dog walked tonight. That this team is a paper tiger. So I really want this win to put that doubt to rest.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
GettinitDone
General Manager
Posts: 7,569
And1: 4,677
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#246 » by GettinitDone » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:29 pm

Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.

We want the ball movement to be like a well oiled machine: smooth, fluid, organic, and spontaneous, which the Wolves game (when Josh didn't play, and Precious started at 4) showed us when Mikal (29pts, 6 assists, 12-18 FG) got a lot more touches than just standing around, he was scoring and assisting. Everyone seemed to play like a PG (as a team we had 39 assists, Deuce with 8 assists and Cam with 6 off the bench) instead of just a few "lead playmakers" like Josh hogging the ball looking to "pad up his assist stat" (I know Josh is one of the most unselfish players in the L, I'm just exaggerating to prove a point), and we played HIGHLY EFFICIENT offense (KAT with 32 pts and 20 rbds on 10-12 FG, as a team we shot 51.5 FG% and 44.4 3P%), we looked legit UNSTOPPABLE from START to FINISH against a decent Wolves team on the road.

A lot of times I feel like with Josh being one of the lead playmakers the ball movement is anything but... it even feels forced. Just because a player can pass doesn't mean he should get the team's big chunk of the passing role. Quite a lot of times, he passes to guys like OG or Mikal not exactly at the right place and OG and Mikal have to bail Josh out by forcing a difficult shot out of isos against several defenders. Players with more natural/ better passing skills and instincts (e.g. Mikal, JB or even Kolek) would see such situations 3-4 plays in advance and avoid them.

Against top tier teams like the Thunder, Celtics, Cavs, IMO this WORKING BUT NOT EXACTLY ELITE ball movement will get exposed imo. This game today will be telling if our offense fails and we commit a lot of TOs, I'll be watching like a hawk at Josh being one of our lead playmakers, I hope I'm wrong but imo it won't end well for our team.

This is why I advocate Josh moving to the bench. He will STILL PLAY STARTER MINUTES ANYWAY, but as a team we set the tone at start of games with ELITE ball movement without Josh: SMOOTH, FLUID, ORGANIC, SPONTANEOUS which should be our baseline standard if we're serious about contending for the title.

---

Precious starting at 4 also gives us more size, paint protection to help out KAT (who has been a beast at rebounding but from my observation there's no doubt he does NOT love being the last line on defense and rebounding and would absolutely appreciate help from another competent big). Offensively, although his game surely can improve, Precious is now competent enough to dribble, drive, shoot mid range to 3 pt and finish around the rim, be a fastbreak threat. Our team can benefit more from HARD DUNKERS to energize the team and the crowd (at MSG or even on the road where we got lots of fans) and help build even more camaraderie among teammates, and I feel like only KAT is doing that (OG ocassionally too) and now Precious comes to the scene to DUNK HARD.

Maybe this will sound trivial af but if we get a player by trade deadline, let it be someone who has a flair of dunking hard and hyping up the crowd, imo it fills an underrated need that our team is lacking.
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,393
And1: 7,966
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#247 » by sol537 » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:32 pm

I too am for Hart going to the bench in a Manu Ginobli role with Precious starting next to KAT... I think that unlocks this team's next level. However, since we won 9 in a row with the current starting line-up, I don't see them mixing it up just yet. Perhaps when Mitch returns we could see that switch so that Mitch can back up Precious/KAT and Hart gets the bulk of the back-up duties for the rest of the guys and then Duece/Cap get the remaining minutes depending on match-ups.

Precious / Mitch @ 20 mins
KAT
OG / Hart @ 32 mins
Bridges
Brunson / Deuce @ 20 mins

8-man rotation... 8 guys Thibs trusts. A terrific balance of rebounding, defense, shooting, playmaking, and bench depth.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,632
And1: 5,758
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#248 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:37 pm

GettinitDone wrote:Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.

We want the ball movement to be like a well oiled machine: smooth, fluid, organic, and spontaneous, which the Wolves game (when Josh didn't play, and Precious started at 4) showed us when Mikal (29pts, 6 assists, 12-18 FG) got a lot more touches than just standing around, he was scoring and assisting. Everyone seemed to play like a PG (as a team we had 39 assists, Deuce with 8 assists and Cam with 6 off the bench) instead of just a few "lead playmakers" like Josh hogging the ball looking to "pad up his assist stat" (I know Josh is one of the most unselfish players in the L, I'm just exaggerating to prove a point), and we played HIGHLY EFFICIENT offense (KAT with 32 pts and 20 rbds on 10-12 FG, as a team we shot 51.5 FG% and 44.4 3P%), we looked legit UNSTOPPABLE from START to FINISH against a decent Wolves team on the road.

