2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
-
Memories
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 6,102
- Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
- Lakers In 5
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,476
- And1: 3,276
- Joined: Nov 15, 2018
- Location: SoCal
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
canada_dry wrote:Another showing in why its been sga> tatum.
Also a reminder that hes the mvp. Not the best player. Its not a best player award. But the mvp nonetheless.
And doing it without chet.
His #2 optiom continues to struggle in big games and big moments...doesn't matter.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
I don’t think that needed any showing to any person on the planet.
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
-
Mavrelous
- Forum Mod - Mavericks

- Posts: 20,089
- And1: 18,073
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
sikma42 wrote:Jokic would legit win 75 games with team and waltz to the title.
It’s not even close. Jokic is just on a different level.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Last year Denver had KCP and Murray had the best season of his career, and finshed behind the Thunder.
SGA is good, really good, if anything, his supporting cast is overated offensively, he's having am insane carry job.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
-
canada_dry
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,081
- And1: 7,112
- Joined: Aug 22, 2017
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
Champ1on
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,171
- And1: 611
- Joined: Apr 20, 2012
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
MaliBrah wrote:Infinite Llamas wrote:MMyhre wrote:He wasn`t just an All Star, he was high All-NBA in the playoffs. The guy is crazy talented, he is also crazy **** stupid and lazy apparently, to start fading athletically in your mid 20`s is just pathetic work ethic, especially when you have the chance to play with a top 10 talent of all time +/- and boost your own legacy sooooooooo far beyond what it would be without Jokic. But hey, go **** some street hoes and use that money and be known as the bum that held Jokic back instead. What a fool.
Murray could have cemented his legacy as the Scottie Pippen to Jokic’ Jordan just by staying in shape for starters and rack up some championships. But it’s true that Murray is too lazy and stupid to figure out just how revered he could have been with just a little extra effort. It’s mind boggling to me how someone could sabotage their own legacy so badly.
you guys think it's easy to tear your ACL and have your calfs zapped by injuries , he's lost his burst
That injury happened before the championship. He tears his ACL then goes on to win a championship playing like a top 10 guard and now he's bottom tear in starters but being paid max money and people are bringing up his past injury as an excuse is weird. It would make more sure if that ACL injury happened after the championship run.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
Rdude22
- Sophomore
- Posts: 140
- And1: 157
- Joined: Dec 17, 2023
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
canada_dry wrote:Another showing in why its been sga> tatum.
Also a reminder that hes the mvp. Not the best player. Its not a best player award. But the mvp nonetheless.
And doing it without chet.
His #2 optiom continues to struggle in big games and big moments...doesn't matter.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
That chase down block on Tatum leading to the Hartestein alley oop lob... that was the nail in the coffin.
And yea, i mentioned it pages ago, numerous players have won mvp despite not conventionally being viewed as the best player. And honestly in SGA's case... he'd be no worse than #3 right now behind Jokic and Giannis, and tbh there's some solid arguments you could make for him over Giannis. So an mvp winner having a strong argument for the 2nd if not for sure 3rd best player in the league is pretty par the course with past winners.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
Snake3
- Junior
- Posts: 353
- And1: 310
- Joined: May 12, 2011
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
MaliBrah wrote:Snake3 wrote:MaliBrah wrote:you guys think it's easy to tear your ACL and have your calfs zapped by injuries , he's lost his burst
Yeah, it's a shame man. I thought he was going to take leap and become all-star or an all-nba guard. But he injuries piled up. He may not have the best work ethic and he just can't get consistent play. Right now I believe he said earlier in the season that he was dealing with knee issues.
But when he plays like an all-nba guard, the Nuggets goes to another tier as a team.
The injuries have fried his lower body and his burst man. He used to dunk on guys easy lol. Then in the offseason how do you stay in top shape AND heal those injuries? it's easy for us to criticize from the couch .
This is true. I only hear reports of stuff. Like we didn't know he was dealing with knee issues until he said so.
But there are reports saying that he doesn't come to training camp in shape either. Not just this year, but I think last year too. We don't know how bad it is. Regardless, he hasn't lived up to his potential to me. He's an all-star caliber player that doesn't play like one in the RS. And he is injury prone.
