Jerry Lucas wrote:Brinbe wrote:Jerry Lucas wrote:Both.
Nope lol, Ace Bailey is a minefield full of red flags everywhere so far. No other freshman prospect is comparable to him at the moment, in terms of number of significant red flags.
Good thing he's not gonna be 18 forever then. And he's not gonna be that in the league.
And acting like the other guys don't also have question marks is my point and also bad whataboutism.
If you're gonna nitpick, do it to everyone
You didn't actually read what I posted if you think I'm implying that the other guys you mentioned "don't also have question marks." Actually read what I posted again.
And if you're going to put that much stock into draft day age, we're just going to have to agree to disagree on that part. Also Kasparas in particular is only 3 months older than Ace, but yeah Edgecombe and Queen are definitely older freshmen compared to Kasparas and Ace.
I did and I think my point is that if you really dig into them like people are doing with Ace you'll end up in the same position as they all have flaws. Maybe Ace has more 'red flags' in terms of raw stats/analytics, but he also simply has size and skills that they don't too and you can't just ignore that.
For example, the thing with Jak is that he's obviously not the strongest athlete and I think it's fair to question if he's gonna be to successfully replicate all of this at the next level when he's facing stronger/faster/bigger athletes, and that's hard to totally ignore. And the difference between him and guys like Luka/Jokic who maybe also lack some top-tier athleticism is that they're absolute physical units in comparison. Is he ultimately gonna be a shooting guard at the next level with a bit of added passing ability? In that case, well we have a ton of shooting guards as is and I haven't really seen anything that really differentiates him too much from what we already have.
Edgecombe as much as I like him has his fair share of issues too. Is he gonna be a higher-end Ochai in the end?
Queen might be one of the most polarizing guys in the draft.
Obviously we'll have our faves, and I'm not exactly all aboard the 'we have to draft bailey' bandwagon, but I just think it's a bit weird that there's this intense focus on one prospect when everyone should be getting that scrutiny.
And I think that type of discourse would be more constructive when it's pretty much a free for all beyond Flagg/Harper who we can all agree either would be a big help to our team if drafted. But beyond that it's a giant question mark as far as I can tell so far.



