A lot of times I feel like with Josh being one of the lead playmakers the ball movement is anything but... it even feels forced. Just because a player can pass doesn't mean he should get the team's big chunk of the passing role. Quite a lot of times, he passes to guys like OG or Mikal not exactly at the right place and OG and Mikal have to bail Josh out by forcing a difficult shot out of isos against several defenders. Players with more natural/ better passing skills and instincts (e.g. Mikal, JB or even Kolek) would see such situations 3-4 plays in advance and avoid them.

Against top tier teams like the Thunder, Celtics, Cavs, IMO this WORKING BUT NOT EXACTLY ELITE ball movement will get exposed imo. This game today will be telling if our offense fails and we commit a lot of TOs, I'll be watching like a hawk at Josh being one of our lead playmakers, I hope I'm wrong but imo it won't end well for our team.

This is why I advocate Josh moving to the bench. He will STILL PLAY STARTER MINUTES ANYWAY, but as a team we set the tone at start of games with ELITE ball movement without Josh: SMOOTH, FLUID, ORGANIC, SPONTANEOUS which should be our baseline standard if we're serious about contending for the title.

---

Precious starting at 4 also gives us more size, paint protection to help out KAT (who has been a beast at rebounding but from my observation there's no doubt he does NOT love being the last line on defense and rebounding and would absolutely appreciate help from another competent big). Offensively, although his game surely can improve, Precious is now competent enough to dribble, drive, shoot mid range to 3 pt and finish around the rim, be a fastbreak threat. Our team can benefit more from HARD DUNKERS to energize the team and the crowd (at MSG or even on the road where we got lots of fans) and help build even more camaraderie among teammates, and I feel like only KAT is doing that (OG ocassionally too) and now Precious comes to the scene to DUNK HARD.

Maybe this will sound trivial af but if we get a player by trade deadline, let it be someone who has a flair of dunking hard and hyping up the crowd, imo it fills an underrated need that our team is lacking.


Robinson, Payne, Kolek, Dadiet for Kessler, Sexton and two miniature contracts.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,841
And1: 43,432
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#249 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:39 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,481
And1: 27,167
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#250 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:42 pm

Guano wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Guano wrote:
I'm a liar.

I wanted it really bad but since we lost I'm discrediting it.

In truth I think it is gimmicky but also find it kinda fun. I do think it would be better if they made it in collaboration somehow with a euro champion squad just for fun.


It definitely added some excitement to those games but, I think it's because we just wanna win something!!! ANYTHING!! :lol:


Like this game tonight.

I know i shouldn't put too much stock in just one game. But I'm a long time Knicks fan and I can't help be pessimistic. I have this doubt that we just beat up on cupcakes and that we're gonna get dog walked tonight. That this team is a paper tiger. So I really want this win to put that doubt to rest.


Yeah. I'm excited but, I'm not climbing out on a limb. I'm a couple steps from the ledge. Worst case scenario just don't get mollywhopped.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
GettinitDone
General Manager
Posts: 7,569
And1: 4,677
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#251 » by GettinitDone » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:47 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
GettinitDone wrote:Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.

We want the ball movement to be like a well oiled machine: smooth, fluid, organic, and spontaneous, which the Wolves game (when Josh didn't play, and Precious started at 4) showed us when Mikal (29pts, 6 assists, 12-18 FG) got a lot more touches than just standing around, he was scoring and assisting. Everyone seemed to play like a PG (as a team we had 39 assists, Deuce with 8 assists and Cam with 6 off the bench) instead of just a few "lead playmakers" like Josh hogging the ball looking to "pad up his assist stat" (I know Josh is one of the most unselfish players in the L, I'm just exaggerating to prove a point), and we played HIGHLY EFFICIENT offense (KAT with 32 pts and 20 rbds on 10-12 FG, as a team we shot 51.5 FG% and 44.4 3P%), we looked legit UNSTOPPABLE from START to FINISH against a decent Wolves team on the road.

A lot of times I feel like with Josh being one of the lead playmakers the ball movement is anything but... it even feels forced. Just because a player can pass doesn't mean he should get the team's big chunk of the passing role. Quite a lot of times, he passes to guys like OG or Mikal not exactly at the right place and OG and Mikal have to bail Josh out by forcing a difficult shot out of isos against several defenders. Players with more natural/ better passing skills and instincts (e.g. Mikal, JB or even Kolek) would see such situations 3-4 plays in advance and avoid them.