There are still some bad stuff he does on the court that's IQ related. But when it comes to athleticism, it's just a shame that he had all of those injuries that slowed him down. Not too sure of his work ethic outside from the reports.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
- MaliBrah
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,108
- And1: 4,613
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
Champ1on wrote:MaliBrah wrote:Infinite Llamas wrote:
Murray could have cemented his legacy as the Scottie Pippen to Jokic’ Jordan just by staying in shape for starters and rack up some championships. But it’s true that Murray is too lazy and stupid to figure out just how revered he could have been with just a little extra effort. It’s mind boggling to me how someone could sabotage their own legacy so badly.
you guys think it's easy to tear your ACL and have your calfs zapped by injuries , he's lost his burst
That injury happened before the championship. He tears his ACL then goes on to win a championship playing like a top 10 guard and now he's bottom tear in starters but being paid max money and people are bringing up his past injury as an excuse is weird. It would make more sure if that ACL injury happened after the championship run.
Ahh because that's how the human body works right ? His surgically repaired knee is good the year after surgery but can't lead to complications and issues moving forward? D Wade for example didn't look good in short term and his legs just got zapped as time went on?
lmao
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
BigGargamel
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,299
- And1: 11,077
- Joined: Jan 28, 2020
- Contact:
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
Jokic is absolutely the better player, but even I am starting to come to the acceptance that the team record difference may be too great to overcome.
Perhaps if the Denver front office was as serious as OKC's at building a lasting contender, this wouldn't even be a discussion.
Perhaps if the Denver front office was as serious as OKC's at building a lasting contender, this wouldn't even be a discussion.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
One_and_Done
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,689
- And1: 5,737
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
Yeh, it feels like the momentum is (rightly) shifting to SGA.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
CobraCommander
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,404
- And1: 16,518
- Joined: May 01, 2014
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
One_and_Done wrote:Yeh, it feels like the momentum is (rightly) shifting to SGA.
At some point- It feels like it but Jokic just avg 43 and 13.5 and 9.5 over the weekend against Wemby.
But damn 15 in a row? And people were saying SGA wasn’t as as the other top 7 guys because Chet and he team was too good- but at some point SGA and Tatum ARE the reason why their teams are so good and thus they are better guys with slightly better numbers -
I’m not team SGA yet but I’m squarely in team SGA is at worse the 3rd best player on earth - mvp or not- everyone healthy or not… sga is proving to the be the best LEADER in the NBA -
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
canada_dry
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,081
- And1: 7,112
- Joined: Aug 22, 2017
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
I agree. But apparently its been a debate to some people...Demagoog wrote:canada_dry wrote:Another showing in why its been sga> tatum.
Also a reminder that hes the mvp. Not the best player. Its not a best player award. But the mvp nonetheless.
And doing it without chet.
His #2 optiom continues to struggle in big games and big moments...doesn't matter.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
I don’t think that needed any showing to any person on the planet.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
Snake3
- Junior
- Posts: 353
- And1: 310
- Joined: May 12, 2011
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
BigGargamel wrote:Jokic is absolutely the better player, but even I am starting to come to the acceptance that the team record difference may be too great to overcome.
Perhaps if the Denver front office was as serious as OKC's at building a lasting contender, this wouldn't even be a discussion.
That's what they wanted to do. Instead of getting other guys, Booth wanted to develop from their drafted picks. He wanted to compete for years like the Spurs in the 00s and early 10s.
Although, they could just being cheap too. They also had bad contracts that nobody wants.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
One_and_Done
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,689
- And1: 5,737
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
CobraCommander wrote:One_and_Done wrote:Yeh, it feels like the momentum is (rightly) shifting to SGA.
At some point- It feels like it but Jokic just avg 43 and 13.5 and 9.5 over the weekend against Wemby.
But damn 15 in a row? And people were saying SGA wasn’t as as the other top 7 guys because Chet and he team was too good- but at some point SGA and Tatum ARE the reason why their teams are so good and thus they are better guys with slightly better numbers -
I’m not team SGA yet but I’m squarely in team SGA is at worse the 3rd best player on earth - mvp or not- everyone healthy or not… sga is proving to the be the best LEADER in the NBA -
Don't put Tatum in the same sentence as SGA like that.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
- Lakers In 5
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,476
- And1: 3,276
- Joined: Nov 15, 2018
- Location: SoCal
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
canada_dry wrote:I agree. But apparently its been a debate to some people...Demagoog wrote:canada_dry wrote:Another showing in why its been sga> tatum.
