Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,380
- And1: 98,228
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
I don't hate the Lakers paying something to save the salary/tax. Money always matters. But it should be a team who doesn't have the same opportunity cost as Detroit. Detroit should aim for a larger dump first.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,549
- And1: 1,994
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
shagadelic45 wrote:LAL TRADES: JHS, 2025 #2 (LAC), Cash
DET:
Detroit waives JHS with the included cash and picks up a second for virtually nothing....
Lakers save considerable second apron tax money......
Pistons would only take him if they actually believed that he was someone worth developing or this is like the very last trade at the deadline.
To me, I would offer him to Washington for space of someone like Patrick Baldwin Jr. They make take less just to see if he’s worth anything.
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,955
- And1: 15,114
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: Lakers and Pistons (small cash deal)
Billl wrote:Obviously this isn't something detroit considers unless they completely strike out at the deadline. The pistons are looking to improve, not just be a salary cap dumping ground.
But if it comes to that type of thing, I think my fellow pistons fans are overestimating how valuable cap space is. $3 mil of cap space for a second would translate into 3 second rounders for a $14mil salary dump for contracts that expire in a couple months. That's really the top end of what a salary dump trade deadline would look like.... which is why I'm hoping we don't do that.
Depends how leveraged we are. If teams like the Suns, Lakers, or Warriors need us to facilitate a deal it should be a FRP. But I'll be amazed if we use it wisely.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Return to Trades and Transactions