Against top tier teams like the Thunder, Celtics, Cavs, IMO this WORKING BUT NOT EXACTLY ELITE ball movement will get exposed imo. This game today will be telling if our offense fails and we commit a lot of TOs, I'll be watching like a hawk at Josh being one of our lead playmakers, I hope I'm wrong but imo it won't end well for our team.

This is why I advocate Josh moving to the bench. He will STILL PLAY STARTER MINUTES ANYWAY, but as a team we set the tone at start of games with ELITE ball movement without Josh: SMOOTH, FLUID, ORGANIC, SPONTANEOUS which should be our baseline standard if we're serious about contending for the title.

---

Precious starting at 4 also gives us more size, paint protection to help out KAT (who has been a beast at rebounding but from my observation there's no doubt he does NOT love being the last line on defense and rebounding and would absolutely appreciate help from another competent big). Offensively, although his game surely can improve, Precious is now competent enough to dribble, drive, shoot mid range to 3 pt and finish around the rim, be a fastbreak threat. Our team can benefit more from HARD DUNKERS to energize the team and the crowd (at MSG or even on the road where we got lots of fans) and help build even more camaraderie among teammates, and I feel like only KAT is doing that (OG ocassionally too) and now Precious comes to the scene to DUNK HARD.

Maybe this will sound trivial af but if we get a player by trade deadline, let it be someone who has a flair of dunking hard and hyping up the crowd, imo it fills an underrated need that our team is lacking.


Robinson, Payne, Kolek, Dadiet for Kessler, Sexton and two miniature contracts.


Add John Collins, he dunks HARD!, and I'll think about it :)
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,125
And1: 6,264
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#252 » by whocares1 » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:52 pm

GettinitDone wrote:Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.
.


The reason why Josh gets so much playmaking responsibility is bc teams put their centers on him. So Knicks run a lot of pick and rolls with Josh as the screener. He also is elite at finishing at the rim so any rebound opportunities he gets is usually to push the break which is important to our offense since we have one of the slowest paces in the league. Josh’s playmaking ability is just a byproduct of taking what defense is giving us, and it’s working so why change it.
User avatar
GettinitDone
General Manager
Posts: 7,569
And1: 4,677
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#253 » by GettinitDone » Fri Jan 3, 2025 9:56 pm

whocares1 wrote:
GettinitDone wrote:Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.
.


The reason why Josh gets so much playmaking responsibility is bc teams put their centers on him. So Knicks run a lot of pick and rolls with Josh as the screener. He also is elite at finishing at the rim so any rebound opportunities he gets is usually to push the break which is important to our offense since we have one of the slowest paces in the league. Josh’s playmaking ability is just a byproduct of taking what defense is giving us, and it’s working so why change it.


It's working against the L's BOTTOM DWELLERS. Against top tier teams? We're about to learn the hard way.

Just because it's working doesn't mean it's ELITE.

To contend for a title, we can't be just GOOD, we need to be elite. The Wolves game showed us our ball movement was ELITE, moved around fluidly without a player holding the ball for 2-3 secs looking around for someone to pass to (I find Josh doing this quite a lot).
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,632
And1: 5,758
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#254 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:02 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
GettinitDone wrote:Not to burst bubbles, but imo Josh's getting lionshare of playmaking is the root cause of our working yet still clunky ball movement. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Josh's fan, he's incredible at defense, hustle plays and clutch rebounding. And he's very good at passing, it's just Thibs gives him TOO MUCH of a playmaking role which causes a particular player who's actually BETTER at playmaking standing around: MIKAL.

We want the ball movement to be like a well oiled machine: smooth, fluid, organic, and spontaneous, which the Wolves game (when Josh didn't play, and Precious started at 4) showed us when Mikal (29pts, 6 assists, 12-18 FG) got a lot more touches than just standing around, he was scoring and assisting. Everyone seemed to play like a PG (as a team we had 39 assists, Deuce with 8 assists and Cam with 6 off the bench) instead of just a few "lead playmakers" like Josh hogging the ball looking to "pad up his assist stat" (I know Josh is one of the most unselfish players in the L, I'm just exaggerating to prove a point), and we played HIGHLY EFFICIENT offense (KAT with 32 pts and 20 rbds on 10-12 FG, as a team we shot 51.5 FG% and 44.4 3P%), we looked legit UNSTOPPABLE from START to FINISH against a decent Wolves team on the road.