Also a reminder that hes the mvp. Not the best player. Its not a best player award. But the mvp nonetheless.
And doing it without chet.
His #2 optiom continues to struggle in big games and big moments...doesn't matter.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
I don’t think that needed any showing to any person on the planet.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
There may be some Celtic homers, but even they would have to agree that Tatum is just not that good. He is very good, but not MVP level good. He can hang with anyone for 48 minutes, but do it 82 games in a row and he cannot compete with the likes of Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
- OkcSinceSGA
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,187
- And1: 32,892
- Joined: Sep 19, 2015
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
“This kid reminds me of a 6-6 Chris Paul. He wants to win everything.”
Olin Simplis- SGA’s trainer.
Olin Simplis- SGA’s trainer.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 32,864
- And1: 25,185
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
They have to fix the cup thing. It’s weird that OKC lost a game in there but nothing about it actually counted.
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
-
sikma42
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,901
- And1: 6,116
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
Mavrelous wrote:sikma42 wrote:Jokic would legit win 75 games with team and waltz to the title.
It’s not even close. Jokic is just on a different level.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Last year Denver had KCP and Murray had the best season of his career, and finshed behind the Thunder.
SGA is good, really good, if anything, his supporting cast is overated offensively, he's having am insane carry job.
What does even mean? OKCs supporting cast is magnitudes above Denver p. It isn’t even a comparison. Denver is playing guys that are barely NBA players that Jokic makes look serviceable.
SGA is playing with a team with an all time great supporting cast. Honestly don’t even think it makes sense to go down the supporting cast bc it’s not even close. SGA is on a historically great defensive team, with great shooter, role players and another budding star. That’s about as good as it gets. He should be expected to at least make the Finals this year.
At some point you have to factor in team strength. I don’t think SGA has separated himself from Luka and is worse than Jokic. Prob worse than Giannis too. Right now Jokic is playing better than some of the greatest players to ever touch a ball. I don’t think SGA is there..he’s just on an insanely stacked team that makes hides all his weaknesses.
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
-
Patches Perry
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,405
- And1: 18,725
- Joined: May 11, 2016
-
Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:They have to fix the cup thing. It’s weird that OKC lost a game in there but nothing about it actually counted.
It's why me and my boys think touting the 15 game streak is a bit cringe. We know they lost in the middle of there and the game not counting is a technicality.
Although they're up to 10 games now in terms of their real winning streak.
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
- MaliBrah
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,108
- And1: 4,613
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011
-
Re: MVP is SGA misspelled
sikma42 wrote:Mavrelous wrote:sikma42 wrote:Jokic would legit win 75 games with team and waltz to the title.
It’s not even close. Jokic is just on a different level.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Last year Denver had KCP and Murray had the best season of his career, and finshed behind the Thunder.
SGA is good, really good, if anything, his supporting cast is overated offensively, he's having am insane carry job.
What does even mean? OKCs supporting cast is magnitudes above Denver p. It isn’t even a comparison. Denver is playing guys that are barely NBA players that Jokic makes look serviceable.
SGA is playing with a team with an all time great supporting cast. Honestly don’t even think it makes sense to go down the supporting cast bc it’s not even close. SGA is on a historically great defensive team, with great shooter, role players and another budding star. That’s about as good as it gets. He should be expected to at least make the Finals this year.
At some point you have to factor in team strength. I don’t think SGA has separated himself from Luka and is worse than Jokic. Prob worse than Giannis too. Right now Jokic is playing better than some of the greatest players to ever touch a ball. I don’t think SGA is there..he’s just on an insanely stacked team that makes hides all his weaknesses.
This is such nonsense bait lol. Hartenstein was out 1 months , Chet out 2 months , third string C was out for 3 months... 2 weeks with no C on the roster. Caruso has been in and out the team. It hasn't mattered at all. He has a lot of defensive help but he's single handedly lifting that offence. Jokic is the best player in the world but the difference in his and Shai's play is not great enough to overcome a 15-20 win difference. Jokic getting the MVP with 48 wins over Shai again beating him out to wins but this time beating him by that many would be absurd.
I won't even talk about Giannis and Luka comments. Giannis may be better as well but he's not ahead of Shai in this race. As for Luka , Shai has been worlds better this season (just reffering to this season)



