Cavs get: Cam Johnson
Nets get: Caris LeVert, Jaylon Tyson, '30 unprotected swap, '31 unprotected first and 4 2nds
Why?
Cavs go all in, finally get a big wing.
Nets get a decent return. A good prospect, an expiring, and two high variable firsts.
Cavs and Nets
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cavs and Nets
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,226
- And1: 3,952
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Re: Cavs and Nets
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cavs and Nets
This is a pretty significant overpay for Johnson.
Re: Cavs and Nets
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,459
- And1: 2,077
- Joined: Oct 27, 2001
- Location: Newfoundland
Re: Cavs and Nets
I think for that much stuff, the Cavs would want Strus in the deal and not Levert, who they probably like better for this year and he expires, and things are getting pretty pricey over there.
If it's Strus in the deal and they let Levert go after this playoffs, the Cavs can just sneak under the 2nd apron next year, probably even with a little bump to keep one of Merrill or ideally Ty Jerome as 9th man (Okoro, Niang, Wade as frontcourt depth, they'd need to get lucky with a minimum guy at guard, but would have some minutes and ring potential to offer someone).
Maybe Strus can hit some shots and rebuild some value and be sent to a 3rd team for a 2026 expiring next deadline.
If it's Strus in the deal and they let Levert go after this playoffs, the Cavs can just sneak under the 2nd apron next year, probably even with a little bump to keep one of Merrill or ideally Ty Jerome as 9th man (Okoro, Niang, Wade as frontcourt depth, they'd need to get lucky with a minimum guy at guard, but would have some minutes and ring potential to offer someone).
Maybe Strus can hit some shots and rebuild some value and be sent to a 3rd team for a 2026 expiring next deadline.
Where's the D?
Re: Cavs and Nets
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,419
- And1: 2,818
- Joined: Feb 11, 2007
-
Re: Cavs and Nets
I think the Nets will prioritize a deal where the principle value can be realized in the next couple years rather than 7 years out.
Re: Cavs and Nets
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,914
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cavs and Nets
Way too much for Cam. Remove Tyson or one of the 1sts, along with a couple of seconds, and it's a lot more realistic.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cavs and Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,413
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Cavs and Nets
Cam Johnson is a great fit for Cleveland, but this trade is too much. I don’t think adding Cam makes Cleveland the favorite over Boston, and that’s the key factor in evaluating any deal involving unprotected picks and swaps extending into the 2030s. The Cavs already have a good team, with their oldest starter being Donovan Mitchell at 28. Instead of going all-in now, Cleveland should focus on paying off the Utah draft debt and keeping their assets intact for a potential larger move down the road, one that could extend the window for their current core.
Return to Trades and Transactions