A lot of times I feel like with Josh being one of the lead playmakers the ball movement is anything but... it even feels forced. Just because a player can pass doesn't mean he should get the team's big chunk of the passing role. Quite a lot of times, he passes to guys like OG or Mikal not exactly at the right place and OG and Mikal have to bail Josh out by forcing a difficult shot out of isos against several defenders. Players with more natural/ better passing skills and instincts (e.g. Mikal, JB or even Kolek) would see such situations 3-4 plays in advance and avoid them.

Against top tier teams like the Thunder, Celtics, Cavs, IMO this WORKING BUT NOT EXACTLY ELITE ball movement will get exposed imo. This game today will be telling if our offense fails and we commit a lot of TOs, I'll be watching like a hawk at Josh being one of our lead playmakers, I hope I'm wrong but imo it won't end well for our team.

This is why I advocate Josh moving to the bench. He will STILL PLAY STARTER MINUTES ANYWAY, but as a team we set the tone at start of games with ELITE ball movement without Josh: SMOOTH, FLUID, ORGANIC, SPONTANEOUS which should be our baseline standard if we're serious about contending for the title.

---

Precious starting at 4 also gives us more size, paint protection to help out KAT (who has been a beast at rebounding but from my observation there's no doubt he does NOT love being the last line on defense and rebounding and would absolutely appreciate help from another competent big). Offensively, although his game surely can improve, Precious is now competent enough to dribble, drive, shoot mid range to 3 pt and finish around the rim, be a fastbreak threat. Our team can benefit more from HARD DUNKERS to energize the team and the crowd (at MSG or even on the road where we got lots of fans) and help build even more camaraderie among teammates, and I feel like only KAT is doing that (OG ocassionally too) and now Precious comes to the scene to DUNK HARD.

Maybe this will sound trivial af but if we get a player by trade deadline, let it be someone who has a flair of dunking hard and hyping up the crowd, imo it fills an underrated need that our team is lacking.


Robinson, Payne, Kolek, Dadiet for Kessler, Sexton and two miniature contracts.

He’s too expensive and I remember him being dunked on hard :lol: Sexton is tough as nails and an exciting player too. The trade should work financially as Utah does have these small, meaningless contracts to serve as fillers. We could add picks but I don’t think we’d need to.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#255 » by KnixinSix » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:22 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:Are Brunson and Deuce still “questionable” for the game?


Anyone know?
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,258
And1: 96,219
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#256 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:34 pm

5 hours until the inevitable yet delectable heartbreak.

Can't wait for the infighting and maybe even some bans!
Image
User avatar
Context
RealGM
Posts: 32,708
And1: 22,045
Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Location: where the Gods dwell! shhhhhhh
 

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#257 » by Context » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:36 pm

Read on Twitter


Spoiler:
LETS **** GO!!!!!
Image
Luka | Scotty |Dunn
Bane | Pritchard | Branham
Watson | Jmac | *
AD | Jaylin | Clarke
Chet | Edey | Neemias
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#258 » by K_ick_God » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:37 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g


Dumb.
User avatar
Context
RealGM
Posts: 32,708
And1: 22,045
Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Location: where the Gods dwell! shhhhhhh
 

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#259 » by Context » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:38 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:5 hours until the inevitable yet delectable heartbreak.

Can't wait for the infighting and maybe even some bans!


Spoiler:
NO! NO! and:


Spoiler:
NO! Buzz!


Spoiler:
:lol:


Spoiler:
We win this and some will argue, why- "the win"
wasn't convincing enough :lol:
Image
Luka | Scotty |Dunn
Bane | Pritchard | Branham
Watson | Jmac | *
AD | Jaylin | Clarke
Chet | Edey | Neemias
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,332
And1: 22,835
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Game 35: Knicks vs @OKC: 1/3/2025; 8:00pm NBA-TV 

Post#260 » by RHODEY » Fri Jan 3, 2025 10:38 pm

Guano wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Guano wrote:
I'm a liar.

I wanted it really bad but since we lost I'm discrediting it.

In truth I think it is gimmicky but also find it kinda fun. I do think it would be better if they made it in collaboration somehow with a euro champion squad just for fun.


It definitely added some excitement to those games but, I think it's because we just wanna win something!!! ANYTHING!! :lol:


Like this game tonight.

I know i shouldn't put too much stock in just one game. But I'm a long time Knicks fan and I can't help be pessimistic. I have this doubt that we just beat up on cupcakes and that we're gonna get dog walked tonight. That this team is a paper tiger. So I really want this win to put that doubt to rest.


Thunder IMO are like a top 2 team in the league right now, really almost nobody beats those teams on their own home court...even other top 2 visiting teams cant expect a win. But if we do win...my oh my.

Return to New York Knicks